When innovation comes to town—the institutional logics driving change in municipalities

References

• Acuto, M., & Leffel, B. (2021). Understanding the global ecosystem of city networks. Urban Studies, 58(9), 1758–1774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020929261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agger, A., & Sørensen, E. (2018). Managing collaborative innovation in public bureaucracies. Planning Theory, 17(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216672500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation : co-creating for a better society. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440. Doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg Johansen, C., & Waldorff, S. B. (2015). What are institutional logics—and where is the perspective taking us? Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1), https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.14380abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund-Snodgrass, L., & Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2020). Conceptualizing testbed planning: urban planning in the intersection between experimental and public sector logics. Urban Planning, 5(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, C., & Bugge, M. M. (2013). Public sector innovation—From theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and innovation in the public sector. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730210449357
   Google Scholar
• Brorström, S. (2015). Implementing innovative ideas in a city: Good solutions on paper but not in practice? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(3), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-11-2014-0137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Barberg, B., Crosby, B. C., & Patton, M. Q. (2021). Leading social transformations: creating public value and advancing the common good. Journal of Change Management, 21(2), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1917492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Walker, R. M., & Sawhney, M. (2019). Public service innovation: a typology. Public Management Review, 22(11), 1674–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Rovik, K. A. (2020). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Hansen, T., & Rekers, J. V. (2015). Innovation policy for grand challenges. an economic geography perspective. Geography Compass, 9(9), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945
   Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.2307/259140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2002). A tale of three cities: Or the glocalization of city management. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, M. B., & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 114–149. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eneqvist, E., & Karvonen, A. (2021). Experimental governance and urban planning futures: five strategic functions for municipalities in local innovation. Urban Planning, 6(1), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., & Bach, M. (2018). Transition management in and for cities: introducing a new governance approach to address urban challenges. In N. Frantzeskaki, K. Hölscher, M. Bach, & F. Avelino (Eds.), Co-­creating sustainable urban futures: a primer on applying transition management in cities (pp. 1–40). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T., & Hubbard, P. (1996). The entrepreneurial city: new urban politics, new urban geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 20(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259602000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., & Knell, L. (2022). Innovation, exnovation and intelligent failure. Public Money & Management, 42(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1965307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2013). Circuits of knowledge and techniques: the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1510–1526. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., Janssen, M. J., Wesseling, J. H., & Negro, S. O. (2020). Mission-oriented innovation systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmar, U. (2019). The institutionalization of public sector innovation. Public Management Review, 23(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1665702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2-3), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)e0001-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K., Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2018). Empowering actors in transition management in and for cities. In N. Frantzeskaki, K. Hölscher, M. Bach, & F. Avelino (Eds.), Co-­creating sustainable urban futures: a primer on applying transition management in cities (pp. 131–158). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2021). Perspectives on urban transformation research: transformations in, of, and by cities. Urban Transformations, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00019-z
   Google Scholar
• Hrelja, R., Isaksson, K., & Richardson, T. (2012). IKEA and small city development in sweden: planning myths, realities, and unsustainable mobilities. International Planning Studies, 17(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2012.672797
   Google Scholar
• Invest Stockholm. (2021). Stockholm får nytt innovationsdistrikt för hållbar stadsutveckling [Press release]. https://press.investstockholm.se/posts/pressreleases/stockholm-far-nytt-innovationsdistrikt-for-ha.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2020). Innovation management—Fundamentals and vocabulary.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1998). The enterprise of narrative and the narrative of enterprise: place marketing and the entrepreneurial city. In T. Hall, & P. Hubbard (Eds.), The entrepreneurial city: Geographies of politics, regime and representation (pp. 77–99). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Moulaert, F., Hulgard, L., et al. (2013). Social innovation research: a new stage in innovation analysis? In F. Moulaert, D. MacCullum, & A. Mehmood et al. (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 110–130). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. (2014). Cities, systems of innovation and economic development. Innovation, 10(2-3), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.146
   Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtmollaiev, S., Fjuk, A., Pedersen, P. E., Clatworthy, S., & Kvale, K. (2018). Organizational transformation through service design: The institutional logics perspective. Journal of Service Research, 21(1), 59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1989). Politics and the limits of modernity. Social Text, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/827809
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M., Ricard, L. M., Klijn, E. H., & Ysa, T. (2017). Innovation in city governments: structures, networks, and leadership. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (1998). Utbildning och kommunal utvecklingspolitik. Kommunal ekonomi och politik, 2(2), 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. J. (2012). Regional social capital: why it matters. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.607806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, H., Sager, F., Kaufmann, D., & Warland, M. (2016). Capital city dynamics: Linking regional innovation systems, locational policies and policy regimes. Cities, 51, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P., Baker, T., Sisson, A., Dowling, R., & Maalsen, S. (2022). Innovating urban governance: A research agenda. Progress in Human Geography, https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221127298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Municipality. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., & Rader Olsson, A. (2013). Sustainable Stockholm: exploring urban sustainability in Europe’s greenest city. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. E., Egger-Peitler, I., Höllerer, M. A., & Hammerschmid, G. (2014). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 861–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 1000–1014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205285182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701763161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhtar-Landgren, D., Kronsell, A., Voytenko Palgan, Y., & von Wirth, T. (2019). Municipalities as enablers in urban experimentation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(6), 718–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2019.1672525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nählinder, J., & Eriksson, A. F. (2019). Outcome, process and support: analysing aspects of innovation in public sector organizations. Public Money & Management, 39(6), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1559617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems. a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, L. (2013). Vad är, vad gör, vem bestämmer—Kommunerna 1863–2013. In S. K. o. Landsting (Ed.), 150 år av självstyrelse. Kommuner och landsting i förändring (pp. 12–343.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, T. H., Solstad, E., & Torsteinsen, H. (2017). The meaning of institutional logics for performance assessment in boards of municipal companies. Public Money & Management, 37(6), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1344015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2013). Introduction: innovation in public services. In Handbook of Innovation in Public Services. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm, J., & Wihlborg, E. (2007). Hur kan kommuner styra sociotekniska system-exempel från bredband och energisystemen. Tema Teknik och social förändring, Linköpings universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Panebianco, S. (2008). Are entrepreneurial cities more successful? Empirical evidence from 50 German cities. In P. Ache, H. T. Andersen, T. Maloutas, M. Raco, & T. Taşan-Kok (Eds.), Cities between competitiveness and cohesion: Discourses, realities and implementation (Vol. 93, pp. 41-60). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510394010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2012). New perspectives on public services: place and technology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Hupe, P. (2011). Talking about government: the role of magic concepts. Public Management Review, 13(5), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.532963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, & R. Suddaby, & Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–42). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syssner, J. (2012). Världens bästa plats?: platsmarknadsföring, makt och medborgarskap. Nordic Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. (2016). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viable Cities. (n.d.). What is Viable Cities? https://en.viablecities.se/om-viable-cities.
   Google Scholar
• Waldorff, S. B. (2013). Accounting for organizational innovations: Mobilizing institutional logics in translation. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, K. (2003). Entrepreneurial urbanism, state restructuring and civilizing ‘new’ east Manchester. Area, 35(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisenfeld, U., & Hauerwaas, A. (2018). Adopters build bridges: Changing the institutional logic for more sustainable cities. From action to workset to practice. Research Policy, 47(5), 911–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M. (2016). Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy. Cities, 51, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M., Borgström, S., & Farrelly, M. (2019). Urban transformative capacity: From concept to practice. Ambio, 48(5), 437–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01169-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar