Gendering digital education: A role model for public management

References

• Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2021). New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancarani, A., Arcidiacono, F., Mauro, C. D., & Giammanco, M. D. (2021). Promoting work engagement in public administrations: The role of middle managers’ leadership. Public Management Review, 23(8), 1234–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1763072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, C., Catuogno, S., Saggese, S., & Sarto, F. (2021). The adoption of e-Health in public hospitals. Unfolding the gender dimension of TMT and line managers. Public Management Review, 23(10), 1553–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1775280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argento, D., & van Helden, J. (2021). New development: University managers balancing between sense and sensibility. Public Money & Management, 41(6), 487–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1890923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvate, P. R., Galilea, G. W., & Todescat, I. (2018). The queen bee: A myth? The effect of top-level female leadership on subordinate females. Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 615–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00062-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagilhole, B. (2002). Women in non-traditional occupations: Challenging men. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Balyer, A., & Öz, Ö. (2018). Academicians’ views on digital transformation in education. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(4), 809–830. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/441/295.
   Google Scholar
• Beaman, L., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2009). Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1497–1540. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40506265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowerman, B. L., & O’Connell, R. T. (1990). Linear statistical models: An applied approach (2^nd Ed.). PWS-Kent Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. E., & Wolbrecht, C. (2006). See Jane run: Women politicians as role models for adolescents. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 233–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, P., George, E., & Lawrence, S. A. (2004). Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement, and uncertainty reduction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 892–900. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colasanti, N., Frondizi, R., & Meneguzzo, M. (2018). Higher education and stakeholders’ donations: successful civic crowdfunding in an Italian university. Public Money & Management, 38(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1449471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cricelli, L., Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Llanes Dueñas, L. P. (2018). Intellectual capital and university performance in emerging countries: Evidence from Colombian public universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2017-0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paola, M., Ponzo, M., & Scoppa, V. (2018). Are men given priority for top jobs? Investigating the glass ceiling in Italian Academia. Journal of Human Capital, 12(3), 475-503. http://doi.org/10.1086/698133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, B., Ellemers, N., Van Laar, C., & De Groot, K. (2011). Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee? British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X525280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faniko, K., Ellemers, N., & Derks, B. (2016). Queen Bees and Alpha Males: Are successful women more competitive than successful men? European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(7), 903–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2001). The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00166-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filandri, M., & Pasqua, S. (2021). Being good isn’t good enough: gender discrimination in Italian academia. Studies in Higher Education, 46(8), 1533–1551. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1693990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flory, J. A., Gneezy, U., Leonard, K. L., & List, J. A. (2018). Gender, age, and competition: A disappearing gap? Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 150, 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, K. D. (2015). Gendered governing? Women’s leadership styles and participatory institutions in Brazil. Political Research Quarterly, 68(3), 564–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915589130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R., & López-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55(1-2), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9068-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomin, M., Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2021). Gender stereotypes explain different mental prototypes of male and female leaders. Leadership Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., Dobija, D., & Strzelczyk, W. (2020). The impact of competing institutional pressures and logics on the use of performance measurement in hybrid universities. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(4), 818–844. http://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1684328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Babin, B., Money, A. H., & Samouel, P. (2003). Essentials of business research methods. Johns Wiley & Sons. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E., & Parks-Stamm, E. J. (2007). Gender stereotypes in the workplace: Obstacles to women's career progress. In S. J. Correll (Ed.), Social psychology of gender: Advances in group processes, (Vol. 24, pp. 47–77). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Heyden, M. L., Sidhu, J. S., & Volberda, H. W. (2018). The conjoint influence of top and middle management characteristics on management innovation. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1505–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315614373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt, C. L., & Simon, S. (2011). Female leaders: Injurious or inspiring role models for women? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310385216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, J., Asztalos Morell, I., & Lindell, E. (2020). Gendering the digitalized metal industry. Gender Work Organization, 27(6), 1321–1345. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Kang, T. H. (2020). Effects of supervisor gender on promotability of female managers. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, S. (2020). The future of business education: A commentary in the shadow of the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research, 117, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., & Park, S. (2021). Civil servants’ perceptions of agency heads’ leadership styles: the role of gender in public sector organizations. Public Management Review, 23(8), 1160–1183. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1730941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, R., Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Nappo, F. (2019). Entrepreneurial universities and strategy: The case of the University of Bari. Management Decision, 57(12), 3387–3405. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2018-0690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H., Silvester, J., Bilimoria, D., Jané, S., Sealy, R., Peters, K., Möltner, H., Huse, M., & Göke, J. (2018). Women in power: Contributing factors that impact on women in organizations and politics. Psychological research and best practice. Organizational Dynamics, 47(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ORGDYN.2017.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muchiri, M. K., Cooksey, R. W., Di Milia, L. V., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2011). Gender and managerial level differences in perceptions of effective leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(5), 462–492. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9302.00289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2002). Theme: Gender, the professions and public management: Changing governance, changing equality? New labour, modernization and public services. Public Money and Management, 22(1), 7–14. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9302.00289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niehaves, B., & Plattfaut, R. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 708–726. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1057/ejis.2013.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010a). Women directors’ contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2009.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010b). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2021). Gender and performance in public organizations: A research synthesis and research agenda. Public Management Review, 23(6), 929–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1730940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks-Stamm, E. J., Heilman, M. E., & Hearns, K. A. (2008). Motivated to penalize: Women's strategic rejection of successful women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, T. V., Nghiem, T. T., Nguyen, L. M. T., Mai, T. X., & Tran, T. (2019). Exploring key competencies of mid-level academic managers in higher education in Vietnam. Sustainability, 11(23), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QS. (2019). World university rankings. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 31(2), 350–371. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2984219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. E. (2015). On the edge of a glass cliff: Women in leadership in public organizations. Public Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 484–517. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.15946abstract
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á. (2019). Digital learning: Developing skills for digital transformation of organizations. Future Generation Computer Systems, 91, 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.08.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teelken, C., Taminiau, Y., & Rosenmöller, C. (2021). Career mobility from associate to full professor in academia: micro-political practices and implicit gender stereotypes. Studies in Higher Education, 46(4), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1655725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, M. (2008). Where are the women? The swing from EEO to diversity in the academy. Gender Relations Centre, working paper, No.22. Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Torchia, M., Calabro, A., Gabaldon, P., & Kanadli, S. B. (2018). Women directors contribution to organizational innovation: A behavioural approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, 1(2), 15–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrowicz, J., Terjesen, S., & Mazurek, J. (2020). All on board? New evidence on board gender diversity from a large panel of European firms. European Management Journal, 38(4), 634–645. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M., Roman, A., Wang, X., & Liu, C. (2019). Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: identifying the elements of e-leadership. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316681446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, R. P., & Brazil, D. M. (2007). Leadership and sex-similarity: A comparison in a military setting. Personnel Psychology, 60(2), 303–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00075.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, V. M. (2006). Exploring the causal story: Gender, active representation, and bureaucratic priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muj012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2015). Two traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles, 73(11-12), 461–473. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0480-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar