692
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

New dependency model and biological analogy for integrating product design for variety with market requirements

&
Pages 722-745 | Received 23 Nov 2011, Accepted 03 Jul 2012, Published online: 07 Aug 2012

References

  • AlGeddawy , T. and ElMaraghy , H. 2010 . Co-evolution hypotheses and model for manufacturing planning . CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology , 59 ( 1 ) : 445 – 448 .
  • AlGeddawy , T. and ElMaraghy , H. 2011 . Design of single assembly line for the delayed differentiation of product variants . Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal , 22 ( 3 ) : 163 – 182 .
  • Browning , T. R. 2001 . Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 48 ( 3 ) : 292 – 306 .
  • Chen , S. L. , Jiao , R. J. and Tseng , M. M. 2009 . Evolutionary product line design balancing customer needs and product commonality . CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology , 58 ( 1 ) : 123 – 126 .
  • Chiriac , N. 2011 . Level of modularity and different levels of system granularity . Journal of Mechanical Design , 133 ( 10 ) 101007 (10 pp.)
  • De Fazio , T. L. and Whitney , D. E. 1987 . Simplified generation of all mechanical assembly sequences . IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation , 3 ( 6 ) : 640 – 658 .
  • ElMaraghy , H. 2009 . “ Changing and evolving products and systems – models and enablers ” . In Changeable and reconfigurable manufacturing systems , Edited by: ElMaraghy , H. 25 – 45 . London : Springer-Verlag .
  • ElMaraghy , H. , AlGeddawy , T. and Azab , A. 2008 . Modelling evolution in manufacturing: a biological analogy . CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology , 57 ( 1 ) : 467 – 472 .
  • Gershenson , J. K. , Prasad , G. J. and Allamneni , S. 1999 . Modular product design: a life-cycle view . Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science , 3 ( 4 ) : 13 – 26 .
  • Hennig , W. 1966 . Phylogenitic systematics , Urbana : University of Illinois Press . republished in 1999
  • Hölttä-Otto , K. and de Weck , O. 2007 . Degree of modularity in engineering systems and products with technical and business constraints . Concurrent Engineering , 15 ( 2 ) : 113 – 126 .
  • Jose , A. and Tollenaere , M. 2005 . Modular and platform methods for product family design: literature analysis . Journal of International Manufacturing , 16 ( 3 ) : 371 – 390 .
  • Kitching , I. J. 1998 . Cladisitcs: the theory and practice of parsimony analysis , 2 , Oxford : Oxford University Press, The Systematics Association .
  • Kumar , D. , Wei , C. and Simpson , T. 2009 . A market-driven approach to product family design . International Journal of Production Research , 47 ( 1 ) : 71 – 104 .
  • Kusiak , A. and Chun-Che , H. 1996 . Development of modular products . IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part A , 19 ( 4 ) : 523 – 538 .
  • Laperriere , L. and ElMaraghy , H. A. 1996 . GAPP: a generative assembly process planner . Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 15 ( 4 ) : 282 – 293 .
  • Lee , H. and Billington , C. 1994 . “ Designing products and processes for postponement ” . In Management of design: engineering and management perspectives , Edited by: Dasu , S. and Eastman , C. 105 – 122 . Boston , MA : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
  • Luh , D.-B. , Ko , Y.-T. and Ma , C.-H. 2011 . A structural matrix-based modelling for designing product variety . Journal of Engineering Design , 22 ( 1 ) : 1 – 29 .
  • Martin , M. and Ishii , K. 2002 . Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures . Research in Engineering Design , 13 ( 4 ) : 213 – 235 .
  • Meyer , M. H. and Lehnerd , A. P. 1997 . The power of product platforms: building value and cost leadership , New York : Free Press .
  • Muffatto , M. and Roveda , M. 2000 . Developing product platforms: analysis of the development process . Technovation , 20 ( 11 ) : 617 – 630 .
  • Nanda , J. 2007 . Product family design knowledge representation, aggregation, reuse, and analysis . (AI EDAM) Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing , 21 ( 2 ) : 173 – 192 .
  • Page , R. D.M. 2003 . Tangled trees: phylogeny, cospeciation, and coevolution , Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press .
  • Pandremenos , J. 2009 . Modularity concepts for the automotive industry: a critical review . CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology , 1 ( 3 ) : 148 – 152 .
  • Qin , Y. and Wei , G. 2012 . Product configuration flow from obtaining customer requirement to providing the final customized product . Journal of Software , 7 ( 2 ) : 308 – 315 .
  • Simpson , T. W. 2004 . Product platform design and customization: status and promise . Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM , 18 ( 1 ) : 3 – 20 .
  • Simpson , T. W. , Siddique , Z. and Jiao , J. 2007 . Product platform and product family design: methods and applications , London : Springer .
  • Suh , N. P. 2001 . “ Axiomatic design: advances and applications ” . In The Oxford Series on Advanced Manufacturing , USA : Oxford University Press .
  • Sukhan , L. 1994 . Subassembly identification and evaluation for assembly planning . IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics , 24 ( 3 ) : 493 – 503 .
  • Tianyang , D. 2006 . A hierarchical approach to disassembly sequence planning for mechanical product . International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 30 ( 5–6 ) : 507 – 520 .
  • Tseng , H.-E. , Chang , C.-C. and Li , J.-D. 2008 . Modular design to support green life-cycle engineering . Expert Systems with Applications , 34 ( 4 ) : 2524 – 2537 .
  • Ulrich , K. and Tung , K. 1991 . Fundamentals of product modularity. Issues in Design Manufacturing/Integration . ASME , 39 ( 1 ) : 73 – 79 .
  • Xing , Y. 2007 . Assembly sequence planning of automobile body components based on liaison graph . Assembly Automation , 27 ( 2 ) : 157 – 164 .
  • Xuehong , D. , Jianxin , J. and Tseng , M. M. 2001 . Architecture of product family: fundamentals and methodology . Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications , 9 ( 4 ) : 309 – 325 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.