1,306
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
New developments

Complexity-informed interpretation of social innovation

References

  • Boisot, M. H. (1999). Knowledge assets. Securing competitive advantage in the information economy. Oxford University Press.
  • Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2014). Complexity theory and the social sciences. Routledge.
  • Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism. Understanding complex systems. Routledge.
  • Geyer, R., & Rihani, S. (2010). Complexity and public policy. A new approach to 21st century politics, policy and society. Routledge.
  • Dixon-Woods, M., Amalberti, R., Goodman, S., Bergman, B., & Glasziou, P. (2011). Problems and promises of innovation: why healthcare needs to rethink its love/hate relationship with the new. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20, 47–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046227
  • Heimer, C. A. (2013). ‘Wicked’ ethics: Compliance work and the practice of ethics in HIV research. Social Science & Medicine, 98, 371–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.030
  • Holland, J. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Addison Wesley.
  • Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., Schröder, A., & Zirngiebl, M.2019). Atlas of social innovation. 2nd volume: A world of new practices. Oekom Verlag.
  • Krlev, G., Einarsson, T., Wijkström, F., & Mildenbergert, G. (2019). The policies of social innovation: A cross-national analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(3), 457–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019866505
  • Lundström, N., Raisio, H., Vartiainen, P., & Lindell, J. (2016). Wicked games changing the storyline of urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 154, 20–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.010
  • Meriluoto, T. (2018). Turning experience into expertise. Technologies of the self in Finnish participatory social policy. Critical Policy Studies, 12(3), 294–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1310051
  • Mitleton-Kelly, E.2003). Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organizations: the application of complexity theory to organizations. Pergamon.
  • Mulgan, G. (2020). The Imaginary Crisis (and how we might quicken social and public imagination). UCL, Demos.
  • Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Said Business School, Oxford.
  • Nicolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1989). Exploring Complexity. WH Freeman.
  • Raisio, H., Puustinen, A., & Vartiainen, P. (2018). The concept of wicked problems: improving the understanding of managing problem wickedness in health and social care. In W. Thomas, A. Hujala, S. Laulainen, & R. McMurray (Eds.), The management of wicked problems in health and social care. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102597.
  • Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
  • Sherraden, M. (2014). Asset building research and policy: Pathways, and potential of a social innovation. In R. Cramer & T. R. William Shanks (Eds.), The assets perspective. The rise of asset building and its impact on social policy (pp. 263–284). Springer.
  • Stacey, R. (2010). Complexity and organizational realities: uncertainty and the need to rethink management after the collapse of investment capitalism. Routledge.
  • Terstriep, J., Rehfeld, D., & KLeverebck, M. (2020). Favourable social innovation ecosystem(s)? An explorative approach. European Planning Studies, 28(5), 881–905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1708868