1,117
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
New developments

New development: Covid 19 and changes in public administration—what do we know to date?

, &

References

  • Aristovnik, A., Kovač, P., Murko, E., Ravšelj, D., Umek, L., Bohatá, M., Hirsch, B., Schäffer, F. S., & Tomaževič, N. (2021). The use of ICT by local general administrative authorities during Covid-19 for a sustainable future: Comparing five European countries. Sustainability, 13(21), 11765. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111765
  • Boin, A., Brock, K., Craft, J., Halligan, J., ‘T Hart, P., Roy, J., Tellier, G., & Turnbull, L. (2020). Beyond Covid-19: Five commentaries on expert knowledge, executive action, and accountability in governance and public administration. Canadian Public Administration, 63(3), 339–368. doi: 10.1111/capa.12386
  • Colley, L., Woods, S., & Head, B. (2022). Pandemic effects on public service employment in Australia. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 33(1), 56–79. doi: 10.1177/10353046211056093
  • Criado, J. I., & Guevara-Gómez, A. (2021). Public sector, open innovation, and collaborative governance in lockdown times. A research of Spanish cases during the COVID-19 crisis. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(4), 612–626. doi: 10.1108/TG-08-2020-0242
  • Datta, P., & Nwankpa, J. K. (2021). Digital transformation and the COVID-19 crisis continuity planning. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases, 11(2), 81–89. doi: 10.1177/2043886921994821
  • Dos Santos, L. A., De Santana Ribeiro, L. C., & De Cerqueira, R. B. (2020). The informal sector and Covid-19 economic impacts: The case of Bahia, Brazil. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 12(6), 1273–1285. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12366
  • Dunlop, C. A., Ongaro, E., & Baker, K. (2020). Researching Covid 19: A research agenda for public policy and administration scholars. Public Policy and Administration, 35(4), 365–383. doi: 10.1177/0952076720939631
  • Eriksson, E., Gadolin, C., Lindahl, G., Alexandersson, P., & Eriksson, J. (2021). Public management in turbulent times: COVID-19 as an ecosystem disruptor. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 80(4), 732–747. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12525
  • Fernandes, S. (2021). Which way to cope with COVID-19 challenges? Contributions of the IoT for smart city projects. Bid Data and Cognitive Computing, 5(2), 26. doi: 10.3390/bdcc5020026
  • Gabryelczyk, R. (2020). Has COVID-19 accelerated digital transformation? Initial lessons learnerd for public administration. Information Systems Management, 34(4), 303–309. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2020.1820633
  • Giauque, D., Renard, K., & Emery, Y. (2022). Engagement, exhaustion, and perceived performance of public employees before and during the COVID-19 crisis. Public Personnel Management, 51(3), 263–290. doi: 10.1177/00910260211073154
  • Gofen, A., & Lotta, G. (2021). Street-level bureaucrats at the forefront of pandemic response: A comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(1), 3–15.
  • Hernandez, T. A. (2021). The consequences of the austerity policies for public services in the UK. Studies in Social Justice, 15(3), 518–537. doi: 10.26522/ssj.v15i3.2568
  • Horvat, M., Piątek, W., Potěšil, L., & Rozsnyai, K. F. (2021). Public administration’s adaptation to COVID-19 pandemic—Czech, Hungarian, Polish and Slovak experience. Central European Public Administration Review, 19(1), 133–158. doi: 10.17573/cepar.2021.1.06
  • Hu, Q., & Liu, Y. (2022). Crisis management and national responses to Covid 19: Global perspectives. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(4), 737–750. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2022.2079692
  • Jha, H. (2022). Interrogating the resurgence of administrative state: Ideas and state capacity. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(4), 513–529. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-07-2021-0172
  • Joyce, F., Maron, F., & Reddy, P. S. (2020). Good public governance in a global pandemic. IIAS.
  • Klich, A. (2021). Electronic communication with public administration in the time of COVID 19—Poland’s Experience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 1–14. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020685
  • Malandrino, A., & Demichelis, E. (2020). Conflict in decision making and variation in public administration outcomes in Italy during the COVID-19 crisis. European Policy Analysis, 6(2), 138–146. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1093
  • Mauro, M., & Giancotti, M. (2021). Italian responses to the COVID-19 emergency: Overthrowing 30 years of health reforms? Health Policy, 125(4), 548–552. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.12.015
  • Miao, Q., Schwarz, S., & Schwarz, G. (2021). Responding to COVID-19: Community volunteerism and coproduction in China. World Development, 137, 105128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105128
  • Nagel, L. (2020). The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the digital transformation of work. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(9/10), 861–875. doi: 10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0323
  • Nograšek, J., & Vintar, M. (2014). E-government and organizational transformation of government: Black box revisited? Government Information Quarterly, 31, 108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.07.006
  • OECD. (2020). The territorial impact of COVID-19: Managing the crisis across levels of government.
  • PRISMA. (2020). PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases and registers only. https://prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMA_2020_flow_diagram_new_SRs_v1.docx.
  • Prusty, K. S., & Mahapatra, D. (2021). Demand smoothing response by street-level bureaucrats (SLB) in delivering public services during COVID-19 scenario: A system dynamics modelling study. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4), https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2633
  • Raghavan, A., Demircioglu, M. A., & Orazgaliyev, S. (2021). COVID-19 and the new normal of organizations and employees: An overview. Sustainability, 13(21), 11942. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111942
  • Rajala, T., & Jalonen, H. (2022). Stress tests for public service resilience: Introducing the possible-worlds thinking. Public Management Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2048686
  • Shand, R., Parker, S., Liddle, J., Spolander, G., Warwick, L., & Ainsworth, S. (2022). After the applause: Understanding public management and public service ethos in the fight against Covid-19. Public Management Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2026690
  • Shen, Y., Cheng, Y. D., & Yu, J. (2022). From recovery resilience to transformative resilience: How digital platforms reshape public service provision during and post COVID-19. Public Management Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2033052
  • Susilawati, D. M., Suryanto, & Windijarto (2021). Transforming the digital leadership to improve public service performance in the COVID-19 outbreak. Economic Annals-XXI, 188(3-4), 31–38.
  • Switzer, D., Wang, & Hirschvogel, L. (2020). Municipal utilities and COVID-19: challenges, responses, and collaboration. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(6-7), 577–583. doi: 10.1177/0275074020941711
  • Tung, L. T. (2021). Success in combating a pandemic: Role of fast policy responses. World Development Perspectives, 21), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100285
  • Vasiliev, V. P. (2022). Post-pandemic trends in the development of social state institutions. Postmodern Openings, 13(1), 480–493. doi: 10.18662/po/13.1Sup1/437
  • Wang, H., Qi, H., & Ran, B. (2022). Public–private collaboration led by private organizations in combating crises: Evidence from China's fighting against Covid 19. Administration & Society, 54(1), 3–28.
  • Weber, G., Cabras, I., Ometto, P., & Peredo, A. M. (2021). Direct Management of Covid 19 at National and Subnational Level: The Case of the Western Amazon Countries. Public Organization Review, 21, 741–757. doi: 10.1007/s11115-021-00565-x
  • Yeo, J., & Lee, E. S. (2020). Whole community co-production: A full picture behind the successful Covid 19 response in S. Korea. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(2), 248–260. doi: 10.1108/TG-05-2020-0088
  • Zaki, B. L., & George, B. (2021). New development: Policy learning and public management—a match made in crisis. Public Money & Management, 42(2), 129–132. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1956212