594
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Government accounting literacy as an attribute of smart citizenship

References

  • Al Nuaimi, E., Al Neyadi, H., Mohamed, N., & Al-Jaroodi, J. (2015). Applications of big data to smart cities. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 6(1), 25.
  • Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21.
  • Aleksandrov, E., Bourmistrov, A., & Grossi, G. (2018). Participatory budgeting as a form of dialogic accounting in Russia. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(4), 1098–1123.
  • Alford, J. (1998). A public management road less travelled: Clients as co-producers of public services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57(4), 128–137.
  • Allen, R. D. (2013). US government spending, the national debt, and the role of accounting educators. Journal of Accounting Education, 31(3), 215–231.
  • Amagir, A., Groot, W., Maassen van den Brink, H., & Wilschut, A. (2018). A review of financial-literacy education programs for children and adolescents. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 17(1), 56–80.
  • Arroub, A., Zahi, B., Sabir, E., & Sadik, M. (2016, October). A literature review on smart cities: Paradigms, opportunities and open problems. In 2016 international conference on wireless networks and mobile communications (WINCOM) (pp. 180–186). IEEE.
  • Barber, B. R. (1989). Public talk and civic action: Education for participation in a strong democracy. Social Education, 53(6), 355–357.
  • Batagan, L. (2011). Indicators for economic and social development of future smart city. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 6(3), 27–34.
  • Bennington, J. (2009). Creating the public in order to create public value? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 232–249.
  • Bonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2015). Citizens’ engagement on local governments’ facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 52–62.
  • Bovaird, T., Stoker, G., Jones, T., Loeffler, E., & Pinilla Roncancio, M. (2016). Activating collective co-production of public services: Influencing citizens to participate in complex governance mechanisms in the UK. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 47–68.
  • Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G. G., Loeffler, E., & Parrado, S. (2015). Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. Journal of Social Policy, 44(1), 1–23.
  • Brown, J. (2009). Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(30), 313–342.
  • Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2006). Are citizens significant users of government financial information? Public Money & Management, 26(4), 205–209.
  • Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., & Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640–654.
  • Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82.
  • Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019). Being a ‘citizen’in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84(1), 1–13.
  • Carenys, J., Moya, S., & Perramon, J. (2017). Is it worth it to consider videogames in accounting education? A comparison of a simulation and a videogame in attributes, motivation and learning outcomes. Revista de Contabilidad, 20(2), 118–130.
  • Castelnovo, W. (2016). Co-production makes cities smarter: Citizens’ participation in smart city initiatives. In Co-production in the public sector (pp. 97–117). Springer.
  • Castelnovo, W. (2019). Coproduction and cocreation in smart city initiatives: An exploratory study. In E-participation in smart cities: |Technologies and models of governance for citizen engagement. Springer.
  • Castelnovo, W., Misuraca, G., & Savoldelli, A. (2015). Citizen’s engagement and value co-production in smart and sustainable cities. In International conference on Public Policy.
  • Cerna, M., Poulova, P., & Svobodova, L. (2018). The elderly in SMART cities. In International KES conference on smart education and smart E-learning (pp. 224–233). Springer.
  • Choguill, M. B. G. (1996). A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat International, 20(3), 431–444.
  • Cohen, S., & Karatzimas, S. (2020). Do smart cities report ‘smart’? Evidence from awarded smart cities. Working paper, EGPA annual conference.
  • Cohen, S., Mamakou, X. J., & Karatzimas, S. (2017). IT-enhanced popular reports: Analyzing citizen preferences. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 283–295.
  • Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Cantador, I., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2019). Analyzing citizen participation and engagement in european smart cities. Social Science Computer Review, https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319877478.
  • Cowley, R., Joss, S., & Dayot, Y. (2018). The smart city and its publics: Insights from across six UK cities. Urban Research & Practice, 11(1), 53–77.
  • Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Mordán, N., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2014). Is local financial health associated with citizens’ quality of life? Social Indicators Research, 119(2), 559–580.
  • Dameri, R. P., & Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (2014). Smart city and value creation. In Smart city: How to create public and economic value with high technology in urban space (pp. 1–12). Springer.
  • De Waal, M., & Dignum, M. (2017). The citizen in the smart city. How the smart city could transform citizenship. It-Information Technology, 59(6), 263–273.
  • Degbelo, A., Granell, C., Trilles, S., Bhattacharya, D., Casteleyn, S., & Kray, C. (2016). Opening up smart cities: Citizen-centric challenges and opportunities from GIScience. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(2), 16.
  • Egerton, M. (2002). Higher education and civic engagement. The British Journal of Sociology, 53(4), 603–620.
  • Engelbert, J., van Zoonen, L., & Hirzalla, F. (2019). Excluding citizens from the European smart city: The discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 347–353.
  • Facer, K., & Buchczyk, M. (2019). Towards a research agenda for the ‘actually existing’ learning city. Oxford Review of Education, 45(2), 151–167.
  • Galston, W. A. (2007). Civic knowledge, civic education, and civic engagement: A summary of recent research. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(6-7), 623–642.
  • Gilson, L., & Goldberg, C. (2015). Editor’s comment: So, what is a conceptual paper? Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 127–130.
  • Goldsmith, S., & Crawford, S. (2014). The responsive city: Engaging communities through data-smart governance. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Gómez, J. L., & Monroy, L. D. (2018). Gamification In accounting distance education. Economy & Business Journal, 12(1), 208–215.
  • Hemment, D., & Townsend, A. (2013). Smart citizens. FutureEverything. http://futureeverything.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/smartcitizens1.pdf.
  • Herrador-Alcaide, T. C., Hernández-Solís, M., & Hontoria, J. F. (2020). Online learning tools in the era of m-learning: Utility and attitudes in accounting college students. Sustainability, 12(12), 5171.
  • Hudson, L., Wolff, A., Gooch, D., Van Der Linden, J., Kortuem, G., Petre, M., … O'Connor-Gotra, S. (2019). Supporting urban change: Using a MOOC to facilitate attitudinal learning and participation in smart cities. Computers & Education, 129, 37–47.
  • Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments-a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 4.
  • Jordan, M., Yusuf, J. E. W., Mayer, M., & Mahar, K. (2016). What citizens want to know about their government’s finances: Closing the information gap. The Social Science Journal, 53(3), 301–308.
  • Karatzimas, S. (2020). The beneficial role of government accounting literacy in developing participatory citizens. Accounting Education, 29(3), 229–246.
  • Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 131–136.
  • Liu, D., Huang, R., & Wosinski, M. (2017). Development of smart cities: Educational perspective. In Smart learning in smart cities (pp. 3–14). Springer.
  • Lombardi, P. (2011). New challenges in the evaluation of smart cities. The Network Industries, 13(3), 8–10.
  • Manchester, H., & Cope, G. (2019). Learning to be a smart citizen. Oxford Review of Education, 45(2), 224–241.
  • Marriott, P., & McGuigan, N. (2018). Visual metaphor and visual tools in accounting education. Accounting Education, 27(6), 549–551.
  • Matos, F., Vairinhos, V. M., Dameri, R. P., & Durst, S. (2017). Increasing smart city competitiveness and sustainability through managing structural capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(3), 693–707.
  • Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408.
  • Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: what is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 192–219.
  • Molnar, A. (2020). Smart cities education: an insight into existing drawbacks. Telematics and Informatics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101509.
  • Moncada, S. M., & Moncada, T. P. (2014). Gamification of learning in accounting education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 14(3), 9.
  • Monfardini, P. (2010). Accountability in the new public sector: A comparative case study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(7), 632–646.
  • Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value. Harvard University Press.
  • Murphy, E. A. (2005). Enhancing student learning with governmental accounting jeopardy!. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 17(2), 223.
  • Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Smart city as urban innovation: focusing on management, policy, and context. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (pp. 185–194.
  • Neuroni, A. C., Haller, S., van Winden, W., Carabias-Hütter, V., & Yildirim, O. (2019). Increasing public value creation for smart cities using an ecosystem approach. In M. P. Rodriguez Bolivar (Ed.), Setting foundations for the creation of public value in smart cities. Springer.
  • Papi, L., Bigoni, M., Bracci, E., & Deidda Gagliardo, E. (2018). Measuring public value: a conceptual and applied contribution to the debate. Public Money & Management, 38(7), 503–510.
  • Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. Information Polity, 23(2), 143–162.
  • Ranchordás, S. (2020). Nudging citizens through technology in smart cities. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 34(3), 254–276.
  • Reddick, C. G., Chatfield, A. T., & Jaramillo, P. A. (2015). Public opinion on national security agency surveillance programs: A multi-method approach. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 129–141.
  • Rodriguez-Bolívar, M. P. (2019). The relevance of public value into smart cities. In Setting foundations for the creation of public value in smart cities (pp. 3–13). Springer.
  • Rose, J., Persson, J. S., & Heeager, L. T. (2015). How e-government managers prioritise rival value positions: The efficiency imperative. Information Polity, 20(1), 35–59.
  • Rothschild, J., & Russell, R. (1986). Alternatives to bureaucracy: Democratic participation in the economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 307–328.
  • Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Smart cities: Quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects of human capital. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 324–335.
  • Shelton, T., & Lodato, T. (2019). Actually existing smart citizens: Expertise and (non) participation in the making of the smart city. City, 23(1), 35–52.
  • Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.
  • Thomas, J. C. (1990). Public involvement in public management: Adapting and testing a borrowed theory. Public Administration Review, 50(4), 435–445.
  • Verba, S. (1967). Democratic participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 373(1), 53–78.
  • Visvizi, A., Lytras, M. D., & Daniela, L. (2018). Re) defining smart education: Towards dynamic education and information systems for innovation networks. In Enhancing knowledge discovery and innovation in the digital era (pp. 1–12). IGI Global.
  • Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17, 1333–1357.
  • Walravens, N., Breuer, J., & Ballon, P. (2014). Open data as a catalyst for the smart city as a local innovation platform. Communications & Strategies, 96, 15.
  • Waymire, T. R., Sohl, S. N., & Howard, B. (2015). Public administrators’ understanding of external financial reporting: It begins with curriculum. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 21(2), 281–294.
  • Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269.
  • Whicher, A., & Crick, T. (2019). Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland innovation Lab. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 290–299.
  • Winters, J. V. (2011). Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. Journal of Regional Science, 51(2), 253–270.
  • Wise, S., Paton, R. A., & Gegenhuber, T. (2012). Value co-creation through collective intelligence in the public sector: A review of US and European initiatives. Vine, 42(2), 251–276.
  • Zhao, F. (2019). Using quizizz to integrate fun multiplayer activity in the accounting classroom. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 37–43.
  • Zhuang, R., Fang, H., Zhang, Y., Lu, A., & Huang, R. (2017). Smart learning environments for a smart city: From the perspective of lifelong and lifewide learning. Smart Learning Environments, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-017-0044-8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.