The lifecycle of public value creation: eroding public values in the Dutch Marker Wadden project

References

• Alford, J., Douglas, S., Geuijen, K., & ‘t Hart, P. (2017). Ventures in public value management: Introduction to the symposium. Public Management Review, 19(5), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barciela Rial, M. (2019). Consolidation and drying of slurries: A Building with nature study for the Marker Wadden [Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology]. Delft University of Technology Repository. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:ae11c3e7-86f2-4c6a-8d53-ee8781d56a72.
   Google Scholar
• Beck Jørgensen, T., & Vrangbæk, K. (2011). Value dynamics: Towards a framework for analysing public value changes. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(8), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.583776
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2016). Ideas as coalition magnets: Coalition building, policy entrepreneurs, and power relations. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boffey, D. (2019, April 27). Marker Wadden, the manmade Dutch archipelago where wild birds reign supreme. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/27/marker-wadden-islands-netherlands-manmade-archipelago-wild-birds-eco-haven.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., & Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830. doi:10.1017/S1049096511001429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., ‘t Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2017). Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vriend, H. J., van Koningsveld, M., Aarninkhof, S. G., de Vries, M. B., & Baptist, M. J. (2015). Sustainable hydraulic engineering through building with nature. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 9(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, G., & Richardson, J. (1999). Competing advocacy coalitions and the process of ‘frame reflection’: A longitudinal analysis of EU steel policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duijn, M., Van Buuren, A., Klijn, E. H., & Minkman, E. (2018). Marker Wadden –bestuurskundige beelden over een complex waterbouwkundig project [Marker Wadden –governance views on a complex water engineering project]. GovernEUR.
   Google Scholar
• Duijn, M., van Buuren, A., Sparrevik, M., Slob, A., Ellen, G. J., & Oen, A. (2016). Getting caught up in the game: Managing non-formal dynamics in the remediation of contaminated sediments in Oslo harbor. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(5), 927–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1047490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grotenbreg, S. (2019). The U-turn in government facilitation: How Dutch water authorities facilitate nongovernmental initiatives. Public Works Management & Policy, 24(4), 344–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X19827026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotenbreg, S., & van Buuren, A. (2018). Realizing innovative public waterworks: Aligning administrative capacities in collaborative innovation processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, S45–S55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.128
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IJff, S., Ellen, G. J., Veraart, J. A., & van Riel, M. C. (2018). Leren van Marker Wadden: Over het speelveld en governance opgaven [Learning from Marker Wadden: On the playing field and governance challenges]. Deltares.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., Veeneman, W., Van der Voort, H., Ten Heuvelhof, E., & Leijten, M. (2011). Competing management approaches in large engineering projects: The dutch randstadRail project. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2016). Introduction: Process thinking, process theorizing and process researching. In A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of process organization studies (pp. 1–25). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Metze, T., & Dodge, J. (2016). Dynamic discourse coalitions on hydro-fracking in europe and the united states. Environmental Communication, 10(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1133437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 192–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732632
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). Water governance in the Netherlands: Fit for the future? Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Rijke, J., van Herk, S., Zevenbergen, C., Ashley, R., Hertogh, M., & ten Heuvelhof, E. (2014). Adaptive programme management through a balanced performance/strategy oriented focus. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1197–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, L., & Richardson, T. (2001). Reflections on foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jepp. 88
   Google Scholar
• Shimer, D. (2018, December 26). Fake islands bring a Dutch lake back to life. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/26/world/europe/netherlands-fake-islands.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Riet, O. A. W. T. (2003). Policy analysis in a multi-actor policy settings: Navigating between negotiated nonsense & superfluous knowledge. [Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology]. Delft University of Technology Repository. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:c406a7ca-e15a-4b62-b5c7-bc64a05fcac6.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., & Van Hout, E. T. J. (2009). Is public value pluralism paramount? The intrinsic multiplicity and hybridity of public values. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902732681
   Google Scholar
• Van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2016). From policy ‘frames’ to ‘framing’ theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014533142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sense-making in organizations. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, J. J., Busscher, T., Woltjer, J., & Arts, J. (2018). Co-creating value through renewing waterway networks: A transaction-cost perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 69, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel, G., & Leipold, S. (2016). Demolishing dikes: Multiple streams and policy discourse analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 108–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar