Artificial hair implantation for hair restoration

References

• Tabolli S, Sampogna F, di Pietro C, et al. Health status, coping strategies, and alexithymia in subjects with androgenetic alopecia: a questionnaire study. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013;14(2):139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Renaud HJ, Bamimore M. Platelet-rich plasma for androgenetic alopecia: efficacy differences between men and women. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(6):e14143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Bamimore MA, Foley KA. Efficacy of non-surgical treatments for androgenetic alopecia in men and women: a systematic review with network meta-analyses, and an assessment of evidence quality. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;33(6):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka H. Length of hair affects P1 and N170 latencies for perception of women’s faces. Percept Mot Skills. 2018;125(6):1011–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranwell W, Sinclair R, et al. Male androgenetic alopecia. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A,., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi A, Anzalone A, Fortuna MC, et al. Multi-therapies in androgenetic alopecia: review and clinical experiences. Dermatol Ther. 2016;29(6):424–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avci P, Gupta GK, Clark J, et al. Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss. Lasers Surg Med. 2014;46(2):144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt M, Charles G, Heyman E, et al. HairMax laserComb® laser phototherapy device in the treatment of male androgenetic alopecia: a randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled, multicentre trial. Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29(5):283–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dua A, Dua K. Follicular unit extraction hair transplant. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2010;3(2):76–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katzer T, Leite Junior A, Beck R, et al. Physiopathology and current treatments of androgenetic alopecia: going beyond androgens and anti-androgens. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(5):e13059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Renaud HJ, Halaas Y, et al. Exosomes: a new effective non-surgical therapy for androgenetic alopecia? SKINmed. 2020;18(2):96–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanke CW, Bergfeld WF. Fiber implantation for pattern baldness. Review of complications in forty-one patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1981;4(3):278–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchernev G, Sheta M, Rahoui M, et al. Biofibre hair implant: what is new, what is true? J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2016;30(2 Suppl 2):27–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santiago M, Pérez-Rangel R, D’Ugo A, et al. Artificial hair fiber restoration in the treatment of scalp scars. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(1):35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triwongwaranat D, Boonchai W, Subchookul C, et al. Synthetic hair reactions and treatment of complications: case reports. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(10):2697–2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGregorio VR, Rauscher G, DiGregorio VR. Experience with the complications of synthetic-hair implantations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;68(4):498–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näslund-Koch C, Thyssen JP, Zachariae C, et al. Side effects after artificial hair implants: 2 case reports. JAAD Case Rep. 2020;6(8):740–742.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanke CW, Bergfeld WF. Fiber implantation for pattern baldness. JAMA. 1979;241(2):146–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanke CW, Norins AL, Pantzer JG, et al. Hair implant complications. JAMA. 1981;245(13):1344–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal M. Modern artificial hair implantation: a pilot study of 10 patients. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008;7(4):315–323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mysore V. Controversy: synthetic hairs and their role in hair restoration? Int J Trichology. 2010;2(1):42–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CFR – Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 [Internet]; [cited 2020 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=895.101.
   Google Scholar
• Roccia M, França K, Castillo D, et al. Artificial hair: by the dawn to automatic Biofibre® hair implant. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018; Dec 306(1):156–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shiell R. Notes from the Editor Emeritus. Hair Transplant Forum Int. 2002;12(5):176–176.
   Google Scholar
• Artificial Hair Fibers [Internet]. ISHRS. 2017; [cited 2020 Dec 23]. Available from: https://ishrs.org/artificial-hair-fibers/.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos O, Tchernev G, Chokoeva AA, et al. Biofibre hair implant – impact on the quality of life. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2016;30(2 Suppl 2):21–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mysore V. Synthetic hairs: should they be used? Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2006;72(1):5–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Said AA-H, Albzour BM, Santiago M, et al. Automatic artificial hair implant: safety and efficacy in androgenetic alopecia. a prospective study with a highly biocompatible fiber. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(1):38–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lotti T, Tirant M, Said AR, et al. Clinical updating study at 3 years on 278 patients treated by modern artificial hair implant technique (automatic biofibre®). Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(1):e13194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serdev N, D Erme AM, Hercogova J, et al. Polyamide hair implant (biofibre®): evaluation of efficacy and safety in a group of 133 patients. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2015;29(1 Suppl):103–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Satolli F, Rovesti M, Bogdan Moran AB, et al. Biofibre® artificial hair implant: retrospective study on 1,518 patients with alopecia and present role in hair surgery. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(4):e12985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepaw MI. Therapy and histopathology of complications from synthetic fiber implants for hair replacement. A presentation of one hundred cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1980;3(2):195–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L-L, Wang Y-Y, Yang Z-H, et al. Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? Mil Med Res. 2020;7(1):7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Health Economics | About Methodology Development [Internet]; [cited 2020 Dec 23]. Available from: https://www.ihe.ca/research-programs/rmd/cssqac/cssqac-about.
   Google Scholar
• GRADE handbook [Internet]. Introduction to GRADE Handbook; [cited 2020 Dec 23]. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html.
   Google Scholar
• Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, et al. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23(2):60–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cranwell WC, Sinclair R. Familial frontal fibrosing alopecia treated with dutasteride, minoxidil and artificial hair transplantation. Australas J Dermatol. 2017;58(3):e94–e96. Aug
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondyurina I, Kondyurin A. Foreign body reaction (immune respond) for artificial implants can be avoided. arXiv:190502500 [physics] [Internet]. 2019 Jul 18; [cited 2020 Dec 23]; Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02500.
   Google Scholar
• Mariani E, Lisignoli G, Borzì RM, et al. Biomaterials: foreign bodies or tuners for the immune response? Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(3):636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz S, Rammelt S, Scharnweber D, et al. Immune responses to implants – a review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2011;32(28):6692–6709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh Z, Brooks PJ, Barzilay O, et al. Macrophages, foreign body giant cells and their response to implantable biomaterials. Materials. 2015;8(9):5671–5701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20(2):86–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JM. Biological responses to materials. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2001;31(1):81–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gretzer C, Emanuelsson L, Liljensten E, et al. The inflammatory cell influx and cytokines changes during transition from acute inflammation to fibrous repair around implanted materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006;17(6):669–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JM. Inflammatory response to implants. ASAIO Trans. 1988;34(2):101–107. Jun
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenneth Ward W. A review of the foreign-body response to subcutaneously-implanted devices: the role of macrophages and cytokines in biofouling and fibrosis. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(5):768–777.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson JM. Chapter 39 – biocompatibility and bioresponse to biomaterials. In: Atala A, Lanza R, Mikos AG, Nerem R, editors. Principles of regenerative medicine. (3rd ed.). Boston: Academic Press; 2019. p. 675–694. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128098806000394
   Google Scholar
• Peluso AM, Fanti PA, Monti M, Bardazzi F, et al. Cutaneous complications of artificial hair implantation: a pathological study. Dermatology. 1992;184(2):129–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar