3,870
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

A consistent bottom-up approach for deriving a conceptual framework for public sector financial accounting

References

  • Arnaboldi, M., & Lapsley, I. (2009). On the implementation of accrual accounting: A study of conflict and ambiguity. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 809–836.
  • Baker, R., & Rennie, M. (2006). Forces leading to the adoption of accrual accounting by the Canadian federal government: An institutional perspective. Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 5(1), 83–112.
  • Barton, A. (2005). Professional accounting standards and the public sector—A mismatch accounting system. ABACUS, 41(2), 138–158.
  • Barton, A. (2011). Why governments should use the government finance statistics accounting system. ABACUS, 47(4), 411–445.
  • Bergmann, A., Fuchs, S., & Schuler, C. (2019). A theoretical basis for public sector accrual accounting research: Current state and perspectives. Public Money & Management, 39(8), 560–570.
  • Biondi, Y. (2011). The pure logic of accounting: A critique of the fair value revolution. Accounting, Economics, and Law. A Convivium, 1(1), DOI: http://doi.org/10.2202/2152-2820.1018
  • Biondi, Y. (2012a). What do shareholders do? accounting, ownership and the theory of the firm: Implications for corporate governance and reporting. Accounting, Economics, and Law. A Convivium, 2(2), DOI: http://doi:10.1515/2152-2820.1068
  • Biondi, Y. (2012b). Should business and non-business accounting be different? A comparative perspective applied to the new French governmental accounting standards. International Journal of Public Administration (IJPA), 35(9), 603–619.
  • Biondi, Y. (2013). Governmental accounting and austerity policies: Accounting representations of public debt and deficit in Europe and abroad. Accounting Forum (2016), DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.05.003
  • Biondi, Y. (2014). Harmonising European public sector accounting standards (EPSAS): Issues and perspectives for Europe’s economy and society. Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 4(3), 165–178.
  • Biondi, Y. (2017). Harmonising European public sector accounting standards (EPSAS): Issues and perspectives. Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 7(2), 117–123.
  • Caruana, J., Dabbicco, G., Jorge, S., & Jesus, M. A. (2019). The development of EPSAS: Contributions from the literature. Accounting in Europe, DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2019.1624924
  • Chan, J. L. (2003). Government accounting: An assessment of theory, purposes and standards. Public Money & Management, 23(1), 13–20.
  • Chan, J. L. (2006). IPSAS and government accounting reform in developing countries. In E. Lande, & J. C. Scheid (Eds.), Accounting reform in the public sector: Mimicry, fad or necessity? CIGAR Network.
  • Christiaens, J., Christiaens, V., Christophe, M.-R. F., Aversano, N., & van Cauwenberge, P. (2015). The effect of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial reporting: An international comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(1), 158–177.
  • Christiaens, J., Reyniers, B., & Rolle, C. (2010). Impact of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial information systems: A comparative study. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76, 537–554.
  • Christiaens, J., & van Peteghem, V. (2007). Governmental accounting reform: Evolution of the implementation in flemish municipalities. Financial Accountability & Management, 23(4), 375–99.
  • Cordery, C. J., Crawford, L., Breen, O. B., & Morgan, G. G. (2018). International practices, beliefs and values in not-for-profit financial reporting. Accounting Forum, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2018.05.001
  • Deloitte. (2015). Comments to the exposure draft 2015/3. In CF for financial reporting. IASB.
  • Ellwood, S. M., & Newberry, S. M. (2016). New development. The conceptual underpinnings of international public sector accounting. Public Money & Management, 36(3), 231–234.
  • Ernst & Young. (2012). Overview and comparison of public accounting and auditing practices in the EU member status. Eurostat.
  • FGAB. (2009). Comments on the Consultation Paper Phase 1, IPSASB framework project.
  • GASB. (1987). Objectives of financial reporting. Concepts statement No. 1 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. NO. 037, MAY 1987.
  • GASB. (2006). Why governmental accounting and financial reporting is—and should be—different (white paper).
  • GASB. (2007). Concepts statement No. 4 of the governmental accounting standards board on concepts related to elements of financial statements. Government Accounting Standards Board.
  • GASB. (2014a). Fair value measurement and application. Proposed statement of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (Exposure Draft).
  • GASB. (2014b). Concepts statement No. 6 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board on concepts related to measurement of elements of financial statements.
  • GASB. (2015). Statement No. 72 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board fair value measurement and application.
  • Hendriksen, E. S. (1982). Accounting theory (4th edn). R. D. Irwin.
  • Hepworth, N. (2017). Is implementing the IPSAS an appropriate reform? Public Money & Management, 37(2), 141–148. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1266174
