References
- Bergmann, A. (2022). Editorial: Use of accounting information by politicians. Public Money & Management, 42(8), 573. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2126625
- Bo, L., Jiang, L., Mear, F. C. J., & Zhang, S. (2022). New development: Implicit government debt in China—past, present and future. Public Money & Management. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2147290
- Budding, T., & van Helden, J. (2022). Theme: Politicians’ use of accounting information. Editorial: Unraveling politicians’ use and non-use of accounting information. Public Money & Management, 42(3), 137–139. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2028467
- Christensen, M. (2022). Debate: Accounting information performativity and politicians’ use (or not). Public Money & Management, DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2114156,
- Cohen, S. (2022). Debate: Accounting training for politicians—an alternative approach. Public Money & Management. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2107826
- Karatzimas, S. (2021). Government accounting literacy as an attribute of smart citizenship. Public Money & Management. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1965311
- Kroll, A. (2022). Debate: Expanding research on politicians’ data use. Public Money & Management. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2103316
- Polzer, T., & Seiwald, J. (2022). Debate: The role of intermediaries between demand and supply of performance information—the missing link? Public Money & Management, DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2100130
- Thanh Dung Tran, C., & Dollery, B. (2021). Does financial sustainability affect local resident satisfaction? The case of the Victorian local government system. Public Money & Management, DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1987629
- Weiss, J. (2022). Debate: If politicians hardly care about performance information (in the annual budget), who cares about performance and when? Public Money & Management, DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2022.2103315