THEME: SOCIAL INNOVATION IN PUBLIC SERVICES—INNOVATING ‘CO-CREATIVE’ RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SERVICES, CITIZENS AND COMMUNITIES?
Guest editors: Sue Baines, Rob Wilson, Inga Narbutaite Aflaki, Aldona Wiktorska-Święcka, Andrea Bassi and Harri Jalonen
Editorial: Innovating ‘co-creative’ relationships between services, citizens and communities

References

• Agostini, C. (2022). Innovazione sociale e reti per il welfare: I’esperienza di Bergamo nell’emergenza pandemica [Social innovation and welfare networks: Bergamo's experience in the pandemic emergency]. In M. Franca (Ed.), Il ritorno dello Stato sociale? Mercato, Terzo Settore e comunità oltre la pandemia. Quinto Rapporto sul secondo welfare (pp. 283–310). Giappichelli Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Bassi, A. (2022). Debate: The unintended consequences of co-creation in public services—The role of professionals and of civil society organizations. Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1987630
   Google Scholar
• Bassi, A., Baines, S., Csoba, J., & Sipos, F. (2019). Social investment in theory and praxis: A ‘quiet revolution’ in innovative local services? In S. Baines, A. Bassi, J. Csoba, & F. Sipos (Eds.), Implementing innovative social investment: Strategic lessons from Europe (pp. 195–213). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., Flemig, S., Loeffler, E., & Osborne, S. P. (2019). How far have we come with co-production—and what’s next? Public Money & Management, 39(4), 229–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2018). Definitions of co-production and co-creation. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-Production and co-creation: Definitions and theoretical perspectives (pp. 9–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2011). Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Csoba, J., & Sipos, F. (2022). Politically-driven public administration or co-creation? On the possibility of modernizing public services in rural Hungary. Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2026082
   Google Scholar
• Curley, M. (2016). Twelve principles for open innovation 2.0. Nature, 533(7603), 314–316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eseonu, T. (2022). Co-creation as social innovation: Including ‘hard-to-reach’ groups in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1981057
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A., & Brandsen, T. (2016). Social Innovations as messages: Democratic experimentation in local welfare systems. In T. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Social innovations in the urban context (pp. 161–180). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, C., Rosenbach, F., Hameed, T., Dixon, R., & Blundell, J. (2022). New development: Rallying together—The rationale for and structure of collaborative practice in England. Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1981628
   Google Scholar
• Fox, C., Baines, S., Wilson, R., Jalonen, H., Narbutaite Aflaki, I., Prandini, R., Bassi, A., Ganugi, G., & Aramo-Immonen, H. (2021). A new agenda for co-creating public services. Turku University of Applied Sciences. http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522167842.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon, J., & Rutter, N. (2022). Social enterprise in prisons: Enabling innovation and co-creation. Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.2001202
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, R., Fox, C., Baines, S., & Albertson, K. (2013). Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges? Locating the concept in theory and practice. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(4), 436–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardyman, W., Garner, S., Lewis, J. J., Callaghan, R., Williams, E., Dalton, A., & Turner, A. (2022). Enhancing public service innovation through value co-creation: Capacity building and the ‘innovative imagination’. Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1981042
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (2014). Eight and a half propositions to stimulate frugal innovation. Public Money & Management, 34(3), 227–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, P. (2022). Debate: The role of participatory arts within co-creation/social innovation. Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1981640
   Google Scholar
• Jalonen, H. (2022). New development: Complexity-informed interpretation of social innovation. Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1981039
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D., & Martin, M. (2022). New development: Supporting co-creation processes through modelling. Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1996929
   Google Scholar
• Kangro, K., & Katri-Liis Lepik, K.-L. (2022). Co-creating public services in social hackathons: Adapting the original hackathon concept. Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1940584
   Google Scholar
• Marques, P., Morgan, K., & Richardson, R. (2017). Social innovation in question: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept. Environment and Planning C, 36(3), 496–512.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (Eds.). (2013). The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Narbutaité Aflaki, I., & Lindh, M. (2021). Empowering first-line managers as change leaders towards co-creation culture: the role of facilitated sensemaking. Public Money & Management. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.2007636
   Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S., Novy, A., & Kazepov, Y. (Eds.). (2019). Local social innovation to combat poverty and exclusion. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabato, S., Vanhercke, B., & Verschraegen, G. (2017). Connecting entrepreneurship with policy experimentation? The EU framework for social innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(2), 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowbridge, H., & Willoughby, M. (2022). Debate: Re-humanizing the system—How storytelling can be used to bridge the divide between services and citizens. Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1981014
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiktorska-Święcka, A. (2021). Co-creation of public services in the European Union: Concepts, approaches and practice. Polish Political Science Review, 9(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/ppsr-2021-0009
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. (2022). Debate: Participatory budgeting—The ultimate way to co-create services for social innovation? Public Money & Management, 42(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1981041
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Maniatopoulos, G., Martin, M., & McLoughlin, I. (2012). Innovating relationships: Taking a co-productive approach to the shaping of telecare services for older people. Information Communication and Society, 15(7), 1136–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar