Antecedents of public managers’ collective implementation efficacy as they actualize new public services

References

• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 265–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). The changing face of psychology at the dawning of a globalization era. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 42(1), 12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 269–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrutia, J. M., & Echebarria, C. (2019). Drivers of exploitative and explorative innovation in a collaborative public sector context. Public Management Review, 21(3), 446–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belschak, F. D., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Pro-self, prosocial, and pro-organizational foci of proactive behaviour: Differential antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 475–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorklund, T., Bhatli, D., & Laakso, M. (2013). Understanding idea advancement efforts in innovation through proactive behaviour. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 15(2), 124–142.
   Google Scholar
• Borgogni, L., Petitta, L., & Mastrorilli, A. (2010). Correlates of collective efficacy in the Italian Air Force. Applied Psychology, 59(3), 515–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., & Paulus, P. B. (2015). CEO ideational facilitation leadership and team creativity: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 49(1), 53–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviours at work. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 43(3), 169–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., & Bliese, P. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 549–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., & Chang, J. Y. (2009). Innovation implementation in the public sector: An integration of institutional and collective dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., & Moon, W. J. (2013). Multiple forms of innovation implementation: The role of innovation, individuals, and the implementation context. Organizational Dynamics, 42(4), 290–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., Price, R. H., & Vinokur, A. D. (2003). Self-efficacy changes in groups: effects of diversity, leadership, and group climate. Journal of Organizational Behaviour: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behaviour, 24(4), 357–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, G. H., & Choi, J. N. (2018). Innovation implementation as a dynamic equilibrium: Emergent processes and divergent outcomes. Group and Organization Management, 43(6), 999–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Duberley, J., & Mallon, M. (2004). Social constructionism in the study of career: Accessing the parts that other approaches cannot reach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(3), 407–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behaviour in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dampérat, M., Jeannot, F., Jongmans, E., & Jolibert, A. (2016). Team creativity: Creative self-efficacy, creative collective efficacy and their determinants. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English edn, 31(3), 6–25.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, J. (2006). Individual innovation: the connection between leadership and employees’ innovative work behaviour (No. R200604). EIM Business and Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative work behaviour: Measurement and validation. EIM Business and Policy Research, 8(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, M. A. (2020). The effects of organizational and demographic context for innovation implementation in public organizations. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1852–1875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681–1691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behaviour? The role of autonomy and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digital Israel National Initiative. (2017). The national digital program of the government of Israel. https://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/news/digital_israel_national_plan/en/The%20National%20Digital%20Program%20of%20the%20Government%20of%20Israel.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Phelps, G., Tortora, R., Swift, K., Kohrell, J., Berck, J., & Messer, B. L. (2009). Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research, 38(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohoo, J., & Katz, S. (2019). Quality implementation: leveraging collective efficacy to make’ what works’ actually work. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Ballesteros, R., Díez-Nicolás, J., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2002). Determinants and structural relation of personal efficacy to collective efficacy. Applied Psychology, 51(1), 107–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller Jr J. B., Marler, L. E., & Hester, K. (2012). Bridge building within the province of proactivity. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 33(8), 1053–1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup Organization. (2011). Innkzobarometer 2010. Analytical report: Innovation in public administration. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Earley, P. C. (2007). Collective cognition in action: accumulation, interaction, examination, and accommodation in the development and operation of group efficacy beliefs in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 438–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 28, 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. A., Parker, S. K., & Mason, C. M. (2010). Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7^th edn). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Holahan, P. J., Aronson, Z. H., Jurkat, M. P., & Schoorman, F. D. (2004). Implementing computer technology: a multiorganizational test of Klein and Sorra’s model. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 31–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J. (2017). The relationship between employee psychological empowerment and proactive behaviour: Self-efficacy as mediator. Social Behaviour and Personality, 45(7), 1157–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., & Ekvall, G. (2010). Managing for innovation: The two faces of tension in creative climates. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 73–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, C. B., & Andersen, L. B. (2014). Performance management for academic researchers: How publication command systems affect individual behaviour. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34, 84–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal, N. K., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity: A multilevel study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 573–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, W., & Gu, Q. (2017). Leader creativity expectations motivate employee creativity: a moderated mediation examination. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(5), 724–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J. H., Matusik, J. G., Kim, T. Y., & Phillips, J. M. (2016). Interactive effects of multiple organizational climates on employee innovative behaviour in entrepreneurial firms: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(6), 628–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S., & Chung, G. H. (2017). Implementing innovations within organizations: A systematic review and research agenda. Innovation, 19(3), 372–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Knight, A. P. (2005). Innovation implementation: Overcoming the challenge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 243–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Schmidt, J., & Schmidt, L. (2006). Collective efficacy beliefs in student work teams: Relation to self-efficacy, cohesion, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 68(1), 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Chen, J., & Tao, Y. (2015). Innovation performance in new product development teams in c hina's technology ventures: the role of behavioural integration dimensions and collective efficacy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A. (1991). The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 288–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, H. P., Patterson, M. G., Birdi, K. S., Leiva, P. I., & Kausel, E. E. (2014). The role of weekly high-activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behaviour: A multilevel and interactional model. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 35, 234–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni, M., Palmi, P., & Salvemini, S. (2018). Under pressure! Team innovative climate and individual attitudes in shaping individual improvisation. European Management Journal, 36(4), 474–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGorry, S. Y. (2000). Measurement in a cross-cultural environment: survey translation issues. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(2), 74–81.
   Google Scholar
• Moldogaziev, T. T., & Resh, W. G. (2016). A systems theory approach to innovation implementation: Why organizational location matters. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 677–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity research journal, 15(2-3), 107–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A., Herman, H. M., Schwarz, G., & Nielsen, I. (2018). The effects of employees’ creative self-efficacy on innovative behaviour: The role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of Business Research, 89, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, T. W., & Lucianetti, L. (2016). Within-individual increases in innovative behaviour and creative, persuasion, and change self-efficacy over time: A social–cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2017). Digital transformation of public service delivery. Government at a glance. https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2017-72-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2022). OECD recommendation on digital government strategies. https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/recommendation-on-digital-government-strategies.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Jo, S. J. (2018). The impact of proactivity, leader-member exchange, and climate for innovation on innovative behaviour in the Korean government sector. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(1), 130–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of management, 36(4), 827–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piening, E. P. (2011). Insights into the process dynamics of innovation implementation: the case of public hospitals in Germany. Public Management Review, 13(1), 127–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plimmer, G., Berman, E. M., Malinen, S., Franken, E., Naswall, K., Kuntz, J., & Löfgren, K. (2022). Resilience in public sector managers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(2), 338–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puente-Díaz, R. (2016). Creative self-efficacy: An exploration of its antecedents, consequences, and applied implications. Journal of Psychology, 150(2), 175–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, R., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2015). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of leader creativity expectations. Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 286–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, A. W., Hirst, G., van Knippenberg, D., & Baer, M. (2012). Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: cross-level interactions with team informational resources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1282–1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behaviour: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behaviour. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 100, 67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiq, F., Gochyyev, P., & Wilson, M. (2017). Learning in Digital Networks–ICT literacy: A novel assessment of students’ 21st century skills. Computers and Education, 109, 11–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavec, A., & Drnovšek, M. (2012). A perspective on scale development in entrepreneurship research. Economic and Business Review, 14, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.
   Google Scholar
• Stritch, J. M. (2017). Minding the time: A critical look at longitudinal design and data analysis in quantitative public management research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 219–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suseno, Y., Standing, C., Gengatharen, D., & Nguyen, D. (2020). Innovative work behaviour in the public sector: The roles of task characteristics, social support, and proactivity. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(1), 41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasa, K., Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. H. (2007). The development of collective efficacy in teams: a multilevel and longitudinal perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30(3), 413–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., & Mergel, I. (2022). Overcoming barriers to digital government: mapping the strategies of digital champions. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar