Risk governance through public sector interactive control systems: The intricacies of turning immeasurable uncertainties into manageable risks

References

• Alvarez, S., Afuah, A., & Gibson, C. (2018). Editors’ comments: Should management theories take uncertainty seriously? Academy of Management Review, 43(2), 169–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barretta, A., & Busco, C. (2011). Technologies of government in public sector's networks: In search of cooperation through management control innovations. Management Accounting Research, 22(4), 211–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batac, J., & Carassus, D. (2009). Interactions between control and organizational learning in the case of a municipality: A comparative study with Kloot (1997). Management Accounting Research, 20, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L., & Osborne, S. P. (2013). Risk and innovation: Towards a framework for risk governance in public services. Public Management Review, 15(2), 186–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukh, P. N., & Svanholt, A. K. (2020). Empowering middle managers in social services using management control systems. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 10.1108/JPBAFM-06-2019-0096
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. (2004). Qualitative interviewing. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Children Act. (2004). London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Corduneanu, R., & Lebec, L. (2020). People in suits: A case study of empowerment and control in a non-profit UK organization. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32(3), 511–528.
   Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization studies, 22(2), 251–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (1991). Child abuse. A study of inquiry reports 1980-1989. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dudau, A., Favotto, A., Kominis, G., & Sicilia, M. (2020). Building trust in public sector networks: The role of rhetoric and persuasion. Financial Accountability & Management, 36(2), 134–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudau, A., Fischbacher-Smith, D., & McAllister, L. (2016). The unsung heroes of welfare collaboration: Complexities around individuals’ contribution to effective inter-agency working in LSCBs. Public Management Review, 18(10), 1536–1558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudau, A. I. (2010). Managing Uncertainty: Public administrators dealing with ‘wicked’ issues in public policy. Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Verwaltungswissenschaften, 1(1), 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human relations, 18(1), 21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewusi-Mensah, K. (1981). The external organizational environment and its impact on management information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6(4), 301–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Gephart, R. P. J. Jr., Van Maanen, J., & Oberlechner, T. (2009). Organizations and risk in late modernity. Organization Studies, 30(2-3), 141–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, D., & Lee Willinger, G. (2012). Management control systems, environmental uncertainty, and organizational slack: Empirical evidence. In Advances in management accounting (pp. 87–117.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, F. (2000). The appropriateness of RAPM: Toward the further development of theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4-5), 451–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, F. (2005). The effects of tolerance for ambiguity and uncertainty on the appropriateness of accounting performance measures. Abacus, 41(3), 241–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, S., & Griffiths, H. (2000). Reflections in child protection: Is it time for a shift in paradigms? Child and Family Social Work, 5(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative advantage. Public Management Review, 2(3), 337–357.
   Google Scholar
• Kloot, L. (1997). Organizational learning and management control systems: Responding to environmental change. Management Accounting Research, 8(1), 47–73.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1921/2012). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Courier Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kominis, G., & Dudau, A. I. (2012). Time for interactive control systems in the public sector? The case of the Every Child Matters policy change in England. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), 142–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, R., Geyskens, I., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2016). The effectiveness of contractual and trust-based governance in strategic alliances under behavioral and environmental uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 37(12), 2521–2542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord Laming. (2003). The Victoria Climbié inquiry. Report of an inquiry by Lord Laming. The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lord Laming. (2009). The protection of children in England: A progress report. The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, E. A. (1971). On the idea of a management control system. Journal of Management Studies, 2, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. (2009). Organizational risk after modernism. Organization Studies, 30(2-3), 141–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1671–1678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report, a child-centred system (Vol. 8062). The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2019). Decision-making under uncertainty in child protection: Creating a just and learning culture. Child & Family Social Work, 24(1), 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., Brandsen, T., Mele, V., Nemec, J., van Genugten, M., & Flemig, S. (2020). Risking innovation. Understanding risk and public service innovation—evidence from a four nation study. Public Money & Management, 40(1), 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otley, D. T., & Berry, A. J. (1994). Case study research in management accounting and control. Management Accounting Research, 5(1), 45–65.
   Google Scholar
• Rana, T., Hoque, Z., & Jacobs, K. (2019a). Public sector reform implications for performance measurement and risk management practice: Insights from Australia. Public Money & Management, 39(1), 37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana, T., Wickramasinghe, D., & Bracci, E. (2019b). New development: Integrating risk management in management control systems—lessons for public sector managers. Public Money & Management, 39(2), 148–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossing, C. P. (2013). Tax strategy control: The case of transfer pricing tax risk management. Management Accounting Research, 24(2), 175–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (1990). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1–2), 127–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (1991). Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (1994). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1992). ‘Perceptions of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm’. In S. Krimsky, & D. Golding (Eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Terreberry, S. (1968). The evolution of organizational environments. Administrative science quarterly, 590–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessier, S., & Otley, D. (2012). A conceptual development of Simons’ Levers of Control framework. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 171–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomela, T. S. (2005). The interplay of different levers of control: A case study of introducing a new performance measurement system. Management Accounting Research, 16(3), 293–320.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, K. (2019). Debate: Is managing for risk through resilience the answer in the quest for sustainability in the public sector? Public Money & Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1654320
   Google Scholar
• Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 757–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Designing case studies. Qualitative Research Methods, 5, 359–386.
   Google Scholar