A product functional modelling approach based on the energy flow by using characteristics-properties modelling

References

• Altshuller, G. 1984. Creativity as an Exact Science. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuller, G. 1999. The Innovation Algorithm. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuller, G. 2008. And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared – TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. 8th ed. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blessing, L. T. M., and A. Chakrabarti. 2009. DRM, a Design Research Methodology. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borutzky, W. 2010. Bond Graph Methodology: Development and Analysis of Multidisciplinary Dynamic System Models. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, T. R. 2001. “Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48 (3): 292–306. doi: 10.1109/17.946528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casoli, P., A. Vacca, and G. L. Berta. 2008. “Optimization of Relevant Design Parameters of External Gear Pumps.” Paper presented at the 7th JFPS international symposium on fluid power, Toyama.
   Google Scholar
• Casoli, P., A. Vacca, and G. Franzoni. 2005. “A Numerical Model for the Simulation of External Gear Pumps.” Paper presented at the 6th JFPS international symposium on fluid power, Tsukuba, 705–710.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, J., T. Deubel, C. Köhler, S. Wanke, and C. Weber. 2007. “Change Impact and Risk Analysis (CIRA) – Combining the CPM/PDD Theory and FMEA-Methodology for an Improved Engineering Change Management.” Paper presented at the international conference on engineering design, ICED’07, August 28–31, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, J., C. Köhler, S. Wanke, and C. Weber. 2008. “What Is Design Knowledge From the Viewpoint of CPM/PDD?” Paper presented at the international design conference – Design 2008, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 745–752.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2000. Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dantan, J.-Y., A. J. Qureshi, J. F. Antoine, B. Eisenbart, and L. T. M. Blessing. 2013. “Management of Product Characteristics Uncertainty Based on Formal Logic and Characteristics Properties Model.” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 62 (1): 147–150. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbe, T., K. Paetzold, and C. Weber. 2011. “Actuation Principle Selection – An Example for Trade-Off Assessment by CPM-Approach.” Paper presented at the 18th international conference on engineering design (ICED 11), vol. 4, Copenhagen, Denmark, 222–229.
   Google Scholar
• Friedenthal, S., A. Moore, and R. Steiner. 2012. A Practical Guide to SysML. 2nd ed. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. 1990. “Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design.” AI Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., and U. Kannengiesser. 2004. “The Situated Function-Behaviour-Structure Framework.” Design Studies 25 (4): 373–391. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., and T. Mc Neill. 1998. “An Approach to the Analysis of Design Protocols.” Design Studies 19 (1): 21–61. doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00015-X
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, H., and R. Lossack. 2000. “The Axiomatic Approach in the Universal Design Theory.” Paper presented at the proceedings of the first international conference on axiomatic design, Cambridge, MA, 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Grabowski, H., S. Rude, G. Grein, E. Meis, and E. El-Mejbir. 1998. “Universal Design Theory: Elements and Applicability to Computers.” In Universal Design Theory, edited by H. Grabowski, S. Rude, and G. Grein, 209–220. Aachen: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, P., M. Hashemian, and A. Y. C. Nee. 2004. “Adaptable Design.” Annals of CIRP 53 2: 539–557. doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60028-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M. R., and L. E. Taylor. 1993. “A Meta-Model for Mechanical Products Based upon the Mechanical Design Process.” Research in Engineering Design 5 (3–4): 140–160. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01608360http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01608360. doi: 10.1007/BF01608360
   Google Scholar
• Huang, G. 1996. Design for X: Concurrent Engineering Imperatives. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hubka, V., and W. E. Eder. 1987. “A Scientific Approach to Engineering Design.” Design Studies 8 (3): 123–137. doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(87)90035-4
   Google Scholar
• Hubka, V., and W. E. Eder. 1996. Design Science. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koening, H. E., Y. Tokad, and H. K. Kesavan. 1967. Analysis of Discrete Physical Systems. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, C., J. Conrad, S. Wanke, and C. Weber. 2008. “A Matrix Representation of the CPM/PDD Approach as a Means for Change Impact Analysis.” Paper presented at international design conference – design 2008, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Le Masson, P., K. Dorst, and E. Subrahmanian. 2013. “Design Theory: History, State of the Art and Advancements.” Research in Engineering Design 24 (2): 97–103. Accessed February 4, 2015. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00163-013-0154-4. doi: 10.1007/s00163-013-0154-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liping, C., Z. Yan, Z. Fanli, Z. Jianjun, and T. Xianzhao. 2011. “Modeling and Simulation of Gear Pumps Based on Modelica/MWorks®,” 421–429.
   Google Scholar
• Lutters, E., F. J. A. M. Van Houten, A. Bernard, E. Mermoz, and S. L. Schutte. 2014. “Tools and Techniques for Product Design.” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 63: 607–630. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmiry, R. B., J.-Y. Dantan, J. Pailhès, and J.-F. Antoine. 2016. “From Functions to Tolerance Analysis Models by Using Energy Flow Model in Characteristics-Properties Modelling.” Procedia CIRP 43: 100–105. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212827116002274. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.010
   Google Scholar
• Malmiry, R. B., J. Pailhès, A. J. Qureshi, J.-F. Antoine, and J.-Y. Dantan. 2016. “Management of Product Design Complexity due to Epistemic Uncertainty via Energy Flow Modelling Based on CPM.” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 65 (1): 169–172. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. E., R. J. Mikulak, and M. R. Beauregard. 1996. The Basics of FMEA. New York: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuno, S., and Y. Akao. 1993. QFD: The Customer-Driven Approach to Quality Planning & Deployment. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Mucchi, E., G. Dalpiaz, and A. Fernàndez Del Rincòn. 2015. “Elasto-Dynamic Analysis of a Gear Pump-Part IV: Improvement in the Pressure Distribution Modelling.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 50–51: 193–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucchi, E., A. Rivola, and G. Dalpiaz. 2014. “Modelling Dynamic Behaviour and Noise Generation in Gear Pumps: Procedure and Validation.” Applied Acoustics 77: 99–111. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppelt, W. 1972. Kleines Handbuch Technischer Regelvorgänge. 5th ed. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie.
   Google Scholar
• Osiński, P., A. Deptuła, and M. A. Partyka. 2013. “Discrete Optimization of a Gear Pump after Tooth Root Undercutting by Means of Multi-Valued Logic Trees.” Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 13 (4): 422–431. doi: 10.1016/j.acme.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., W. Beitz, J. Feldhusen, and K.-H. Grote. 2007. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. 3rd ed. edited by K. Wallace and L. T. M. Blessing. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pailhès, J. 2013. “De L’analyse Fonctionelle et Physique À L'aide Decision En Conception.” Univeristé Bordeaux 1.
   Google Scholar
• Pailhès, J., M. Sallaou, and J. P. Nadeau. 2007. “Knowledge Base Formulation for Aided Design Tool.” Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering II 231–243. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6761-7_16.
   Google Scholar
• Pailhès, J., M. Sallaou, J.-P. Nadeau, and G. M. Fadel. 2011. “Energy Based Functional Decomposition in Preliminary Design.” Journal of Mechanical Design 133 (May): 051011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paynter, H. M. 1961. Analysis and Design of Engineering Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pektas, S. T., and M. Pultar. 2006. “Modelling Detailed Information Flows in Building Design with the Parameter-Based Design Structure Matrix.” Design Studies 27: 99–122. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, A. J., B. Eisenbart, J.-Y. Dantan, and L. T. M. Blessing. 2011. “Design Automation with the Characteristics Properties Model and the Property Driven Design for Redesign.” Paper presented at the 23rd CIRP design conference, edited by M. Abramovici and R. Stark. Bochum: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 563–572.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, and S. Tarantola. 2008. Global Sensitivity Analysis – The Primer. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, F. Campolongo, and M. Ratto. 2004. Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Savransky, S. D. 2000. Enginnering of Creativity (Introduction to TRIZ Methodology of Inventive Problem Solving). New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 1990. The Principles of Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 2001. Axiomatic Design – Advances and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sushil, N. 1991. “Simplified Physical System Theory Model of a Closed Chain Production System.” International Journal of Systems Science 22 (6): 987–999. doi: 10.1080/00207729108910676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sushil, N. 2002. “Physical System Theory: Fundamentals, Recent Developments and Relationships with System Dynamics.” Kybernetes 31 (3/4): 496–528. doi: 10.1108/03684920210422584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sushil, N., S. N. Singh, and B. K. Jain. 1988. “A Physical System Theory Approach to Material Flow and Productivity Analysis.” Engineering Costs and Production Economics 13 (3): 207–215. doi: 10.1016/0167-188X(88)90007-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, G. 1987. The System of Experimental Design Engineering Methods to Optimize Quality and Minimize Cost, Vols. 1 and 2. Dearborn, MI: American Supplier Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tichem, M. 1997. A Design Coordination Approach to Design for X. Delft: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomiyama, T. 1997. “A Note on Research Directions of Design Studies.” Paper presented at proceedings of the 11th ICED 1997, Tampere, Finland, 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Tomiyama, T., P. Gu, Y. Jin, D. Lutters, Ch. Kind, and F. Kimura. 2009. “Design Methodologies: Industrial and Educational Applications.” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 58 (2): 543–565. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacca, A., G. Franzoni, and P. Casoli. 2007. “On the Analysis of Experimental Data for External Gear Machines.” Paper presented at ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, IMECE2007, Seattle, Washington, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 2005a. “CPM/PDD – An Extended Theoretical Approach to Modelling Products and Product Development Processes.” Paper presented at proceedings of the 2nd German-Israeli symposium on advances in methods and systems for development of products and processes, 159–179. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer-IRB.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 2005b. “Simulation Models of Machine Elements as Components of Mechatronic Systems.” Paper presented at AEDS 2005 workshop, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 2007. “Looking at ‘DFX’ and ‘Product Maturity’ from the Perspective of a New Approach to Modelling Product and Product Development Processes.” Paper presented at the 17th CIRP design conference: The future of product development, 85–104. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 2008. “How to Derive Application-Specific Design Methodologies.” Paper presented at the 10th international design conference 2008, vol. 1, 69–80, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 2009. “Theory of Technical Systems (TTS) – Existing Approaches and Challenges.” 17th international conference on engineering design, ICED’09, CA, 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C., H. Werner, and T. Deubel. 2003. “A Different View on Product Data Management/Product Life-Cycle Management and Its Future Potentials.” Journal of Engineering Design 14 (4): 447–464. doi: 10.1080/09544820310001606876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar