A technique to assess the changeability of complex engineering systems

References

• Ahmad , N. , Wynn , D. C. and Clarkson , P. J. 2012 . Change Impact on a Product and Its Redesign Process: A Tool for Knowledge Capture and Reuse . Research in Engineering Design , (Online First), doi:10.1007/s00163-012-0139-8.
   Google Scholar
• Albers , A. , Braun , A. , Clarkson , P. J. , Enkler , H.-G. and Wynn , D. C. 2009 . “ Contact and Channel Modelling to Support the Early Design of Technical Systems ” . international conference on engineering design (ICED’09). Stanford, California.
   Google Scholar
• Ariyo , O. O. 2007 . “ Change Propagation in Complex Design: Predicting Detailed Changes Cases with Multi-Levelled Product Models ” . Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge . PhD diss.
   Google Scholar
• Bischof , A. and Blessing , L. 2008 . “ Guidelines for the Development of Flexible Products ” . international design conference (Design’08). Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Blessing , L. T. M. and Chakrabarti , A. 2009 . DRM – A Design Research Methodology , Berlin : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Browning , T. R. 2001 . Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions . IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 48 ( 3 ) : 292 – 306 . (doi:10.1109/17.946528)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli , L. L. 1994 . Designing Engineers , Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Cardin , M.-A. , Kolfschoten , G. L. , Frey , D. D. , de Neufville , R. , de Weck , O. L. and Geltner , D. M. 2012 . Empirical Evaluation of Procedures to Generate Flexibility in Engineering Systems and Improve Lifecycle Performance . Research in Engineering Design , (Online First), doi:10.1007/s00163-012-0145-x.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson , P. J. , Simons , C. and Eckert , C. M. 2004 . Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design . Journal of Mechanical Design , 126 ( 5 ) : 765 – 797 . (doi:10.1115/1.1765117)
   Google Scholar
• Cohen , T. , Navathe , S. B. and Fulton , R. E. 2000 . C-FAR, Change Favourable Representation . Computer-Aided Design , 32 ( 5 ) : 321 – 338 . (doi:10.1016/S0010-4485(00)00015-4)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross , N. 1989 . Engineering Design Methods , Chichester : John Wiley and Sons .
   Google Scholar
• de Neufville , R. and Scholtes , S. 2011 . Flexibility in Engineering Design , Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Eckert , C. M. , Clarkson , P. J. and Zanker , W. 2004 . Change and Customisation in Complex Engineering Domains . Research in Engineering Design , 15 ( 1 ) : 1 – 21 . (doi:10.1007/s00163-003-0031-7)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eger , T. 2005 . “ Design Freeze During Product Development: Supporting Change Prediction During Detail Design ” . Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge . PhD diss.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke , E. and Schulz , A. P. 2005 . Design for Changeability (DFC): Principles to Enable Changes in Systems Throughout Their Entire Lifecycle . Systems Engineering , 8 ( 4 ) : 342 – 359 . (doi:10.1002/sys.20039)
   Google Scholar
• Giffin , M. , de Weck , O. L. , Bounova , G. , Keller , R. , Eckert , C. M. and Clarkson , P. J. 2009 . Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems . Journal of Mechanical Design , 131 ( 8 ) : 0810011 – 14 . (doi:10.1115/1.3149847)
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao , S. W. and Liu , E. 2005 . A Structural Component-Based Approach for Designing Product Family . Computers in Industry , 56 : 13 – 38 . (doi:10.1016/j.compind.2004.10.002)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarratt , T. A. W. , Eckert , C. M. , Caldwell , N. H. M. and Clarkson , P. J. 2011 . Engineering Change: An Overview and Perspective on the Literature . Research in Engineering Design , 22 ( 2 ) : 103 – 124 . (doi:10.1007/s00163-010-0097-y)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao , J. and Tseng , M. M. 2000 . Understanding Product Family for Mass Customisation by Developing Commonality Indices . Journal of Engineering Design , 11 ( 3 ) : 225 – 243 . (doi:10.1080/095448200750021003)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalligeros , K. , de Weck , O. , de Neufville , R. and Luckins , A. Platform Identification Using Design Structure Matrices . Sixteenth annual international symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE). Orlando , Florida
   Google Scholar
• Keller , R. 2007 . “ Predicting Change Propagation: Algorithms, Representations, Software Tools ” . Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge . PhD diss.
   Google Scholar
• Koh , E. C. Y. 2010 . “ Managing Change Propagation in the Development of Complex Products ” . Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge . PhD diss.
   Google Scholar
• Koh , E. C. Y. , Keller , R. , Eckert , C. M. and Clarkson , P. J. Component Classification: A Change Perspective . 9th international design structure matrix conference (DSM’07). Munich , Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Koh , E. C. Y. , Keller , R. , Eckert , C. M. and Clarkson , P. J. Assessing Design Strategies from a Change Propagation Perspective . 10th international design structure matrix conference (DSM’08). Stockholm , Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Koh , E. C. Y. , Caldwell , N. H. M. and Clarkson , P. J. 2012 . A Method to Assess the Effects of Engineering Change Propagation . Research in Engineering Design , 23 ( 4 ) : 329 – 351 . doi:10.1007/s00163-012-0131-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler , C. , Conrad , J. , Wanke , S. and Weber , C. A Matrix Representation of the CPM/PDD Approach as a Means for Change Impact Analysis . International design conference (Design’08). Dubrovnik , Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Luh , D.-B. , Ko , Y.-T. and Ma , C.-H. 2011 . A Structural Matrix-Based Modelling for Designing Product Variety . Journal of Engineering Design , 22 ( 1 ) : 1 – 29 . (doi:10.1080/09544820902877591)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma , Y. , Chen , G. and Thimm , G. 2008 . Change Propagation Algorithm in a Unified Feature Modelling Scheme . Computers in Industry , 59 ( 2–3 ) : 110 – 118 . (doi:10.1016/j.compind.2007.06.006)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin , M. V. and Ishii , K. 2002 . Design for Variety: Developing Standardized and Modularized Product Platform Architectures . Research in Engineering Design , 13 ( 4 ) : 213 – 235 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer , M. S. 2007 . “ Structural Awareness in Complex Product Design ” . Institute of Product Development, Technical University of Munich . PhD diss.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams , D. A. , Stone , R. B. and Wood , K. L. 1999 . Functional Interdependence and Product Similarity Based on Customer Needs . Research in Engineering Design , 11 ( 1 ) : 1 – 19 . (doi:10.1007/s001630050001)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon , C. A. 1994 . Observations on Modes of Incremental Change in Design . Journal of Engineering Design , 5 ( 3 ) : 195 – 209 . (doi:10.1080/09544829408907883)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer , M. and Lehnerd , A. 1997 . The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership , New York : Free Press .
   Google Scholar
• Morkos , B. , Shankar , P. and Summers , J. D. 2012 . Predicting Requirement Change Propagation, Using Higher Order Design Structure Matrices: An Industry Case Study . Journal of Engineering Design , 23 ( 12 ) : 905 – 926 . doi:10.1080/09544828.2012.662273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda , J. , Simpson , T. , Shooter , S. and Stone , R. A Unified Information Model for Product Family Design Management . ASME international design engineering technical conference (IDETC/CIE’05). Long Beach , California.
   Google Scholar
• Oh , S. , Park , B. , Park , S. and Hong , Y. S. 2007 . “ Design of Change-Absorbing System Architecture for the Design of Robust Products and Services ” . Beijing , , China Human-computer interaction international (HCII 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ollinger , G. A. and Stahovich , T. F. 2004 . Redesign IT- A Model-Based Tool for Managing Design Changes . Journal of Mechanical Design , 126 ( 2 ) : 208 – 216 . (doi:10.1115/1.1666888)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl , G. , Beitz , W. , Feldhusen , J. and Grote , K. H. 2007 . Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , Berlin : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Palani Rajan , P. K. , Van Wie , M. , Campbell , M. I. , Wood , K. L. and Otto , K. N. 2005 . An Empirical Foundation for Product Flexibility . Design Studies , 26 ( 4 ) : 405 – 438 . (doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.007)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasqual , M. C. and de Weck. , O. 2012 . Multilayer Network Model for Analysis and Management of Change Propagation . Research in Engineering Design , 23 ( 4 ) : 305 – 328 . doi:10.1007/s00163-011-0125-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson , D. and Ulrich , K. 1998 . Planning for Product Platforms . Sloan Management Review , 39 ( 4 ) : 19 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Ross , A. M. , Rhodes , D. H. and Hastings , D. E. 2008 . Defining Changeability: Reconciling Flexibility, Adaptability, Scalability, Modifiability, and Robustness for Maintaining System Lifecycle Value . Systems Engineering , 11 ( 3 ) : 246 – 262 . (doi:10.1002/sys.20098)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouibah , K. and Caskey , K. R. 2003 . Change Management in Concurrent Engineering from A Parameter Perspective . Computers in Industry , 50 ( 1 ) : 15 – 34 . (doi:10.1016/S0166-3615(02)00138-0)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutka , A. , Guenov , M. D. , Lemmens , Y. , Schmidt-Schaffer , T. , Coleman , P. and Riviere , A. 2006 . “ Methods for Engineering Change Propagation Analysis ” . Hamburg , , Germany 25th congress of the international council of the aeronautical sciences (ICAS 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Saleh , J. H. , Mark , G. and Jordan , N. C. 2009 . Flexibility: A Multi-Disciplinary Literature Review and a Research Agenda for Designing Flexible Engineering Systems . Journal of Engineering Design , 20 ( 3 ) : 307 – 323 . (doi:10.1080/09544820701870813)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salhieh , S. M. and Kamrani , A. K. 1999 . Macro Level Product Development Using Design for Modularity . Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing , 15 ( 4 ) : 319 – 329 . (doi:10.1016/S0736-5845(99)00008-3)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson , S. and Uzumeri , M. 1995 . Managing Product Families: The Case of the Sony Walkman . Research Policy , 24 ( 5 ) : 761 – 782 . (doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)00797-B)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar , P. , Morkos , B. and Summers , J. D. 2012 . Reasons for Change Propagation: A Case Study in an Automotive OEM . Research in Engineering Design , 23 ( 4 ) : 291 – 303 . doi:10.1007/s00163-012-0132-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddique , Z. and Rosen , D. W. 2001 . On Combinatorial Design Spaces for the Configuration Design of Product Families . Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing , 15 ( 2 ) : 91 – 108 . (doi:10.1017/S0890060401152029)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson , T. W. and D'Souza , B. S. 2004 . Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm . Concurrent Engineering , 12 ( 2 ) : 119 – 129 . (doi:10.1177/1063293X04044383)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson , T. W. , Marion , T. , de Weck , O. , Holtta-Otto , K. , Kokkolaras , M. and Shooter , S. B. Platform-Based Design and Development: Current Trends and Needs in Industry . ASME international design engineering technical conference (IDETC/CIE’06). Philadelphia , Pennsylvania
   Google Scholar
• Sosa , M. E. , Eppinger , S. D. and Rowles , C. M. 2007 . A Network Approach to Define Modularity of Components in Complex Products . Journal of Mechanical Design , 129 ( 11 ) : 1118 – 1129 . (doi:10.1115/1.2771182)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone , R. B. , Wood , K. L. and Crawford , R. H. 2000 . A Heuristic Method for Identifying Modules for Product Architectures . Design Studies , 21 ( 1 ) : 5 – 31 . (doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00003-4)
   Google Scholar
• Suh , E. S. , de Weck , O. L. and Chang , D. 2007 . Flexible Product Platform: Framework and Case Study . Research in Engineering Design , 18 ( 2 ) : 67 – 89 . (doi:10.1007/s00163-007-0032-z)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teegavarapu , S. , Summers , J. D. and Mocko , G. M. Case Study Method for Design Research: A Justification . ASME international design engineering technical conference (IDETC/CIE’08). Brooklyn, New York .
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich , K. T. and Eppinger , S. D. 2000 . Product Design and Development , New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Yassine , A. A. and Falkenburg , D. R. 1999 . A Framework for Design Process Specifications Management . Journal of Engineering Design , 10 ( 3 ) : 223 – 234 . (doi:10.1080/095448299261290)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar