DRE-based semi-automation of the axiomatic design transformation: from the functional requirement to the design parameter

References

• Akao, Y. 1990. “Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design.” Brain Research 498 (1): 135–139.
   Google Scholar
• Araz, M., and Z. Erden. 2014. “Behavioural Representation and Simulation of Design Concepts for Systematic Conceptual Design of Mechatronic Systems Using Petri Nets.” International Journal of Production Research 52 (2): 563–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bier, I. D., and R. Cornesky. 2001. “Using qfd to Construct a Higher Education Curriculum.” Quality Progress 34 (4): 64–68.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., and Y. Xie. 2017a. “A Computational Approach for the Optimal Conceptual Design Synthesis Based on the Distributed Resource Environment.” International Journal of Production Research 55 (20): 5881–5901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., and Y. Xie. 2017b. “Functional Knowledge Integration of the Design Process.” Science China Technological Sciences 60 (02): 209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Chiou, S. J., and K. Sridhar. 1999. “Automated Conceptual Design of Mechanisms.” Mechanism and Machine Theory 34 (3): 467–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophe, F., A. Bernard, and É Coatanéa. 2010. “RFBS: A Model for Knowledge Representation of Conceptual Design.” CIRP Annals 59 (1): 155–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, W. S. 1998. “HIPO Hierarchy Plus Input-Process-Output.” In The Information System Consultant's Handbook, Systems Analysis and Design, edited by W. S. Davis and D. C. Yen, 503–510. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Deo, H. V., and N. P. Suh. 2004. “Mathematical Transforms in Design: Case Study on Feedback Control of a Customizable Automotive Suspension.” CIRP Annals 53 (1): 125–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erixon, G. 1998. “Modular Function Deployment: A Method for Product Modularisation (pp. 50–57).” Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Manufacturing Systems, Assembly Systems Division.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. 1990. “Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design.” Ai Magazine 11 (4): 26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., and U. Kannengiesser. 2004. “The Situated Function–Behaviour–Structure Framework.” Design Studies 25 (4): 373–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, B., and K. Shea. 2012. “Computational Synthesis of Product Architectures Based on Object-Oriented Graph Grammars.” Journal of Mechanical Design 134 (2): 021008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirtz, J., R. B. Stone, D. A. Mcadams, S. Szykman, and K. L. Wood. 2002. “A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts.” Research in Engineering Design 13 (2): 65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joskowicz, L., and D. Neville. 1996. “A Representation Language for Mechanical Behavior.” Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 10 (2): 109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Kota, S., and S. J. Chiou. 1992. “Conceptual Design of Mechanisms Based on Computational Synthesis and Simulation of Kinematic Building Blocks.” Research in Engineering Design 4 (2): 75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kulak, O., S. Cebi, and C. Kahraman. 2010. “Applications of Axiomatic Design Principles: A Literature Review.” Expert Systems with Applications 37 (9): 6705–6717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtoglu, T., A. Swantner, and M. I. Campbell. 2010. “Automating the Conceptual Design Process: ‘From Black Box to Component Selection’.” AI EDAM 24 (1): 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, M. W., and A. Imsdahl. 2014. “Modular Function Deployment: Using Module Drivers to Impart Strategies to a Product Architecture.” In Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design, 91–118. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and H. Shin. 2008. “Parameter Design of Water Jet Nozzle Utilizing Independence Axiom.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 222 (3): 157–169.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, S., and M. G. Helander. 2007. “Use of Axiomatic Design Principles for Analysing the Complexity of Human-Machine Systems.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 8 (2): 147–169.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, W. E. 2004. “The Interactive Thread: Exploring Methods for Multi-disciplinary Design.” Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, Cambridge, MA, USA, August 1–4 (pp. 103–112). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mao, A., J. Luo, Y. Li, X. Luo, and R. Wang. 2011. “A Multi-Disciplinary Strategy for Computer-Aided Clothing Thermal Engineering Design.” Computer-Aided Design 43 (12): 1854–1869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, L. A., N. Back, and G. H. Oliveira. 2009. “Designing Automated Test Systems: An Adapted Methodology Inspired on Pahl and Beitz’s Systematic Approach.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 25 (6): 945–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münzer, C., B. Helms, and K. Shea. 2013. “Automatically Transforming Object-Oriented Graph-Based Representations into Boolean Satisfiability Problems for Computational Design Synthesis.” Journal of Mechanical Design 135 (10): 101001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., and W. Beitz. 2013. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. J. 2001. “Introduction to ISO 10303 – The Step Standard for Product Data Exchange.” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 1 (1): 102–103.
   Google Scholar
• Stay, J. F. 1976. “Hipo and Integrated Program Design.” IBM Systems Journal 15 (2): 143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, R. B., and K. L. Wood. 2000. “Development of a Functional Basis for Design.” Journal of Mechanical Design 122 (4): 359–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, R. B., K. L. Wood, and R. H. Crawford. 2000. “A Heuristic Method for Identifying Modules for Product Architectures.” Design Studies 21 (1): 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 1995. “Designing-in of Quality Through Axiomatic Design.” IEEE Transactions on Reliability 44 (2): 256–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 1998. “Axiomatic Design Theory for Systems.” Research in Engineering Design 10 (4): 189–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 2001. Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. The Oxford Series on Advanced Manufacturing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thielman, J., and P. Ge. 2006. “Applying Axiomatic Design Theory to the Evaluation and Optimization of Large-Scale Engineering Systems.” Journal of Engineering Design 17 (1): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielman, J., P. Ge, Q. Wu, and L. Parme. 2005. “Evaluation and Optimization of General Atomics’ GT-MHR Reactor Cavity Cooling System Using an Axiomatic Design Approach.” Nuclear Engineering and Design 235 (13): 1389–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, F., and M. Voskuijl. 2015. “Automated Generation of Multiphysics Simulation Models to Support Multidisciplinary Design Optimization.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 29 (4): 1110–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viaene, J., and R. Januszewska. 1999. “Quality Function Deployment in the Chocolate Industry.” Food Quality and Preference 10 (4–5): 377–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, R. V., and J. R. Dixon. 1994. “Guiding Conceptual Design Through Behavioral Reasoning.” Research in Engineering Design 6 (3): 169–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, C. H., J. C. Huang, and C. K. Yu. 2011. “Integration of Four-Phase QFD and TRIZ in Product R&D: A Notebook Case Study.” Research in Engineering Design 22 (3): 125–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, J. W., and G. J. Park. 2005. “Development of a Design System for EPS Cushioning Package of a Monitor Using Axiomatic Design.” Advances in Engineering Software 36 (4): 273–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar