Empowering first-line managers as change leaders towards co-creation culture: the role of facilitated sensemaking

References

• Aasen, T. M., & Amundsen, O. (2013). Innovation som kollektiv prestation. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010102
   Google Scholar
• Ahrenfelt, B. (2013). Förändring som tillstånd: att leda förändrings- och utvecklingsarbete i företag och organisationer. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/11.1.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, S., Stanley, T., Colombian, C., & Pereira, T. (2019). Strengths-based approach: practice framework and practice handbook. Department of Health and Social Care.
   Google Scholar
• Batalden, M., Batalden, P., & Margolis, P. (2015). Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25(7), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, J., & West, J. (2015). Values, ethics, and dilemmas. Public service ethics. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A., & Brandsen, T. (2016). Social innovations as messages: democratic experimentation in local welfare systems. In T. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Social innovations in the urban context. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, J. (2002). Complexity and innovation in organizations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemer, L. (2012). Organisational identities in networks: sense-giving and sense-taking in the salmon farming industry. The IMP Journal, 6(3), 240–254. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/93704
   Google Scholar
• Iveroth, E., & Hallencreutz, J. (2016). Effective organizational change: leading through sensemaking. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jönköping kommun. (2016). 10 förbättringar från Dialogen. Socialtjänsten.
   Google Scholar
• Jönköping kommun. (2018). En sammanhållen socialtjänst. Socialtjänsten.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M. (2019). Brukarkunskap och upphandling. In O. Segnestam Larsson (Ed.), Upphandlad. Idealistas.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.31767217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeth, M. K., Jones, M. D., & Shanahan, E. A. (2014). The narrative policy framework. In P. Sabatier, & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of policy process. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2009). Towards a paradigm of democratic participation: citizen participation and co-production of personal social services in Sweden. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(2), 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00384.x
   Google Scholar
• SFS. (1993). The Act concerning support and service for persons with functional impairments. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs. https://www.independentliving.org/docs3/englss.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, S., Mazzei, M., Baglioni, S., & Roy, M. J. (2018). Social innovation, social enterprise, and local public services: Undertaking transformation? Social Policy Administration, 52(7), 1317–1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. (2009). Swedish disability policy—service and care for people with functional impairments. Socialstyrelsen. https://www.mindbank.info/item/1201.
   Google Scholar
• Stigliani, I., & Ravasi, D. (2012). Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: Material practices and the transition from individual to group-level prospective sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1232–1259. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streatfield, P. (2001). The Paradox of Control in Organisations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Sørenssen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2016). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: barriers, drivers, benefits and ways forward. Administration and Society, 51(5), 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen, P., & Stenval, J. (2014). The evolution of public services from co-production to co-creation and beyond. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 10(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLPS-03-2014-0002
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliff, K. M., & Obstfeldt, D. (2005). Organising and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar