Outsourcing through intermunicipal co-operation: Waste collection and treatment services in Brazil

References

• Abrúcio, F. L., & Sano, H. (2013). Associativismo intergovernamental: experiências brasileiras [Interfederal associativism: The Brazilian experience]. Editora IABS.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. (2014). Local governments in multilevel systems: Emergent public administration challenges. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(4_suppl), 47S–62S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., & Fageda, X. (2011). Big guys eat big cakes: Firm size and contracting in urban and rural areas. International Public Management Journal, 14(1), 4–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., Fageda, X., & Mur, M. (2012). Does co-operation reduce service delivery costs? Evidence from residential solid waste services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 85–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., & Gradus, R. (2018). Privatisation, contracting-out and inter-municipal co-operation: new developments in local public service delivery. Local Government Studies, 44(1), 11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., Hebdon, R., & Warner, M. E. (2018). Beyond privatisation and cost savings: alternatives for local government reform. Local Government Studies, 44(2), 173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., & Warner, M. E. (2008). Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(12), 1337–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., & Warner, M. E. (2015). Inter-municipal co-operation and costs: expectations and evidence. Public Administration, 93(1), 52–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendell, T., Boulter, L., & Kelly, J. (1994). Implementing quality in the public sector. Pitman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Blaeschke, F., & Haug, P. (2017). Does intermunicipal co-operation increase efficiency? A conditional metafrontier approach for the Hessian wastewater sector. Local Government Studies, 44(1), 151–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N., & Priest, J. (2019). Designing social research. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, A.E, & Vining, A.R. (2012). The political economy of public-private partnerships and analysis of their social value. Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics, 83(2), 117-141.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2005). Transaction costs and contracting: The practitioner perspective. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 326–351.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods, 5^th edition. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campos-Alba, C. M., Higuera-Molina, E. J., Pérez-López, G., & Zafra-Gómez, J. L. (2017). Explanatory factors in the renewal of contracts for the privatisation of public services. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 3(1), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Da Cruz, N. F., & Marques, R. C. (2012). Mixed companies and local governance: no man can serve two masters. Public Administration, 90(3), 737–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., Grant, B., & Kortt, M. (2012). Councils in co-operation: shared services in Australian local government. Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, 14(3), 9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E.H. (2009). Project versus process management in public–private partnership: Relation between management style and outcomes. International Public Management Journal, 12(3), 310-331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & Teisman, G. R. (2011). Numéro spécial sur la gouvernance de l'eau. Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives, 77(1), 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Fattore, G., Dubois, H. F., & Lapenta, A. (2012). Measuring new public management and governance in political debate. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 218–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2007). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(1), 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2013). The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 397–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimreite, A. L., & Lægreid, P. (2009). Reorganizing the welfare state administration. Public Management Review, 11(3), 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, P. L., & Millar, A. J. (2017). Valuing the project: a knowledge-action response to network governance in collaborative research. Public Money & Management, 37(1), 23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frère, Q., Leprince, M., & Paty, S. (2014). The impact of intermunicipal co-operation on local public spending. Urban Studies, 51(8), 1741–1760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geys, B., & Sørensen, R.J. (2016). Revenue scarcity and government outsourcing: Empirical evidence from Norwegian local governments. Public Administration, 94(3), 769-788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, E. J., & Abrúcio, F. L. (2018). Las capacidades estatales de los municipios brasileños en un contexto de descentralización de políticas [Brazilian local governments capacities in a context of policy decentralization]. Reforma y Democracia, 70, 93–126.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, E. J., do Nascimento, A. B., Abrúcio, F. L., & Fernandes, A. S. (2018). Sobre desconexões e hiatos: uma análise de capacidades estatais e finanças públicas em municípios brasileiros [About disconnections and gaps: an analysis of state capacities and public finances in Brazilian municipalities]. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 23(76), 302–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. E. (2011). Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market, and management characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 289–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, L., Coutinho, M. L., & Mingoti, S. A. (2006). Diferentes modelos de gestão de serviços de saneamento produzem os mesmos resultados? Um estudo comparativo em Minas Gerais com base em indicadores. [Do different sanitation service management models produce the same results? A comparative study in Minas Gerais based on indicators]. Engenharia sanitária e ambiental, 11(4), 325–336.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A. (2000). Privatization: An international review of performance. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G.A., & Greve, C. (2007). Public–private partnerships: an international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 545-558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homsy, G. C., Liu, Z., & Warner, M. E. (2018). Multilevel governance: framing the integration of top-down and bottom-up policy-making. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 572–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A new public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2-3), 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulst, J. R., & Van Montfort, A. (2012). Institutional features of inter-municipal co-operation: Co-operative arrangements and their national contexts. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 121–144.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe: An assessment of ten years of research on the theme. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). The impact of contract characteristics on the performance of public–private partnerships (PPPs). Public Money & Management, 36(6), 455–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., van Meerkerk, I., & Edelenbos, J. (2019). How do network characteristics influence network managers’ choice of strategies? Public Money & Management, 1-11.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E., Koppenjan, J., & Termeer, K. (1995). Managing networks in the public sector: a theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public Administration, 73(3), 437–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klok, P. J., Denters, B., Boogers, M., & Sanders, M. (2018). Intermunicipal Co-operation in the Netherlands: The costs and the effectiveness of polycentric regional governance. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 527–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffin, M. (2016). Planning in England: new public management, network governance or post-democracy? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 354–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroux, K., Brandenburger, P. W., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). Interlocal service co-operation in US cities: A social network explanation. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 268–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, T. (2002). Delivering joined–up government in the UK: dimensions, issues and problems. Public Administration, 80(4), 615–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, J. A., & Andrade, M. (2014). Cooperação intergovernamental, consórcios públicos e sistemas de distribuição de custos e benefícios [Intergovernmental co-operation, public consortia and the cost-benefit distribution systems]. Revista de Administração Pública, 48(3), 695–720.
   Google Scholar
• Maiello, A., Britto, A. N., & Valle, T. F. (2018). Implementação da Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos [Implementation of the national solid waste policy]. Revista de Administração Pública, 52(1), 24–51.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, R. C., & De Witte, K. (2011). Is big better? On scale and scope economies in the Portuguese water sector. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 1009–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, A.2019). A research agenda for public administration. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meneguzzo, M., Sancino, A., Guenon, M., & Fiorani, G. (2013). New development: The crisis and European local government reforms. Public Money & Management, 33(6), 459–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, C. (2005). A new institutional approach to organization. In C. Ménard, & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (pp. 281–318). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, R. S. (2011). The practice of collaborative governance. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 953–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J., & Maddocks, J. (2016). New development: Mutual solutions to shaping public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 36(1), 55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro-Espigares, J. L., & Martín-Segura, J. A. (2011). Public–private partnership and regional productivity in the UK. Service Industries Journal, 31(4), 559–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niaounakis, T., & Blank, J. (2017). Inter-municipal co-operation, economies of scale and cost efficiency: an application of stochastic frontier analysis to Dutch municipal tax departments. Local Government Studies, 43(4), 533–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'TooleJrL. J., & Meier, K. (2004). Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4), 469–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (ed.). (2010). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (eds.). (2012). New public governance, the third sector, and co-production. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-López, G., Prior, D., & Zafra-Gómez, J. L. (2015). Rethinking new public management delivery forms and efficiency: Long-term effects in Spanish local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1157–1183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience. Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2003). Joined-up government: a survey. Political Studies Review, 1(1), 34–49.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-Into the Age of Austerity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: governing without government. Political studies, 44(4), 652–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (1997). Performance-based organizations: Assessing the Gore plan. Public Administration Review, 57(6), 465–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoute, M., Budding, T., & Gradus, R. (2018). municipalities’ choices of service delivery modes: the influence of service, political, governance, and financial characteristics. International Public Management Journal, 21(4), 502–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M. K., & Feiock, R. C. (2011). Transaction cost, exchange embeddedness, and interlocal co-operation in local public goods supply. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 573–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre, H. C., Marques, R. C., Dollery, B., & Correia, A. M. (2019). Shared services in brazilian local government: urban development in small counties. Public Administration, 97(3), 686–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre, H. C., Marques, R. C., Dollery, B., & Correia, A. M. (2020). Is co-operation cost reducing? An analysis of public-public partnerships and inter-municipal co-operation in Brazilian local government. Local Government Studies, 46(1), 68–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre, H. C., Marques, R. C., & Gomes, R. C. (2018). Joined-up government of utilities: a meta-review on a public–public partnership and inter-municipal co-operation in the water and wastewater industries. Public Management Review, 20(4), 607–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spink, P. (2005). The inter-municipal consortia in Brazil: an institutional introduction. In X Congresso Internacional CLAD, 1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, A.F. (2017) Ten years after: revisiting the determinants of the adoption of municipal corporations for local service delivery Local Government Studies, 43(5), 697-706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., & Camões, P. S. (2007). Local service delivery choices in Portugal: a political transaction costs framework. Local Government Studies, 33(4), 535–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., & Camões, P. S. (2010). New forms of local governance service. Public Management Review, 12(4), 587–608.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., & Feiock, R. C. (2017). Applying an institutional collective action framework to investigate intermunicipal co-operation in Europe. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(4), 299–316.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G.R., & Klijn, E. (2002) Partnership arrangements: governmental rhetoric or governance scheme? Public Administration review, 62(2), 197-205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhorst, P. (2008). Reclaiming public water; changing sector policy through globalization from below. Progress in Development Studies, 8(1), 103–114.
   Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, D. M. (2003). The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 296–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorn, B., van Genugten, M., & van Thiel, S. (2019). Multiple principals, multiple problems: Implications for effective governance and a research agenda for joint service delivery. Public Administration, 97(3), 671–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Hefetz, A. (2003). Rural—urban differences in privatization: Limits to the competitive state. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(5), 703–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafra-Gómez, J. L., Prior, D., Díaz, A. M. P., & López-Hernández, A. M. (2013). Reducing costs in times of crises: Delivery forms in small and medium sized local government waste management services. Public Administration, 91(1), 51–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar