Relational reasoning as predictor for engineering ideation success using TRIZ

References

• Ahmed, S., and B. T. Christensen. 2009. “An in Situ Study of Analogical Reasoning in Novice and Experienced Design Engineers.” Journal of Mechanical Design 131 (11), article id 111104 (9 pp.). doi:10.1115/1.3184693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., D. Dumas, E. M. Grossnickle, A. List, and C. M. Firetto. 2015. “Measuring Relational Reasoning.” The Journal of Experimental Education 83: 1–33. doi:10.1080/00220973.2014.963216.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuller, G., and L. Shulyak. 2002. 40 Principles: TRIZ Keys to Technical Innovation. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Basadur, M., and R. Thompson. 1986. “Usefulness of the Ideation Principle of Extended Effort in Real World Professional and Managerial Creative Problem Solving.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 20 (1): 23–34. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00414.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellocchi, A., and S. M. Ritchie. 2011. “Investigating and Theorizing Discourse During Analogy Writing in Chemistry.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (7): 771–792. 10.1002/tea.20428. doi: 10.1002/tea.20428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdi, K., D. Leach, and M. Wissam. 2012. “Evaluating the Impact of TRIZ Creativity Training: An Organizational Field Study.” R&D Management 42 (4): 315–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge, S. A., C. Wendelken, D. Badre, and A. D. Wagner. 2005. “Analogical Reasoning and Prefrontal Cortex: Evidence for Separable Retrieval and Integration Mechanisms.” Cerebral Cortex 15 (3): 239–249. 10.1093/cercor/bhh126. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charyton, C. 2014. Creative Engineering Design Assessment: Background, Directions, Manual, Scoring Guide and Uses. New York: Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, D., P. A. Alexander, and E. M. Grossnickle. 2013. “Relational Reasoning and its Manifestations in the Educational Context: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Educational Psychology Review 25: 391–427. doi: 10.1007/s10648-013-9224-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, K., J. Chan, J. Cagan, K. Kotovsky, C. Schunn, and K. Wood. 2013. “The Meaning of “Near” and “Far”: The Impact of Structuring Design Databases and the Effect of Distance of Analogy on Design Output.” Journal of Mechanical Design 135: 021007-1-12. 10.1115/1.4023158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. 1983. “Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy.” Cognitive Science 7: 155–170. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, W. 1961. Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity. New York: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. 1992. Analogical Reasoning in Children. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. 1950. “Creativity.” American Psychologist 5: 444–454. doi: 10.1037/h0063487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J. 2012. “Analogy and Relational Reasoning.” In The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, edited by K. J. Holyoak and R. G. Morrison, 234–260. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., S. J. Culley, and E. Dekoninck. 2008. “Describing the Creative Design Process by the Integration of Engineering Design and Cognitive Psychology Literature.” Design Studies 29 (2): 160–180. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, L. 1968. Frames of Mind: Ability, Perception and Self-Perception in the Arts and Sciences. Oxford: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, C., and K. Kim. 2014. “Creating Patents on the New Technology using Analogy-Based Patent Mining.” Expert Systems with Applications 41 (8): 3605–3614. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.11.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal, B., D. Leach, and M. Wissam. 2012. “Evaluating the Impact of TRIZ Creativity Training: An Organizational Field Study.” R&D Management, 42 (4): 315–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, N. W., P. B. Paulus, and Y. Choi. 2011. “Building on the Ideas of Others: An Examination of the Idea Combination Process.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47 (3): 554–561. 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.004. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawczyk, D. C. 2012. “The Cognition and Neuroscience of Relational Reasoning.” Brain Research 1428: 13–23. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.080. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León-Rovira, N., Y. Heredia-Escorza, and L. M. L.-D. Río. 2008. “Systematic Creativity, Challenge-Based Instruction and Active Learning: A Study of Its Impact on Freshman Engineering Students.” International Journal of Engineering Education 24: 1051–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsey, J. S., A. B. Markman, and K. L. Wood. 2012. “Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem re-Representation.” Journal of Mechanical Design 134: 041009-1–12. 10.1115/1.4006145. doi: 10.1115/1.4006145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsey, J. S., K. L. Wood, and A. B. Markman. 2008. “Modality and Representation in Analogy.” AIEDAM 22 (2): 85–100. doi: 10.1017/S0890060408000061
   Google Scholar
• Logie, R. H. 2003. “Spatial and Visual Working Memory: A Mental Workspace.” In Cognitive Vision: The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, edited by D. E. Irwin and B. H. Ross, Vol. 42, 37–78. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorch, R. F., and J. L. Myers. 1990. “Regression Analyses of Repeated Measures Data in Cognitive Research.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 (1): 149–157. 10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okudan, G. E., M. Ogot, and R. Shirwaiker. 2006. “An Investigation on the Effectiveness of Design Ideation using TRIZ.” Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2006 Design Education Conference, Philadelphia, PA, September 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Orloff, M. A. 2006. Inventive Thinking Through TRIZ: A Practical Guide. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ramde, D. 2009. Energy-Efficient Traffic Lights Can't Melt Snow. Associated Press. Accessed February 26, 2014. http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2009/Dec/15/energy-efficient-traffic-lights-cant-melt-snow/http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2009/Dec/15/energy-efficient-traffic-lights-cant-melt-snow/.
   Google Scholar
• Rantanen, K., and E. Domb. 2002. Simplified TRIZ: New Problem Solving Applications for Engineers & Manufacturing Professionals. St. Lucie: Times Mirror, London.
   Google Scholar
• Richland, L. E., and I. M. McDonough. 2010. “Learning by Analogy: Discriminating Between Potential Analogs.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 35 (1): 28–43. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.09.001. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, J., U. Pal, and A. Chakrabarti. 2010. “A Methodology for Supporting “Transfer” in Biomimetic Design.” AIEDAM 24: 483–506. doi: 10.1017/S0890060410000351
   Google Scholar
• Shah, J. J., S. M. Smith, and N. Vargas Hernandez. 2003. “Metrics for Measuring Ideation Effectiveness.” Design Studies 24 (2): 111–134. doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0
   Google Scholar
• Sprenger, A. M., S. M. Atkins, D. J. Bolger, J. I. Harbison, J. M. Novick, J. S. Chrabaszcz, and M. R. Dougherty. 2013. “Training Working Memory: Limits of Transfer.” Intelligence 41 (5): 638–663. 10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.013. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. 1998. Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Trey, L., and S. Khan. 2008. “How Science Students Can Learn about Unobservable Phenomena Using Computer-Based Analogies.” Computers & Education 51 (2): 519–529. 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.019. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trickett, S. B., J. G. Trafton, and C. D. Schunn. 2009. “How Do Scientists Respond to Anomalies? Different Strategies Used in Basic and Applied Science.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1: 711–729. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01036.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01036.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D., and A. Shamir. 2010. “Mediation Strategies and Cognitive Modifiability in Young Children as a Function of Peer Mediation with Young Children Program and Training in Analogies Versus Math Tasks.” Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 9 (1): 4872. 10.1891/1945-8959.9.1.48.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas Hernandez, N., L. C. Schmidt, and G. E. Okudan. 2013. “Systematic Ideation Effectiveness Study of TRIZ.” Journal of Mechanical Design 135 (10): 101009. 10.1115/1.4024976. doi: 10.1115/1.4024976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas Hernandez, N., L. Schmidt, G. Okudan, and J. Linsey. 2010. “Systematic Ideation Curriculum Effectiveness Investigation & Deployment to Enhance Design Learning.” Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, August 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Vattam, S. S., M. E. Helms, and A. K. Goel. 2010. “A Content Account of Creative Analogies in Biologically Inspired Design.” AIEDAM 24: 467–481. doi: 10.1017/S089006041000034X
   Google Scholar
• Visser, W. 2009. “Design: One, but in Different Forms.” Design Studies 30: 187–223. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C. S., and E. J. Caropreso. 1989. “Training in Analogical Reasoning Processes: Effects on low Socioeconomic Status Preschool Children.” The Journal of Educational Research 83 (2): 112–118. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1989.10885939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar