Industrial evaluation of FBS Linkage – a method to support engineering change management

References

• AIAG. 2012. Standardized Engineering Change Management Process Significantly Reduces Cost and Inefficiency. AIAG Homepage. Accessed February 17, 2015, http://www.aiag.org/staticcontent/files/Success-Stories/Engineering-Change-Management.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Albers, A., A. Braun, E. Sadowski, D. C. Wynn, D. F. Wyatt, and P. J. Clarkson. 2011. “System Architecture Modeling in a Software Tool Based on the Contact and Channel Approach (C&C-A).” Journal of Mechanical Design 133 (10), article id 101006 (8 pp.). doi:10.1115/1.4004971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasegaran, S. K., K. Ramani, R. D. Sriram, I. Horváth, A. Bernard, R. F. Harik, and W. Gao. 2013. “The Evolution, Challenges, and Future of Knowledge Representation in Product Design Systems.” CAD Computer Aided Design 45 (2): 204–228. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2012.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., A. Macwan, and S. Li. 2007. “Model-based Rapid Redesign Using Decomposition Patterns.” Journal of Mechanical Design 129 (3): 283–294. doi: 10.1115/1.2406099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. M., W. S. Shir, and C. Y. Shen. 2002. “Distributed Engineering Change Management for Allied Concurrent Engineering.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 15 (2): 127–151. doi: 10.1080/09511920110047181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, K. B., and T. Fujimoto. 1991. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P. J., C. Simons, and C. M. Eckert. 2004. “Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design.” Journal of Mechanical Design 126 (5): 788–797. doi: 10.1115/1.1765117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., S. B. Navathe, and R. E. Fulton. 2000. “C-far, Change Favorable Representation.” CAD Computer Aided Design 32 (5): 321–338. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4485(00)00015-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, C., T. Alink, A. Ruckpaul, and A. Albers. 2011. “Different Notions of Function: Results From an Experiment on the Analysis of an Existing Product.” Journal of Engineering Design 22 (11–12): 811–837. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2011.603297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, C. M., P. J. Clarkson, and W. Zanker. 2004. “Change and Customisation in Complex Engineering Domains.” Research in Engineering Design 15 (1): 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s00163-003-0031-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Far, B. H., and A. H. Elamy. 2005. “Functional Reasoning Theories: Problems and Perspectives.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (AIEDAM) 19 (2): 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke, E., B. Gebhard, H. Negele, and E. Igenbergs. 2000. “Coping with Changes: Causes, Findings, and Strategies.” Systems Engineering 3 (4): 169–179. doi: 10.1002/1520-6858(2000)3:4<169::AID-SYS1>3.0.CO;2-W
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, E., and A. P. Schulz. 2005. “Design for Changeability (dfc): Principles to Enable Changes in Systems throughout Their Entire Lifecycle.” Systems Engineering 8 (4): 342–359. doi: 10.1002/sys.20039
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. 1990. “Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design.” AI Magazine 11 (4): 26–36. doi: 10.1109/62.63160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, A. K., S. Rugaber, and S. Vattam. 2009. “Structure, Behavior, and Function of Complex Systems: The Structure, Behavior, and Function Modeling Language.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (AIEDAM) 23 (1): 23–35. doi: 10.1017/S0890060409000080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, A. K., and E. Stroulia. 1996. “Functional Device Models and Model-Based Diagnosis in Adaptive Design.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (AIEDAM) 10 (4): 355–370. doi: 10.1017/S0890060400001670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamraz, B., N. H. M. Caldwell, and P. J. Clarkson. 2013a. “A Holistic Categorisation Framework for Literature on Engineering Change Management.” Systems Engineering 16 (4): 473–505. doi: 10.1002/sys.21244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamraz, B., N. H. M. Caldwell, and P. John Clarkson. 2012. “A Multidomain Engineering Change Propagation Model to Support Uncertainty Reduction and Risk Management in Design.” Journal of Mechanical Design 134 (10): 100905.01–14. doi: 10.1115/1.4007397
   Google Scholar
• Hamraz, B., N. H. M. Caldwell, D. C. Wynn, and P. J. Clarkson. 2013b. “Requirements-based Development of an Improved Engineering Change Management Method.” Journal of Engineering Design 24 (11): 765–793. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2013.834039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamraz, B., O. Hisarciklilar, K. Rahmani, D. C. Wynn, V. Thomson, and P. J. Clarkson. 2013c. “Change Prediction Using Interface Data.” Concurrent Engineering 21 (2): 139–154. doi: 10.1177/1063293X13482473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, B., and K. Shea. 2012. “Computational Synthesis of Product Architectures Based on Object-Oriented Graph Grammars.” Journal of Mechanical Design 134 (2), 021008 (14 p). doi:10.1115/1.4005592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, B., K. Shea, and F. Hoisl, 2009. “A Framework for Computational Design Synthesis Based on Graph-Grammars and Function-Behavior-Structure.” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC'09), San Diego, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hirtz, J., R. B. Stone, D. A. Mcadams, S. Szykman, and K. L. Wood. 2002. “A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts.” Research in Engineering Design 13 (2): 65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, G. Q., and K. L. Mak. 1999. “Current Practices of Engineering Change Management in UK Manufacturing Industries.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 19 (1): 21–37. doi: 10.1108/01443579910244205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janthong, N. 2011. “A Methodology for Tracking the Impact of Changes in (Re)designing of the Industrial Complex Product.” IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM'11), Singapore, December 6–9, 1058–1062.
   Google Scholar
• Jarratt, T. a. W., C. M. Eckert, N. H. M. Caldwell, and P. J. Clarkson. 2011. “Engineering Change: An Overview and Perspective on the Literature.” Research in Engineering Design 22 (2): 103–124. doi: 10.1007/s00163-010-0097-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarratt, T. a. W., C. M. Eckert, and P. J. Clarkson. 2004. “Development of a Product Model to Support Engineering Change Management.” Fifth International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering (TMCE'04). Lausanne, Switzerland, April 13–17, 331–342.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R. 2007. “Predicting Change Propagation: Algorithms, Representations, Software Tools.” PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R., C. M. Eckert, and P. J. Clarkson. 2009. “Using an Engineering Change Methodology to Support Conceptual Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 20 (6): 571–587. doi: 10.1080/09544820802086988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocar, V., and A. Akgunduz. 2010. “Advice: A Virtual Environment for Engineering Change Management.” Computers in Industry 61 (1): 15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2009.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loch, C. H., and C. Terwiesch. 1999. “Accelerating the Process of Engineering Change Orders: Capacity and Congestion Effects.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (2): 145–159. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00042-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., G. Chen, and G. Thimm. 2008. “Change Propagation Algorithm in a Unified Feature Modeling Scheme.” Computers in Industry 59 (2–3): 110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2007.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, A. M., and S. Langer. 2011. Engineering Change Management Report 2011: Survey Results on Causes and Effects, Current Practice, Problems, and Strategies in Denmark. Copenhagen: Technical University of Denmark, Department of Management Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Ollinger, G. A., and T. F. Stahovich. 2004. “Redesignit – A Model-Based Tool for Managing Design Changes.” Journal of Mechanical Design 126 (2): 208–216. doi: 10.1115/1.1666888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasqual, M., and O. L. De Weck. 2012. “Multilayer Network Model for Analysis and Management of Change Propagation.” Research in Engineering Design 23 (4): 305–328. doi: 10.1007/s00163-011-0125-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, B. 1997. Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals: Integrated Product Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, L., and J. S. Gero. 1996. “Functions-Behavior-Structure Paths and Their Role in Analogy-Based Design.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (AIEDAM) 10 (4): 289–312. doi: 10.1017/S0890060400001633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmani, K., and V. Thomson. 2011. “Managing Subsystem Interfaces of Complex Products.” International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management 5 (1): 73–83. doi: 10.1504/IJPLM.2011.038103
   Google Scholar
• Rouibah, K., and K. R. Caskey. 2003. “Change Management in Concurrent Engineering from a Parameter Perspective.” Computers in Industry 50 (1): 15–34. doi: 10.1016/S0166-3615(02)00138-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, C. S. 2000. “Change Propagation in Product Design: A Change Prediction Method.” MPhil, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C., and C. H. Loch. 1999. “Managing the Process of Engineering Change Orders: The Case of the Climate Control System in Automobile Development.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (2): 160–172. doi: 10.1016/S0737-6782(98)00041-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umeda, Y., M. Ishii, M. Yoshioka, Y. Shimomura, and T. Tomiyama. 1996. “Supporting Conceptual Design Based on the Functions-Behavior-State Modeler.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (AIEDAM) 10 (4): 275–288. doi: 10.1017/S0890060400001621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umeda, Y., S. Kondoh, Y. Shimomura, and T. Tomiyama. 2005. “Development of Design Methodology for Upgradable Products Based on Functions-Behavior-State Modeling.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (AIEDAM) 19 (3): 161–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umeda, Y., H. Takeda, T. Tomiyama, and H. Yoshikawa. 1990. “Function, Behaviour, and Structure.” In Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, edited by J. S. Gero, 177–193. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Beek, T. J., M. S. Erden, and T. Tomiyama. 2010. “Modular Design of Mechatronic Systems with Function Modeling.” Mechatronics 20 (8): 850–863. doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Beek, T. J., and T. Tomiyama. 2012. “Structured Workflow Approach to Support Evolvability.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 26 (3): 487–501. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, I. C. 1997. “A Review of Research into Engineering Change Management: Implications for Product Design.” Design Studies 18 (1): 33–39. doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00029-4
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, D. C., D. F. Wyatt, S. M. T. Nair, and P. J. Clarkson. 2010. “An Introduction to the Cambridge Advanced Modeller.” 1st International Conference on Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes (MMEP'10), Cambridge, July 19–20.
   Google Scholar