Voluntary adoption of the International Standards on Auditing (ISA) in local government audits—empirical evidence from Finland

References

• Adhikari, P., Kuruppu, C., & Matilal, S. (2013). Dissemination and institutionalization of public sector accounting reforms in less developed countries: A comparative study of the Nepalese and Sri Lankan central governments. Accounting Forum, 37(3), 213–230.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities. (2022). Finnish municipalities and regions. https://www.localfinland.fi/finnish-municipalities-and-regions.
   Google Scholar
• Bisogno, M., Grossi, G., Manes-Rossi, F., & Santis, S. (2022). Standardizing local governments’ audit reports: For better or for worse? Public Money & Management, DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2064563
   Google Scholar
• Boolaky, P. K., & Soobaroyen, T. (2017). Adoption of International Standards on Auditing (ISA): Do institutional factors matter? International Journal of Auditing, 21(1), 59–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broberg, P., Tagesson, T., Argento, D., Gyllengahm, N., & Mårtensson, O. (2017). Explaining the influence of time budget pressure on audit quality in Sweden. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(2), 331–350.
   Google Scholar
• Brusca, I., Caperchione, E., Cohen, S., & Rossi, F. M. (eds.). (2015). Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, V. L., & Feroz, E. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four U.S. State Governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 565–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J., Vanhee, C., Manes-Rossi, F., Aversano, N., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2015). The effect of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial reporting: an international comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(1), 158–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin, S.-O. Y., Tagesson, T., Andersson, A., Cato, J., & Hansson, K. (2009). Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations: Positive accounting theory and institutional theory as competitive or concurrent theories. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), 141–174.
   Google Scholar
• Coram, P., Ng, J., & Woodliff, D. (2003). A survey of time budget pressure and reduced audit quality among Australian auditors. Australian Accounting Review, 13(29), 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dacin, M. T., & Dacin, P. A. (2008). Traditions as institutionalized practice: Implications for deinstitutionalization. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, C. M. (2001). Financial accounting theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Degeling, P., Anderson, J., & Guthrie, J. (1996). Accounting for public accounts committees. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(2), 30–49.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W.. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), 345–368.
   Google Scholar
• Halim, A., Sutrisno, T., Rosidi, & Achsin, M. (2014). Effect of competence and auditor independence on audit quality with audit time budget and professional commitment as a moderation variable. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 3(6), s. 64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, D., & Cordery, C. (2018). The value of public sector audit: Literature and history. Journal of Accounting Literature, 40, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2022). A new standard for audits of less complex entities. https://www.iaasb.org/focus-areas/new-standard-less-complex-entities.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, Å, Meklin, P., Oulasvirta, L., & Vakkuri, L. (2004). Governance structures and contracting out municipal auditing in Finland and Norway. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(4), 445–477.
   Google Scholar
• Julkishallinnon ja -talouden tilintarkastajat ry. (2012). Kuntien mukautetut tilintarkastuskertomukset (Modified audit reports in municipalities).
   Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice, 32(Supplement 1), 385–421.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., & Miller, P. (2019). Transforming the public sector: 1998–2018. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2211–2252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local Government Act. (365/1995). (Kuntalaki 365/1995).
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Act. (410/2015). (Kuntalaki 410/2015).
   Google Scholar
• Manes Rossi, F., Cohen, S., Caperchione, E., & Brusca, I. (2016). Harmonizing public sector accounting in Europe: Thinking out of the box. Public Money & Management, 36(3), 189–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manes Rossi, F., Brusca, I., & Condor, V. (2021). In the pursuit of harmonization: Comparing the audit systems of European local governments. Public Money & Management, 41(8), 604–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattei, G., Grossi, G., & Guthrie, J. (2021). Exploring past, present and future trends in public sector auditing research: A literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(7), 94–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, L. (2014). The reluctance of a developed country to choose International Public Sector Accounting Standards of the IFAC. A critical case study. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25, 272–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, L., Uoti, A., Ojala, H., Saastamoinen, J., Pesu, J., Kettunen, J., Paananen, M., Anttila, V., & Lindgren, H. (2021). Kuntien tilintarkastuksen laatu ja toimivuus: Nykytila ja kehittämistarpeet. Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja, 2021, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2006). Auditing as a public good and the regulation of auditing. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 6(2), 329–360.
   Google Scholar
• Suomen tilintarkastajat ry. (2020). Julkishallinnon hyvä tilintarkastustapa (Good chartered public finance auditing practice). https://tilintarkastajat.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/julkishallinnon-hyva-tilintarkastustapa-final-01062020-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tagesson, T., Glinatsi, N., & Prahl, M. (2015). Procurement of audit services in the municipal sector: The impact of competition. Public Money & Management, 35(4), 273–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepalagul, N., & Lin, L. (2015). Auditor independence and audit quality: A literature review. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30(1), 101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Vaasa Court of Appeals. (2019). Judgment 31.1.2019, Number 19/104154.
   Google Scholar
• Vakkuri, J., Meklin, P., & Oulasvirta, L. (2006). Emergence of markets—instututional change of municipal auditing in Finland. Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier, 1- 2006, Fagbokforlaget, 31–55.
   Google Scholar