Capturing simulation intent in an ontology: CAD and CAE integration application

References

• Armstrong, Cecil G. 1994. “Modelling Requirements for Finite-Element Analysis.” Computer-Aided Design 26 (7): 573–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Cecil G., Jonathan Roy Corney, Jonathan Charles Salmon, and Stephen Cameron. 2000. Djinn. A Geometric Interface for Solid Modelling. Winchester, UK: Information Geometers.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Cecil G., Harold J. Fogg, Christopher M. Tierney, and Trevor T. Robinson. 2015. “Common Themes in Multi-Block Structured Quad/Hex Mesh Generation.” Procedia Engineering 124: 70–82. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.123.
   Google Scholar
• Arp, Robert, Barry Smith, and Andrew D. Spear. 2015. Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Badin, Julien, Dominique Chamoret, Samuel Gomes, and Davy Monticolo. 2011. “Knowledge Configuration Management for Product Design and Numerical Simulation.” In DS 68-6: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 6: Design Information and Knowledge, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark, August 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Barbau, Raphael, Sylvere Krima, Sudarsan Rachuri, Anantha Narayanan, Xenia Fiorentini, Sebti Foufou, and Ram D. Sriram. 2012. “OntoSTEP: Enriching Product Model Data Using Ontologies.” Computer-Aided Design 44 (6): 575–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidarra, Rafael, Klaas Jan De Kraker, and Willem F Bronsvoort. 1998. “Representation and Management of Feature Information in a Cellular Model.” Computer-Aided Design 30 (4): 301–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidarra, Rafael, Joaquim Madeira, Willem J. Neels, and Willem F. Bronsvoort. 2005. “Efficiency of Boundary Evaluation for a Cellular Model.” Computer-Aided Design 37 (12): 1266–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boussuge, Flavien. 2014. “Idealization of CAD Assemblies for FE Structural Analyses.” Grenoble.
   Google Scholar
• Boussuge, Flavien, Jean-Claude Léon, Stefanie Hahmann, and Lionel Fine. 2012. “An Analysis of DMU Transformation Requirements for Structural Assembly Simulations.” In Int. Conf. ECT2012, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 4–7 September.
   Google Scholar
• Boussuge, Flavien, Jean-Claude Léon, Stefanie Hahmann, and Lionel Fine. 2014a. “Extraction of Generative Processes from B-Rep Shapes and Application to Idealization Transformations.” Computer-Aided Design 46: 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boussuge, Flavien, Ahmad Shahwan, Jean-Claude Léon, Stefanie Hahmann, Gilles Foucault, and Lionel Fine. 2014b. “Template-Based Geometric Transformations of a Functionally Enriched DMU Into FE Assembly Models.” Computer-Aided Design and Applications 11 (4): 436–449.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, Balakrishnan, John R. Josephson, and V. Richard Benjamins. 1999. “What Are Ontologies, and Why Do We Need Them?” IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 14 (1): 20–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Xiaomeng, Rahul Rai, and Janis Terpenny. 2010. “Development and Utilization of Ontologies in Design for Manufacturing.” Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (2): 21009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, C. S., A. Senthil Kumar, and K. H. Lee. 2004. “Automatic Solid Decomposition and Reduction for Non-Manifold Geometric Model Generation.” Computer-Aided Design 36 (13): 1357–1369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoGui. 2018. “Graph-Based Ontology Reasoner.” http://www.lirmm.fr/cogui/.
   Google Scholar
• Danglade, Florence, Jean-Philippe Pernot, and Philippe Véron. 2014. “On the Use of Machine Learning to Defeature CAD Models for Simulation.” Computer-Aided Design and Applications 11 (3): 358–368.
   Google Scholar
• Danglade, Florence, Jean-Philippe Pernot, Philippe Véron, and Lionel Fine. 2017. “A Priori Evaluation of Simulation Models Preparation Processes Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques.” Computers in Industry 91: 45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demoly, FréDéRic, Aristeidis Matsokis, and Dimitris Kiritsis. 2012. “A Mereotopological Product Relationship Description Approach for Assembly Oriented Design.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 28 (6): 681–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Gilles, Jean-Christophe Cuillière, Vincent François, Jean-Claude Léon, and Roland Maranzana. 2008. “Adaptation of CAD Model Topology for Finite Element Analysis.” Computer-Aided Design 40 (2): 176–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, André, Kartik Asooja, Joao Jares, Stefan Decker, and Ratnesh Sahay. 2014. “A Semantic Web Platform for Automating the Interpretation of Finite Element Bio-Simulations.” In SWAT4LS. Citeseer.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, Andre, Margaret Jones, Kartik Asooja, Christos Bellos, Steve Elliott, Stefan Stenfelt, Panagiotis Hasapis, Christos Georgousopoulos, Torsten Marquardt, and Nenad Filipovic. 2013. “Towards a Semantic Representation for Multi-Scale Finite Element Biosimulation Experiments.” In 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), 1–5. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Shuming, Wei Zhao, Hongwei Lin, Fanqin Yang, and Xiang Chen. 2010. “Feature Suppression Based CAD Mesh Model Simplification.” Computer-Aided Design 42 (12): 1178–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruhier, Elise, Frédéric Demoly, Olivier Dutartre, Said Abboudi, and Samuel Gomes. 2015. “A Formal Ontology-Based Spatiotemporal Mereotopology for Integrated Product Design and Assembly Sequence Planning.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 29 (3): 495–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gujarathi, G. P., and Y.-S. Ma. 2011. “Parametric CAD/CAE Integration Using a Common Data Model.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 30 (3): 118–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JENA, Apache. 2018. “A Free and Open Source Java Framework for Building Semantic Web and Linked Data Applications.” 2018. https://jena.apache.org/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kadiri, Soumaya El, and Dimitris Kiritsis. 2015. “Ontologies in the Context of Product Lifecycle Management: State of the Art Literature Review.” International Journal of Production Research 53 (18): 5657–5658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Kyoung-Yun, David G Manley, and Hyungjeong Yang. 2006. “Ontology-Based Assembly Design and Information Sharing for Collaborative Product Development.” Computer-Aided Design 38 (12): 1233–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Junhwan, Michael J. Pratt, Raj G. Iyer, and Ram D. Sriram. 2008. “Standardized Data Exchange of CAD Models with Design Intent.” Computer-Aided Design 40 (7): 760–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, Jiing-Yih, Ming-Hsuan Wang, Pei-Pu Song, Chia-Hsiang Hsu, and Yao-Chen Tsai. 2018. “Recognition and Decomposition of Rib Features in Thin-Shell Plastic Parts for Finite Element Analysis.” Computer-Aided Design and Applications 15 (2): 264–279.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. Y., Cecil G. Armstrong, Mark A. Price, and J. H. Lamont. 2005. “A Small Feature Suppression/Unsuppression System for Preparing B-Rep Models for Analysis.” In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling, 113–124. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Léon, Jean-Claude, and Lionel Fine. 2005. “A New Approach to the Preparation of Models for FE Analyses.” International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 23 (2–4): 166–184.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Shang-Sheng, and Rajit Gadh. 1997. “Automatic Hexahedral Mesh Generation by Recursive Convex and Swept Volume Decomposition.” In 6th International Meshing Roundtable, Sandia National Laboratories, 217–31. Citeseer.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Yong, Rajit Gadh, and Timothy J. Tautges. 2001. “Feature Based Hex Meshing Methodology: Feature Recognition and Volume Decomposition.” Computer-Aided Design 33 (3): 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Cruz, Carmen, Ignacio Blanco, and M. Vila. 2011. “Ontologies Versus Relational Databases: Are They so Different? A Comparison.” Artificial Intelligence Review – AIR 38, doi:10.1007/s10462-011-9251-9.
   Google Scholar
• MatWeb. 2018. “Online Materials Information Resource.” http://www.matweb.com.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, Declan C., Christopher M. Tierney, Cecil G. Armstrong, and Trevor T. Robinson. 2015. “Defining Simulation Intent.” Computer-Aided Design 59: 50–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinfold, Martyn, and Craig Chapman. 2001. “The Application of KBE Techniques to the FE Model Creation of an Automotive Body Structure.” Computers in Industry 44 (1): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Trevor, G. Cecil, and M. Robin. 2011. “Automated Mixed Dimensional Modelling from 2D and 3D CAD Models.” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 47: 151–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salome. 2018. “CAE Software.” Version 8.1. salome.
   Google Scholar
• Shahwan, Ahmad, Jean-Claude Léon, Gilles Foucault, Moreno Trlin, and Olivier Palombi. 2013. “Qualitative Behavioral Reasoning from Components’ Interfaces to Components’ Functions for DMU Adaption to FE Analyses.” Computer-Aided Design 45 (2): 383–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffer, Alla. 2001. “Model Simplification for Meshing Using Face Clustering.” Computer-Aided Design 33 (13): 925–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffer, Alla, Michel Bercovier, T. E. D. BLACKER, and Jan Clements. 2000. “Virtual Topology Operators for Meshing.” International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications 10 (03): 309–331.
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, Mark S., Mark W. Beall, Robert M. O’bara, and Bruce E. Webster. 2004. “Toward Simulation-Based Design.” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 40 (12): 1575–1598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens plm software. 2018a. “NX.” http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/products/nx/index.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens plm software. 2018b. “Parasolid.” https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/products/open/parasolid/.
   Google Scholar
• Stratasys. 2018. “GrabCAD.” https://grabcad.com/library/radial-engine-163; https://grabcad.com/library/prusa-i3-mk3-solidworks-1%0D, https://grabcad.com/library/engine-2-0-liter-4-cylinder-88mm-bore-x-80mm-stroke-1%0D.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Wei, Qinyi Ma, and Shuang Chen. 2009. “A Framework for Automated Finite Element Analysis with an Ontology-Based Approach.” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 23 (12): 3209–3220. doi:10.1007/s12206-009-1005-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Liang, Christopher M. Tierney, Cecil G. Armstrong, and Trevor T. Robinson. 2016. “Automatic Decomposition of Complex Thin Walled CAD Models for Hexahedral Dominant Meshing.” Procedia Engineering 163: 225–237.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Liang, Christopher M. Tierney, Cecil G. Armstrong, and Trevor T. Robinson. 2017a. “An Enhanced Approach to Automatic Decomposition of Thin-Walled Components for Hexahedral-Dominant Meshing.” Engineering with Computers. doi:10.1007/s00366-017-0550-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Liang, Christopher M. Tierney, Cecil G Armstrong, and Trevor T Robinson. 2017b. “Decomposing Complex Thin-Walled CAD Models for Hexahedral-Dominant Meshing.” Computer-Aided Design. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2017.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo, B. A. 1996. “The Problem of Model Selection in Numerical Simulation.” In 3rd International Conference of Computational Structures Technology, Advances in Computational Methods for Simulation, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, Atul, Ashis Gopal Banerjee, and Satyandra K. Gupta. 2009. “A Survey of CAD Model Simplification Techniques for Physics-Based Simulation Applications.” Computer-Aided Design 41 (2): 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, Christopher M., Declan C. Nolan, Trevor T. Robinson, and Cecil G. Armstrong. 2014. “Managing Equivalent Representations of Design and Analysis Models.” Computer-Aided Design and Applications 11 (2): 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, Christopher M., Liang Sun, Trevor T. Robinson, and Cecil G. Armstrong. 2017. “Using Virtual Topology Operations to Generate Analysis Topology.” Computer-Aided Design 85 (April): 154–167. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2016.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataraman, Sashikumar, Milind Sohoni, and Rahul Rajadhyaksha. 2002. “Removal of Blends from Boundary Representation Models.” In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications, 83–94. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Vilmart, Harold, Jean-Claude Léon, and Federico Ulliana. 2018. “From CAD Assemblies Toward Knowledge-Based Assemblies Using an Intrinsic Knowledge-Based Assembly Model.” Computer-Aided Design and Applications 15 (3): 300–317. doi:10.1080/16864360.2017.1397882.
   Google Scholar
• W3C Working Group. 2012. “OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (Second Edition).” https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/.
   Google Scholar
• W3C Working Group. 2014. “Resource Description Framework Schema 1.1.”.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, Zhaohui, Qifu Wang, Qinghua Liu, Yingjun Wang, Jun Liu, and Gang Chen. 2016. “A Novel Approach for Automatic Reconstruction of Boundary Condition in Structure Analysis.” Advances in Engineering Software 96: 38–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yingzhong, and Xiaofang Luo. 2014. “An Ontology-Based Knowledge Model for Engineering Material Selections.” In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Innovative Design and Manufacturing (ICIDM), 53–58. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yingzhong, Xiaofang Luo, Jian Li, and Jennifer J Buis. 2013. “A Semantic Representation Model for Design Rationale of Products.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 27 (1): 13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., and C. H. Menq. 2002. “B-Rep Model Simplification by Automatic Fillet/Round Suppressing for Efficient Automatic Feature Recognition.” Computer-Aided Design 34 (2): 109–123. doi:10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00056-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar