The credibility of finance committees and information usage: trustworthy to whom?

References

• Aquino, A. C. B. d., & Batley, R. A. (2021). Pathways to hybridization: Assimilation and accommodation of public financial reforms in Brazil. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101297.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P. (2018). New development: Parliamentary ‘watchdogs’ taking a higher profile on government programme performance and accountability? Public Money & Management, 38(6), 471–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglio, Jr. R. P., Belardinelli, P., Bellé, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2019). Behavioral public administration ad fontes: A synthesis of research on bounded rationality, cognitive biases, and nudging in public organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 304–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussu, S. (2015). Between a rock and a hard place: The councillor's dilemma between strong mayors and citizens’ needs. Local Government Studies, 41(6), 841–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisty, P., Cheeseman, N., & Power, T. (2012). Rethinking the ‘presidentialism debate': conceptualizing coalitional politics in cross-regional perspective. Democratization, 21(1), 72–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisty, P., Cheeseman, N., & Power, T. J. (2018). Coalitional presidentialism in comparative perspective: Minority presidents in multiparty systems. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, R., & Thomson, R. (2010). The policy impact of leadership in committees: Rapporteurs’ influence on the European Parliament's opinions. European Union Politics, 11(2), 219-240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vrieze, F. (2020). Post-Legislative Scrutiny in Europe: how the oversight on implementation of legislation by parliaments in Europe is getting stronger. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 26(3), 427–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingos, F. D., & Aquino, A. C. B. D. (2019). Competências (não exercidas) das comissões de orçamento e finanças nas câmaras municipais. Revista de Administração Pública, 53(6), 1161–1178.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, O. (1987). Accessibility to news: Sources of information for Japanese politicians. Government Information Quarterly, 4(4), 371–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., Winter, S., & Metzger, M. J. (2018). Making sense of credibility in complex information environments: the role of message sidedness, information source, and thinking styles in credibility evaluation online. Information, Communication & Society, 23(7), 1038–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines, B. J., Goodwin, M., Bates, S. H., & Sin, G. (2019). The study of legislative committees. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 25(3), 331–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaylord, S. (2010). Delegation and defensive legislative strategies in Brazil. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(1), 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., Baekgaard, M., Decramer, A., Audenaert, M., & Goeminne, S. (2020). Institutional isomorphism, negativity bias and performance information use by politicians: A survey experiment. Public Administration, 98(1), 14–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomini, D., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2016). Contextualizing politicians’ uses of accounting information: reassurance and ammunition. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 483–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarini, E. (2016). The day after: newly-elected politicians and the use of accounting information. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 499–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, D., & Cordery, C. J. (2020). Evidence about the value of financial statement audit in the public sector. Public Money & Management. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1729532.
   Google Scholar
• Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing & Management, 44(4), 1467–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, N. (2016). Accrual accounting, politicians and the UK—with the benefit of hindsight. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 477–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge, S., Jorge de Jesus, M. A., & Nogueira, S. (2016). Information brokers and the use of budgetary and financial information by politicians: the case of Portugal. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 515-520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junior, A. M., Pereira, C., & Biderman, C. (2015). The Evolution of Theories about the Brazilian Multiparty Presidential System. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 7(1), 143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, D. (2013). The hidden constitutions: How informal political institutions affect the representation style of local councils. Local Government Studies, 39(5), 681–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, D., & Aquino, A. C. (2019). Financial resilience of municipal civil servants’ pension funds. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 30(81), 425–445.
   Google Scholar
• Lino, A. F., & Aquino, A. C. B. (2020). Organizational wrongdoing in courts of accounts. Revista de Administração Pública, 54(2), 220–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220190270x
   Google Scholar
• Lino, A. F., Azevedo, R. R., Aquino, A. C. B., & Steccolini, I. (2021). Fighting or supporting corruption? The role of public sector audit organizations in Brazil. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102384.
   Google Scholar
• Lucassen, T., & Schraagen, J. M. (2011). Factual accuracy and trust in information: The role of expertise. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1232–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucassen, T., & Schraagen, J. M. (2012). Propensity to trust and the influence of source and medium cues in credibility evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 38(6), 566–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, T. A. (2005). Constructing consensus: Homeland security as a symbol of government politics and administration. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 152–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayweg-Paus, E., & Jucks, R. (2018). Conflicting evidence or conflicting opinions? Two-sided expert discussions contribute to experts’ trustworthiness. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(2), 203–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, M. A., Pereira, C., & Souza, S. (2014). Why do some governments resort to ‘creative accounting’ but not others? Fiscal governance in the Brazilian Federation. International Political Science Review, 35(5), 595–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E. H., & Flanagin, A. J. (2020). Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research, 47(1), 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2016). Political use of performance data. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 479–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2020). Towards parliamentary full cycle engagement in the legislative process: innovations and challenges. The Journal of Legislative Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2020.1765488.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A., & Pedersen, K. (2014). IT portfolio decision-making in local governments: Rationality, politics, intuition and coincidences. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 411–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouda, H. A., & Klischewski, R. (2019). Accounting and politicians: a theory of accounting information usefulness. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(4), 496–517.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. Y. (2017). A lab experiment on committee hearings: Preferences, power, and a quest for information. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 42(1), 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. H., Binderkrantz, A. S., & Christiansen, P. M. (2014). Lobbying across arenas: Interest group involvement in the legislative process in Denmark. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 39(2), 199–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raile, E. D., Pereira, C., & Power, T. J. (2010). The Executive Toolbox: Building Legislative Support in a Multiparty Presidential Regime. Political Research Quarterly, 64(2), 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichard, C. (2016). Can training help to make politicians more active users of performance information? Public Money & Management, 36(7), 481–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, P. F., & Borges, A. (2020). The populist challenge: Multi-level electoral coordination in Brazil's 2018 elections. Regional & Federal Studies, 30(3), 363–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, P. F., & Fabre, E. (2019). Multilevel party organizations in a fragmented presidential system: The case of Brazil. Regional & Federal Studies, 30(4), 525–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringe, N., Victor, J. N., & Cho, W. T. (2017). Legislative networks. The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks, 471.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, M. N., & You, H. Y. (2019). Legislators as lobbyists. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 44(1), 65–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schettini, B. P., & Terra, R. (2019). Electoral incentives and Public Employees’ Retirement Systems in Brazilian municipalities. Public Choice, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C. P. A. D., Puty, C. A. C. B., Silva, M. S. D., Carvalho, S. V. D., & Francês, C. R. L. (2017). Financial forecasts accuracy in Brazil's social security system. Plos one, 12(8), e0184353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapenhurst, R., Johnston, N., & Pelizzo, R. (eds.). (2006). The role of parliaments in curbing corruption. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• van der Voort, H. G., Klievink, A. J., Arnaboldi, M., & Meijer, A. J. (2019). Rationality and politics of algorithms. Will the promise of big data survive the dynamics of public decision-making? Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Helden, J. (2016). Literature review and challenging research agenda on politicians’ use of accounting information. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 531–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Helden, J., Argento, D., Caperchione, E., & Caruana, J. (2016). Politicians and accounting information—a marriage of convenience? Public Money & Management, 36(7), 473–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2017). Surviving information overload: How elite politicians select information. Governance, 30(2), 229–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshinaka, A., McElroy, G., & Bowler, S. (2010). The appointment of rapporteurs in the European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(4), 457–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucco, C., & Power, T. J. (2020). Fragmentation without cleavages? Endogenous fractionalization in the Brazilian party system. Comparative Politics, https://doi.org/10.5129/001041521X15941508069585
   Google Scholar