  • Hitz, J.-M. (2007). The decision usefulness of fair value accounting—A theoretical perspective. European Accounting Review, 16(2), 323–362.
  • IASB. (2015). Exposure draft CF for financial reporting. ED/2015/3. https://www.iasplus.com/en/news/2015/05/cf-ed.
  • IPSASB. (2014). The CF for general purpose financial reporting by public sector entities.
  • IPSASB. (2019). Consultation paper: Measurement.
  • Jones, R., & Caruana, J. (2014). A perspective on the proposal for European public sector accounting standards, in the context of accruals in UK government accounting. Accounting, Economics and Law, 4(3), 265–282.
  • Laughlin, R. (2008). A CF for accounting for public-benefit entities. Public Money & Management, 28(4), 247–254.
  • Laughlin, R. (2012). Debate: Accrual accounting: Information for accountability or decision usefulness? Public Money & Management, 32(1), 45–46.
  • Lewis, R., & Pendrill, D. (1994). Advanced financial accounting (4th edn). Pitman Publishing.
  • Lorson, P., & Haustein, E. (2019). Debate: On the role of prudence in public sector accounting. Public Money & Management, Public Money & Management, 39(6), 389–390. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1583907
  • Mann, B., Lorson, P., Oulasvirta, L., & Haustein, E. (2019). The quest for a primary EPSAS purpose—insights from literature and CFs. Accounting in Europe, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2019.1632467
  • McCullers, L. D., & Schroeder, R. G. (1982). Accounting theory—text and readings (2nd edn). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Monsen, N. (2002). The case for cameral accounting. Financial Accountability & Management, 18, 39–72.
  • Monsen, N. (2019). Commercial accounting, fund accounting and cameral accounting: Introduction and comparison with a view to use in the governmental sector. Norwegian School of Economics (NHH).
  • Moretti, D. (2018). Rationalising government fiscal reporting. lessons learned from Australia, Canada, France and the United Kingdom on how to better address users’ needs. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2, 65–125.
  • Mussari, R. (2014). EPSAS and the unification of public sector accounting across Europe. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 4(3), 299–312.
  • Müller-Marqués Berger, T. (2012). IPSAS explained. A summary of international public sector accounting standards (2nd edn). Wiley/EY.
  • Naciri, A., & Hoarau, C. (2001). A comparative analysis of American and French financial reporting philosophies: The case for international accounting standards. Advances in International Accounting, 14, 229–247.
  • Oulasvirta, L. (2014a). The reluctance of a developed country to choose international public sector accounting standards of the IFAC. A critical case study. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25, 272–285.
  • Oulasvirta, L. (2014b). Governmental financial accounting and European harmonisation: Case study of Finland. Accounting, Economics and Law, A Convivium, 4(3), 237–263.
  • Oulasvirta, L. (2015). Public sector accounting and auditing in Finland. In I. Brusca, E. Caperchione, S. Cohen, & F. M. Rossi (Eds.), Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe. The challenge of harmonization (pp. 60–74). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Oulasvirta, L. (2019). Budgets and budgetary accounting. In P. Lorson, S. Jorge, & E. Haustein (Eds.), European public sector accounting. Coimbra University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1861-6.
  • Oulasvirta, L., & Bailey, S. J. (2016). Evolution of EU public sector financial accounting standardisation: Critical events that opened the window for attempted policy change. Journal of European Integration, 38(6), 653–669.
  • Pallot, J. (1992). Elements of a theoretical framework for public sector accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 5(1), 38–59.
  • Pirinen, P. (2005). Economic and normative pressures as drivers for the adoption of international accounting standards in Finland since 1976. European Accounting Review, 14, 213–235.
  • Power, M. (2010). Fair value accounting, financial economics and the transformation of reliability. Accounting and Business Research, 40, 197–210.
  • Rutherford, B. A. (2000). An introduction to modern financial reporting theory. Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • Van Helden, J. (2016). Literature review and challenging research agenda on politicians’ use of accounting information. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 531–538.
  • Van Helden, J., & Reichard, C. (2018). Cash or accruals for budgeting? Why some governments in Europe changed their budgeting mode and others not. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1, 89–113.
  • Van Helden, J., & Reichard, C. (2019). Making sense of the users of public sector accounting information and their needs. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(4), 478–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2018-0124
  • Vehmanen, P. (2008). The CF of IPSASB from a theoretical point of view. In Discussion paper. University of Tampere.
  • Warren, K. (2015). Time to look again at accrual budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3, 113–129.
  • Whittington, G. (2008). Harmonisation or discord? The critical role of the IASB CF review. Journal of Accounting Public Policy, 27, 495–502.
  • Young, J. J. (2006). Making up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 579–600.