Drivers of reform implementation in local government: a qualitative comparative analysis

References

• Allers, M. A., & Geertsema, J. B. (2016). The effects of local government amalgamation on public spending, taxation, and service levels: Evidence from 15 years of municipal consolidation. Journal of Regional Science, 56(4), 659–682. doi:10.1111/jors.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of management, 40(5), 1297–1333. doi:10.1177/0149206314527128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Beynon, M. J., & McDermott, A. M. (2015). Organizational capability in the public sector: a configurational approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2), 239–258. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Boyne, G. A. (2009). Size, structure and administrative overheads: an empirical analysis of English local authorities. Urban Studies, 46(4), 739–759. doi:10.1177/0042098009102127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, D., & Dibben, P. (2002). Public sector innovation and entrepreneurship: case studies from local government. Local government studies, 28(4), 107–121. doi:10.1080/714004159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basurto, X., & Speer, J. (2012). Structuring the calibration of qualitative data as sets for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Field Methods, 24(2), 155–174. doi:10.1177/1525822X11433998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg-Schlosser, D., De Meur, G., Ragin, C., & Rihoux, B. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach. In B. Rihoux & C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (Vol. 51, pp. 1-18): SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2018). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In C. M. Weible, & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 263–308). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bikker, J., & Van der Linde, D. (2016). Scale economies in local public administration. Local government studies, 42(3), 441–463. doi:10.1080/03003930.2016.1146139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1972). Interdependence and hierarchy in organizations. Social Science Research, 1(1), 1–24. doi:10.1016/0049-089X(72)90055-5
   Google Scholar
• Borins, S. (2000). Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 498–507. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & Kuhlmann, S. (2016). Introduction: Comparing local public sector reforms: Institutional policies in context. In S. Kuhlmann, & G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis (pp. 1–20). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: a critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 367–394. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, M., De Visscher, C., & Vancoppenolle, D. (2006). Administrative reform in Belgium: maintenance or modernisation? West European Politics, 29(5), 979–998. doi:10.1080/01402380600968869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L., Hebert, F. T., & Wright, D. S. (1999). Reinventing government in the American states: measuring and explaining administrative reform. Public Administration Review, 59(1), 19–30. doi:10.2307/977476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplow, T. (1957). Organizational size. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(4), 484–505. doi:10.2307/2390870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chackerian, R., & Mavima, P. (2001). Comprehensive administrative reform implementation: moving beyond single issue implementation research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 353–378. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(2), 264–290. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1967). The city in the future of democracy. The American Political Science Review, 61(4), 953–970. doi:10.2307/1953398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. doi:10.1111/padm.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, M. A. (2020). The effects of organizational and demographic context for innovation implementation in public organizations. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1852–1875. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1668467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denters, B., Goldsmith, M., Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P. E., & Rose, L. E. (2014). Size and local democracy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dusa, A. (2018). QCA with R: a comprehensive resource: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Farneti, F. (2009). Balanced scorecard implementation in an Italian local government organization. Public Money & Management, 29(5), 313–320. doi:10.1080/09540960903205964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooqi, S., & Forbes, T. (2020). Enacted discretion: policy implementation, local government reform and education services in Pakistan. Public Management Review, 22(8), 1217–1239. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1630134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., Hartley, J., & Martin, S. (2003). Changing public service organizations: current perspectives and future prospects. British Journal of Management, 14(s1), S1–S14. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00389.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, R. C., Alfinito, S., & Albuquerque, P. H. M. (2013). Analyzing local government financial performance: evidence from Brazilian municipalities 2005-2008. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 17(6), 704–719. doi:10.1590/S1415-65552013000600005
   Google Scholar
• Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: a diffusion study. American political science review, 67(4), 1174–1185. doi:10.2307/1956539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, C., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2016). Introduction: the Nordic model in transition. In C. Greve, P. Lægreid, & L. H. Rykkja (Eds.), Nordic administrative reforms: lessons for public management (pp. 1–21). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. B. (2011). Antecedents of organizational innovation: the diffusion of new public management into Danish local government. Public Administration, 89(2), 285–306. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01855.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinelt, H., Hlepas, N., Kuhlmann, S., & Swianiewicz, P. (2018). Local government systems: grasping the institutional environment of mayors. In H. Heinelt, A. Magnier, M. Cabria, & H. Reynaert (Eds.), Political leaders and changing local democracy (pp. 19–78). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hennau, S. (2016). (PhD Thesis). Gemeentelijke politiek-ambtelijke verhoudingen v2.0? De invloed van het Gemeentedecreet op de politiek-ambtelijke verhoudingen in de Vlaamse gemeenten.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansson, H. (2019). Challenges to decentralization of disaster management in Turkey: The role of political-administrative context. International journal of public administration, 42(5), 417–431. doi:10.1080/01900692.2018.1466898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homans, L. (2016). Conceptnota aan de Vlaamse regering. Betreft: integratie van de openbare centra voor maatschappelijk welzijn en de gemeentebesturen: organieke uitwerking. Naar een sterk geïntegreerd lokaal sociaal beleid.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: variations on a theme. Accounting, organizations and society, 20(2-3), 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuffer, N. (2018). Does local autonomy facilitate local government reform initiatives? Evidence from Switzerland. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(4), 426–447. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-01-2017-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A., & Pasha, O. (2019). Managing change and mitigating reform cynicism. Public Money & Management, 1–9. doi:10.1080/09540962.2019.1683982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2016). Administrative reform: Processes, trends, and content. In Nordic Administrative Reforms (pp. 105–128). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lago-Penas, S. M.-V., J. (2013). The challenge of local government size: theoretical perspectives, international experience and policy reform.: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lavertu, S., Lewis, D. E., & Moynihan, D. P. (2013). Government reform, political ideology, and administrative burden: the case of performance management in the Bush administration. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 845–857. doi:10.1111/puar.12132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindvall, J. (2017). Reform capacity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. A. (2006). Incentives, capacity, and implementation: evidence from Massachusetts education reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 45–65. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 9(2), 171–178. doi:10.3102/01623737009002171
   Google Scholar
• Meneguzzo, M., Sancino, A., Guenon, M., & Fiorani, G. (2013). New development: The crisis and European local government reforms. Public Money & Management, 33(6), 459–462. doi:10.1080/09540962.2013.836010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1989). The structuring of organizations. In Readings in strategic management (pp. 322–352). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, P. E., & Svara, J. H. (2002). Leadership at the apex: politicians and administrators in Western local governments. University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelissen, N. (2002). The administrative capacity of new types of governance. Public Organization Review, 2, 5–22. doi:10.1023/A:1016019302732
   Google Scholar
• Oana, I.-E., & Schneider, C. Q. (2018). SetMethods: an Add-on R Package for Advanced QCA. The R Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E., & Valotti, G. (2008). Public management reform in Italy: explaining the implementation gap. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 174–204. doi:10.1108/09513550810855654
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. (2011). Stealth economy? Economic theory and the politics of administrative reform. Administration & Society, 43(6), 672–692. doi:10.1177/0095399711412928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2017). Implementing public policy. In Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 115–134). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative methods. University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2009). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapanos, V. T., & Kaplanoglou, G. (2014). Governance, growth and the recent economic crisis: The case of Greece and Cyprus. Cyprus Economic Policy Review, 8(1), 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2004). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): State of the art and prospects. APSA 2004 Annual Meeting, Panel 47-9.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, M. M. (1968). Economic determinants of organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(4), 614–625. doi:10.2307/2391536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushing, W. A. (1967). The effects of industry size and division of labor on administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(2), 273–295. doi:10.2307/2391552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santis, S., Grossi, G., & Bisogno, M. (2019). Drivers for the voluntary adoption of consolidated financial statements in local governments. Public Money & Management, 39(8), 534–543. doi:10.1080/09540962.2019.1618072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, C., Bouckaert, G., & Kuhlmann, S. (2017). Autonomy, performance, participation: lessons from the comparative study of local public sector reforms. In C. Schwab, G. bouckaert, & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), The future of local government in Europe. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. (2015). The “public service bargain” in local government: A new way of looking at relations between municipal councils and CAOs. Canadian Public Administration, 58(3), 406–425. doi:10.1111/capa.12120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, T., Teles, F., & Torsteinsen, H. (2017). Improving local service delivery: increasing performance through reforms. In C. Schwab, G. Bouckaert, & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), The Future of Local Government in Europe (pp. 53–78). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., Hammerschmid, G., Andrews, R., & Bezes, P. (2016). Introduction: public administration reforms in Europed. In G. Hammerschmid, S. Van de Walle, R. Andrews, & P. Bezes (Eds.), Public Administration Reforms in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kolk, B. (2019). Management control packages: a literature review and guidelines for public sector research. Public Money & Management, 39(7), 512–520. doi:10.1080/09540962.2019.1592922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Helden, G. J. (2000). Is financial stress an incentive for the adoption of businesslike planning and control in local government? A comparative study of eight Dutch municipalities. Financial Accountability & Management, 16(1), 83–100. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00098
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. (2014). Internal and external antecedents of process innovation: a review and extension. Public Management Review, 16(1), 21–44. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.771698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A., & Brewer, G. A. (2010). Public management and performance: Research directions. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windels, P., & Christiaens, J. (2006). Management reform in Flemish public centres for social welfare: examining organisational change. Local government studies, 32(4), 389–411. doi:10.1080/03003930600792864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar