Ebb and flow: design fixation and creativity in professional groups

References

• Abdelall, Esraa S., Matthew C. Frank, and Richard T. Stone. 2018. “A Study of Design Fixation Related to Additive Manufacturing.” Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 140 (4): 041702. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alipour, Leyla, Mohsen Faizi, Asghar M. Moradi, and Gholamreza Akrami. 2018. “A Review of Design Fixation: Research Directions and Key Factors.” International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 6 (1–2): 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2017.1320232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, Teresa M. 1983. “The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (2): 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badke-Schaub, Petra. 2013. “‘Perspectives on Design Creativity and Innovation Research’ [In Perspectives on Design Creativity and Innovation Research (Editorial Board of IJDCI)].” International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 1 (1): 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.754657.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Lynda. 2006. “Observation: A Complex Research Method.” Library Trends 55 (1): 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, Linden J., and Bo T. Christensen. 2019. “Advancing an Understanding of Design Cognition and Design Metacognition: Progress and Prospects.” Design Studies 65: 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilalić, Merim, Peter McLeod, and Fernand Gobet. 2008. “Why Good Thoughts Block Better Ones: The Mechanism of the Pernicious Einstellung (Set) Effect.” Cognition 108 (3): 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden, Margaret A. 2009. “Computer Models of Creativity.” AI Magazine 30 (3): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v30i3.2254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, Jennifer, Timothy W. Simpson, William B. Miney, and Kathryn W. Jablokow. 2021. ‘The Impact of Manufacturing Fixation in Design: Insights from Interviews with Engineering Professionals’. In Volume 2B: Advanced Manufacturing, V02BT02A025. Virtual, Online: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2021-72394.
   Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, Louis L. 1988. “An Ethnographic Perspective on Engineering Design.” Design Studies 9 (3): 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(88)90045-2.
   Google Scholar
• Button, Graham, and Wes Sharrock. 1996. “Project Work: The Organisation of Collaborative Design and Development in Software Engineering.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 5 (4): 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136711.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, Carlos, and Petra Badke-Schaub. 2011. “Fixation or Inspiration: Creative Problem Solving in Design.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 45 (2): 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01086.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, Philip. 2018. “Developing Theory-Driven Design Research.” Design Studies 56: 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, Philip, Ben Hicks, Steve Culley, and Tim Adlam. 2015. “A Foundational Observation Method for Studying Design Situations.” Journal of Engineering Design 26 (7–9): 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2015.1020418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, Philip, Ola Isaksson, Anja Maier, and Joshua Summers. 2022. “Sampling in Design Research: Eight Key Considerations.” Design Studies 78: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, Philip, and Melanie Kreye. 2017. “Uncertainty Driven Action (UDA) Model: A Foundation for Unifying Perspectives on Design Activity.” Design Science 3 (e26): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.28.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Bo T., and Linden J. Ball. 2014. “Studying Design Cognition in the Real World Using the “in Vivo” Methodology.” In The Routledge Companion to Design Research, 1st ed., edited by Paul A. Rodgers, and Joyce Yee, 317–330. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758466-29.
   Google Scholar
• Crilly, Nathan. 2015. “Fixation and Creativity in Concept Development: The Attitudes and Practices of Expert Designers.” Design Studies 38: 54–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, Nathan. 2018. “”Fixation” and “the Pivot”: Balancing Persistence with Flexibility in Design and Entrepreneurship.” International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 6 (1–2): 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2017.1362359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, Nathan. 2019. “Methodological Diversity and Theoretical Integration: Research in Design Fixation as an Example of Fixation in Research Design?” Design Studies 65: 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, Nathan, and Carlos Cardoso. 2017. “Where Next for Research on Fixation, Inspiration and Creativity in Design?” Design Studies 50: 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, Nathan, and Roxana Moroşanu Firth. 2019. “Creativity and Fixation in the Real World: Three Case Studies of Invention, Design and Innovation.” Design Studies 64: 169–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, Pieter M. A. 2012. “Faces of Product Pleasure: 25 Positive Emotions in Human-Product Interactions.” International Journal of Design 6 (2): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, Ap, and Teun Meurs. 2006. “Where Creativity Resides: The Generative Power of Unconscious Thought.” Consciousness and Cognition 15 (1): 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncker, Karl. 1945. “On Problem-Solving.” Psychological Monographs 58 (5): i–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., and Melissa E. Graebner. 2007. “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, Ronald A. 1996. “Imagery, Creativity, and Emergent Structure.” Consciousness and Cognition 5 (3): 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1996.0024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorineschi, Lorenzo, Francesco S. Frillici, and Federico Rotini. 2020. “Subjectivity of Novelty Metrics Based on Idea Decomposition.” International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 8 (4): 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1811775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorineschi, Lorenzo, Francesco S. Frillici, and Federico Rotini. 2022. “Refined Metric for A-Posteriori Novelty Assessments.” Journal of Engineering Design 33 (1): 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2021.1976397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorineschi, Lorenzo, and Federico Rotini. 2021. “Novelty Metrics in Engineering Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 32 (11): 590–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2021.1928024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, Michael J. 1998. Engineering Design: The Conceptual Stage. London: Heinemann Educational Books. Originally published in 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, Xiao, Larry Leifer, and Linlin Shui. 2021. “Situated Emotion and Its Constructive Role in Collaborative Design: A Mixed-Method Study of Experienced Designers.” Design Studies 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, Joy P. 1950. “Creativity.” American Psychologist 5 (9): 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, Andrew B., and Beth A. Bechky. 2006. “When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work.” Organization Science 17 (4): 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, Spencer H., and Elizabeth D. Rouse. 2014. “Let’s Dance! Elastic Coordination in Creative Group Work: A Qualitative Study of Modern Dancers.” Academy of Management Journal 57 (5): 1256–1283. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, Spencer H., Elizabeth D. Rouse, Colin M. Fisher, and Teresa M. Amabile. 2022. “The Turn toward Creative Work.” Academy of Management Collections 1 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5465/amc.2021.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, Sarah, and James W. Berry. 2023. “Toward a Meta-Theory of Creativity Forms: How Novelty and Usefulness Shape Creativity.” Academy of Management Review 48 (3): 504–529. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, Sarah, and Chia-Yu Kou. 2013. “Collective Engagement in Creative Tasks: The Role of Evaluation in the Creative Process in Groups.” Administrative Science Quarterly 58 (3): 346–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213498591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatchuel, Armand, Pascal Le Masson, and Benoit Weil. 2011. “Teaching Innovative Design Reasoning: How Concept–Knowledge Theory Can Help Overcome Fixation Effects.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 25 (1): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089006041000048X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, Scarlett R., Chia-Chen Chang, Jesse Krantzler, and Brian P. Bailey. 2009. “Getting Inspired!: Understanding How and Why Examples Are Used in Creative Design Practice.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 87–96. Boston, MA, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518717.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, George P. 1985. “Temporal Stability and Response-Order Biases in Participant Descriptions of Organizational Decisions.” Academy of Management Journal 28 (4): 943–950. https://doi.org/10.5465/256247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson, David G., and Steven M. Smith. 1991. “Design Fixation.” Design Studies 12 (1): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., and Keith Oatley. 1989. “The Language of Emotions: An Analysis of a Semantic Field.” Cognition & Emotion 3 (2): 81–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938908408075.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, Nicholas W., and Steven M. Smith. 2011. “Collaborative Fixation: Effects of Others’ Ideas on Brainstorming.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 25 (3): 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppel, Rebecca H., and Benjamin C. Storm. 2014. “Escaping Mental Fixation: Incubation and Inhibition in Creative Problem Solving.” Memory 22 (4): 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.789914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, Ann. 1999. “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data.” Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 691–710. https://doi.org/10.2307/259349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, Ann, Clive Smallman, Haridimos Tsoukas, and Andrew H. Van De Ven. 2013. “Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Jung Joo, Miia Jaatinen, Anna Salmi, Tuuli Mattelmäki, Riitta Smeds, and Mari Holopainen. 2018. “Design Choices Framework for Co-Creation Projects.” International Journal of Design 12 (2): 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liikkanen, Lassi A., and Matti Perttula. 2010. “Inspiring Design Idea Generation: Insights from a Memory-Search Perspective.” Journal of Engineering Design 21 (5): 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820802353297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsey, Julie S. 2013. “Advancing the Scholarship of Design Creativity Research [in Perspectives on design creativity and innovation research (Editorial Board of IJDCI)].” International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 1 (1): 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.754657.
   Google Scholar
• Linsey, Julie S., Ian Tseng, Katherine Fu, Jonathan Cagan, Kristin L. Wood, and Christian D. Schunn. 2010. “A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty.” Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME 132 (4). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luchins, Abraham S., and Edith H. Luchins. 1959. Rigidity of Behavior: A Variational Approach to the Effect of Einstellung. Eugene: University of Oregon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, Norman R. F. 1931. “Reasoning in Humans. II. The Solution of a Problem and Its Appearance in Consciousness.” Journal of Comparative Psychology 12 (2): 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071361.
   Google Scholar
• Mantere, Saku, and Mikko Ketokivi. 2013. “Reasoning in Organization Science.” Academy of Management Review 38 (1): 70–89. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. n.d. ‘Contingency’. Merriam-Webster. Accessed October 11, 2023. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/contingency.
   Google Scholar
• Metiu, Anca, and Nancy P. Rothbard. 2013. “Task Bubbles, Artifacts, Shared Emotion, and Mutual Focus of Attention: A Comparative Study of the Microprocesses of Group Engagement.” Organization Science 24 (2): 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, Mark, and Martine R. Haas. 2018. “Rethinking Teams: From Bounded Membership to Dynamic Participation.” Organization Science 29 (2): 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagai, Yukari, and John Gero. 2012. “Design Creativity.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (4): 237–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.642495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, Weihua, and Dan Liu. 2009. “Enhancing Creativity: A Comparison between Effects of an Indicative Instruction 'to Be Creative' and a More Elaborate Heuristic Instruction on Chinese Student Creativity.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3 (2): 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onarheim, Balder. 2012. “Creativity from Constraints in Engineering Design: Lessons Learned at Coloplast.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (4): 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.631904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, Signe. 2020. “Staging Negotiation Spaces: A Co-Design Framework.” Design Studies 68: 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, Mark, and Duncan Sanderson. 1998. “Coordinating Joint Design Work: The Role of Communication and Artefacts.” Design Studies 19 (3): 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(98)00008-8.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, Philip M., and Dennis W. Organ. 1986. “Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects.” Journal of Management 12 (4): 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, Terry, and John S. Gero. 1996. “Design and Other Types of Fixation.” Design Studies 17 (4): 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00023-3.
   Google Scholar
• Rangarajan, Vimalkrishnan, Prasad S. Onkar, Alison De Kruiff, and Deirdre Barron. 2022. “A Descriptive Phenomenological Approach to Perception of Affective Quality in Design Inspiration.” Design Studies 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Mark A. 2012. “How Design Engineers Spend Their Time: Job Content and Task Satisfaction.” Design Studies 33 (4): 391–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, Neal J., and Kathleen D. Vohs. 2012. “Hindsight Bias.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (5): 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612454303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, Mark A., and Garrett J. Jaeger. 2012. “The Standard Definition of Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 24 (1): 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, Prabir, and Amaresh Chakrabarti. 2015. “Creativity: Generic Definition, Tests, Factors and Methods.” International Journal of Design Science and Technology 21 (1): 7–37.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A., and Martin Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Eliaz. 2004. “Incubation in Insight Problem Solving.” Creativity Research Journal 16 (1): 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, Christina E., and Jill E. Perry-Smith. 2008. “The Emergence of Team Creative Cognition: The Role of Diverse Outside Ties, Sociocognitive Network Centrality, and Team Evolution.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2 (1): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sio, Ut Na, Kenneth Kotovsky, and Jonathan Cagan. 2015. “Fixation or Inspiration? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Role of Examples on Design Processes.” Design Studies 39: 70–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Steven M. 1995. “Getting into and out of Mental Ruts: A Theory of Fixation, Incubation, and Insight.” In The Nature of Insight, edited by Robert J. Sternberg, and Janet E. Davidson, 229–251. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smulders, Frido E. 2004. “Co-Operation in NPD: Coping with Different Learning Styles.” Creativity and Innovation Management 13 (4): 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00315.x.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, James P. 1980. Participant Observation. New York: Holt: Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Patricia D. 2006. Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Toivonen, Tuukka, Onyaglanu Idoko, Harsh K. Jha, and Sarah Harvey. 2023. “Creative Jolts: Exploring How Entrepreneurs Let Go of Ideas During Creative Revision.” Academy of Management Journal 66 (3): 829–858. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, Luis A., and Nathan Crilly. 2016. “Inspiration and Fixation: Questions, Methods, Findings, and Challenges.” Design Studies 42: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, Vimal, Olufunmilola Atilola, Nicole Esposito, and Julie Linsey. 2014. “A Study on the Role of Physical Models in the Mitigation of Design Fixation.” Journal of Engineering Design 25 (1–3): 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2014.885934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, Vimal, and Julie Linsey. 2020. “Designing with Examples: A Study on the Role of Familiarity, Warnings and Physical Modelling.” Journal of Engineering Design 31 (11–12): 552–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2020.1851356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youmans, Robert J. 2011. “The Effects of Physical Prototyping and Group Work on the Reduction of Design Fixation.” Design Studies 32 (2): 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youmans, Robert J., and Thomaz Arciszewski. 2014. “Design Fixation: Classifications and Modern Methods of Prevention.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM 28 (2): 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060414000043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Wenlin, and Jin Ma. 2022. “Collaborative Framing in Professional Design Practice.” In Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the International Association of Societies of Design Research (iasdr 2021), edited by Gerhard Bruyns, and Huaxin Wei, 81–97. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_6.
   Google Scholar