Land management innovation and sustainability in Victoria, Australia—a longitudinal view

References

• AgVic. (2019). Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• ANZLIC. (1995). ANZLIC Benefits Study. http://www.anzlic.org.au/archive/benefits.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel, A., Casali, L., & Hollanders, H. (2015). How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods. Research Policy, 44(7), 1271–1282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banathy, B. H., & Jenlink, P. M. (2013). Systems inquiry and its application in education. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 49–69). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C. (2017). Leading public design. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• BCG. (1997). Land management and resources information business case—report prepared for Land Victoria. Boston Consulting Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C., & Bugge, M. M. (2013). Public sector innovation—From theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 133–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borins, S. (2001). Innovation, success and failure in public management research: Some methodological reflections. Public Management Review, 3(1), 3–17. doi:10.1080/14616670010009423
   Google Scholar
• Boukamel, O., & Emery, Y. (2017). Evolution of organizational ambidexterity in the public sector and current challenges of innovation capabilities. The Innovation Journal, 22(2), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bysted, R., & Hansen, J. R. (2015). Comparing public and private sector employees’ innovative behaviour: Understanding the role of job and organizational characteristics, job types, and subsectors. Public Management Review, 17(5), 698–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, B., & Marston, G. (2013). How neoliberalism and ecological modernization shaped environmental policy in Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(2), 179–199. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2012.746868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, K., & Coffey, B. (2007). New governance, green planning and sustainability: Tasmania Together and Growing Victoria Together 1. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(1), 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, T., & Worley, C. (1997). Organization change and development. South-Western College Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, S., & Edwards, J. (2019). Improving public services by sharing the right information. Public Money & Management, 39(5), 355–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. Basic Civitas Books.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEDJTR. (2018). Digital Agriculture. Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Deininger, K., Augustinus, C., Enemark, S., & Munro-Faure, P. (2010). Innovations in land rights recognition, administration, and governance. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2519.
   Google Scholar
• DELWP. (2017). A guide to property values—annual data and analysis from Valuer-General Victoria 2017. Government of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Dosen, I., & Graham, M. (2018). Victorian economic snapshot. Pariamentary Library Research and Inquiries Service.
   Google Scholar
• DPC. (2001). Growing Victoria together. Innovative state. Caring communities. Department of Premier and Cabinet.
   Google Scholar
• DPC. (2009). VPS Innovation Action Plan: create collaborate change. Government of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• DSE. (2005). Our environment, our future: Victoria's environmental sustainability framework creating a healthier and a stronger state. Government of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• East, J., & Dempsey, S. (1998). Information needs for precision farming. Agricultural Science, 11, 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers, W. D., & Singh, S. K. (2009). The public innovator's playbook: nurturing bold ideas in government. Harvard Kennedy School.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enemark, S. (2001). Land administration infrastructures for sustainable development. Property Management, 19(5), 366–383.
   Google Scholar
• Enemark, S. (2004). Building land information policies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Special Forum on Building Land Information Policies in the Americas.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: Rationales, lessons and challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(2), 497–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FIG. (2010). Institutional and organisational development. a guide for managers. https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub47/figpub47.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Frentzos, E., Gratsias, K., & Theodoridis, Y. (2007). Towards the next generation of location-based services. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• GA. (2020). Area of Australia—States and Territories. https://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/national-location-information/dimensions/area-of-australia-states-and-territories#heading-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, O. (2017). Public management: 30 years on. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6/7), 547–554. doi:doi:10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, O., & O’Neill, D. (2001). Public management reform: some lessons from the antipodes. In Learning from International Public Management Reform: Part A (pp. 61–75). Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Kamilaris, A., & Ostermann, F. O. (2018). Geospatial Analysis and the Internet of Things. ISPRS internationalJournal of Geo-information, 7(7), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeble, B. R. (1988). The Brundtland report:‘Our common future’. Medicine and War, 4(1), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, S., Schedler, K., Thompson, F., & Jones, L. R. (2003). Dialogue on definition and evolution of the field of public management. International Public Management Review, 4(2), 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, R., & Ouzman, J. (2014). Adoption of precision agriculture-related practices: status, opportunities and the role of farm advisers. In CSIRO Report. GRDC.
   Google Scholar
• LUV. (2019). Land Parcel Information for Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• McMurray, A., Pace, R., & Scott, D. (2004). Research: a commonsense approach. Thomson Social Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, D., & Grant, D. (1997). The Australian National spatial data infrastructure. In D. Rhind (Ed.), Framework for the World (pp. 187–201). Pearson Professional Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nählinder, J., & Eriksson, A. F. (2019). Outcome, process and support: analysing aspects of innovation in public sector organizations. Public Money & Management, 39(6), 443–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newnham, L. (2018). The relationship between workplace innovation and organizational culture: a case study of a Victorian public sector organization. RMIT University. https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/eserv/rmit:162438/Newnham.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Newnham, L., & McMurray, A. (2007). Land management innovation and sustainability: the flow on effects of organizational change. Paper presented at the ICSB World Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Newnham, L., Millner, J., & Sventgyoryi, E. (2005). Innovation and the spatial information economy, Victoria's experience. Paper presented at the SSI Spatial Intelligence, Innovation and Praxis, National Biennial Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Newnham, L., Spall, A., & O'Keeffe, E. (2001). New forms for government land administration-Land Victoria, a case study of the trend towards combining land administration functions and the resulting benefits to the community. Paper presented at the International Federation of Surveyors Working Week.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). OECD’s reviews of innovation policy: Sweden. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017a). Government at a Glance 2017. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: The five strategies for reinventing government. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., Brandsen, T., Mele, V., Nemec, J., & Flemig, S. (2020). Risking innovation. Understanding risk and public service innovation—evidence from a four nation study. Public Money & Management, 40(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1621051
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J., & Newnham, L. (2004). Landmanagement in Australia, case study with emphasis on the State of Victoria. Paper presented at the UN, FIG, PC IDEA Inter-regional Special Forum on the Building of Land Information Policies in the Americas.
   Google Scholar
• Pieroni, A., Scarpato, N., & Brilli, M. (2018). Perfomance study in autonomous and connected vehicles. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 96, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Read, A. (2000). Determinants of successful organisational innovation: a review of current research. Journal of ManagementPractice, 3(1), 95–119.
   Google Scholar
• Sands, V., O'Neill, D., & Hodge, G. (2019). Cheaper, better, and more accountable? Twenty-five years of prisons privatisation in Victoria. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78(4), 577–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicilia, M., Sancino, A., Nabatchi, Y., & Guarini, E. (2019). Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a systematic literature review. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 233–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SII. (2005). Precision agriculture - case study. Department of Sustainability and Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, J. (2018). Precision agriculture for sustainability. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing innovation integrating technological, market and organizational change. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ting, L., & Williamson, I. (2001). Land administration and cadastral trends: the impact of the changing humankind-land relationship and major global drivers: the NZ experience. Survey Review, 36(281), 154–174. doi:10.1179/sre.2001.36.281.154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting, L., & Williamson, I. P. (1999). Cadastral trends: a synthesis. The Australian Surveyor, 4(1), 6–54.
   Google Scholar
• Torugsa, N., & Arundel, A. (2016). Complexity of innovation in the public sector: A workgroup level analysis of related factors and outcomes. Public Management Review, 18(3), 392–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN/FIG. (1999). The Bathurst declaration on land administration for sustainable development. www.fig.net/pub/figpub/pubindex.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Vancauwenberghe, G., & van Loenen, B. (2018). Exploring the emergence of open spatial data infrastructures: analysis of recent developments and trends in Europe. In S. Saeed, T. Ramayah, & Z. Mahmood (Eds.), User centric e-government: challenges and opportunities. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• VicGov. (2017). Public Sector innovation strategy—putting innovation into motion.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. (2006). Building land markets. Land Use Policy, 23(2), 123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, I., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (2008). Understanding land administration systems. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Land Administration Trends and Issues in Asia and the Pacific Region.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, I. P., & Ting, L. (2001). Land administration and cadastral trends: a framework for re-engineering. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 25, 339–366.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar