Co-creation as social innovation: including ‘hard-to-reach’ groups in public service delivery

References

• Afridi, A. (2007). Community cohesion and deprivation: A discussion paper for the commission on integration and cohesion. Commission on Integration and Cohesion.
   Google Scholar
• Afridi, A. (2016). Is This as Good as It Gets? Descriptive Representation and Equality in Public Policy-Making. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham]. University of Birmingham Research Archive. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81670159.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation came to: tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., Needham, C., & Waring, J. (2019). Inside co-production: Ruling, resistance, and practice. Social Policy & Administration, 53(2), 197–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, M., & Kellough, J. E. (2011). Representative bureaucracy: Assessing the evidence on active representation. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M., & Mattson, K. (1999). Deliberative democracy in practice: Challenges and prospects for civic deliberation. Polity, 31(4), 609–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, E., Pahl, K., Pente, E., & Rasool, Z. (2018). Re-imagining contested communities : Connecting rotherham through research. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), s14–s32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortis, N. (2012). Overlooked and under-served? Promoting service use and engagement among hard populations. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(4), 351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowden, S., & Singh, G. (2017). Community cohesion, communitarianism and neoliberalizm. Critical Social Policy, 37(2), 268–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd edn.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthill, M., & Fien, J. (2005). Capacity building: Facilitating citizen participation in local governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64(4), 63–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2010). Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 419–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C., & Richardson, L. (2016). Designing public policy for co-production: Theory, practice and change. Bristol University Press/Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M., Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (2013). Understanding localism. Policy Studies, 34(4), 401–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint, J., & Robinson, D. (2008). Community cohesion in crisis? : New dimensions of diversity and difference. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance’. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusch, P., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5590/JOSC.2018.10.1.02
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, W., & Brown, A. (2009). Working with qualitative data. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gunaratnam, Y. (2003). Researching ‘race’ and ethnicity: Methods, knowledge and power. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., & Schwartz, B. (2017). Familiar stranger: A life between two islands. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. (2006). Integrated deliberation: Reconciling civil society's dual role in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 54(3), 486–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, N. (2013). The advancement of racial neoliberalism in britain. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(6), 1028–1046. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.629002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattab, N., & Johnston, R. (2013). Ethnic and religious penalties in a changing British labour market from 2002 to 2010: The case of unemployment. Environment and Planning A, 45(6), 1358–1371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Gardner, A. (2016). Local governance under the conservatives: Super-austerity, devolution and the smarter. Local Government Studies, 42(3), 357–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Lemprière, M. (2018). Understanding variation in processes of institutional formation. Political Studies, 66(1), 226–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & McCaughie, K. (2013). Weathering the perfect storm? austerity and institutional resilience in local government. Policy & Politics, 41(4), 533–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2016). Coproduction as a structural transformation of the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(6), 596–611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2016-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model (s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Parks, R. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Percy, S. L. (1978). The public service production process: A framework for analysing police services. Policy Studies Journal, 7(s1), 381–389.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2012). Austerity urbanism. City, 16(6), 626–655.
   Google Scholar
• Phillimore, J., Bradby, H., Knecht, M., Padilla, B., & Pemberton, S. (2019). Bricolage as conceptual tool for understanding access to healthcare in superdiverse populations. Social Theory & Health, 17(2), 231–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6, 34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, D. (2012). Coproduction and network structures in public education. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (pp. 145–168). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2008). Representation and democracy: Revisions and possibilities. Sociology Compass, 2(3), 1000–1013.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2009). Authorisation and authenticity: Representation and the unelected. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumaker, P. D. (1975). Policy responsiveness to protest-group demands. The Journal of Politics, 37(2), 488–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., & Stephenson, S. (2005). The theory and practice of group representation: Reflections on the governance of race equality in Birmingham. Public Administration, 83(2), 323–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G., & John, P. (2009). Design experiments: Engaging policy-makers in the search for evidence about what works. Political Studies, 57(2), 356–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaeghe, P. P., Li, Y., & Van de Putte, B. (2013). Socio-economic and ethnic inequalities in social capital from the family among labour market entrants. European Sociological Review, 29(4), 683–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas, 23(4), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1997). Deferring group representation. Nomos, 39, 349–376.
   Google Scholar