PASI 100 response rates in moderate to severe psoriasis: a systematic literature review and analysis of clinical practice guidelines

References

• Girolomoni G, Strohal R, Puig L, et al. The role of IL-23 and the IL-23/TH 17 immune axis in the pathogenesis and treatment of psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(10):1616–1626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi R, Symmons DP, Griffiths CE, Identification and Management of Psoriasis and Associated ComorbidiTy (IMPACT) project team, et al. Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of incidence and prevalence. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(2):377–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley RG, Krueger GG, Griffiths CE. Psoriasis: epidemiology, clinical features, and quality of life. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(Suppl 2):ii18–23. discussion ii24-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obradors M, Blanch C, Comellas M, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with psoriasis: a systematic review of the European literature. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(11):2739–2754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogra S, Mahajan R. Psoriasis: epidemiology, clinical features, co-morbidities, and clinical scoring. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016;7(6):471–480.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5):826–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff KL, Karimkhani C, Boyers LN, et al. The global burden of psoriatic skin disease. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(6):1665–1668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spuls PI, Lecluse LL, Poulsen ML, et al. How good are clinical severity and outcome measures for psoriasis? Quantitative evaluation in a systematic review. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(4):933–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puzenat E, Bronsard V, Prey S, et al. What are the best outcome measures for assessing plaque psoriasis severity? A systematic review of the literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(Suppl 2):10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis-oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica. 1978;157(4):238–244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strober B, Papp KA, Lebwohl M, et al. Clinical meaningfulness of complete skin clearance in psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75(1):77–82 e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeshita J, Callis Duffin K, Shin DB, et al. Patient-reported outcomes for psoriasis patients with clear versus almost clear skin in the clinical setting. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(4):633–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEBM., Medicine. CfEB. CEBM Levels of Evidence 2011. University of Oxford; 2011 [cited 2013 Apr 11]. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025.
   Google Scholar
• Elmets CA, Lim HW, Stoff B, et al. Joint American Academy of Dermatology-National Psoriasis Foundation guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with phototherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(3):775–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter A, Strober BE, Kaplan DH, et al. Joint AAD-NPF guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(4):1029–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig L, Carrascosa JM, Carretero G, Spanish Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, et al. Spanish evidence-based guidelines on the treatment of psoriasis with biologic agents, 2013. Part 1: on efficacy and choice of treatment. Spanish Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013;104(8):694–709.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanchez-Regana M, Aldunce Soto MJ, Belinchon Romero I, et al. Evidence-based guidelines of the spanish psoriasis group on the use of biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis in difficult-to-treat sites (nails, scalp, palms, and soles). Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105(10):923–934.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nast A, Gisondi P, Ormerod AD, et al. European S3-Guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris-Update 2015-Short version-EDF in cooperation with EADV and IPC. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(12):2277–2294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nast A, Jacobs A, Rosumeck S, et al. Methods report: European S3-Guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris-update 2015-EDF in cooperation with EADV and IPC. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(12):e1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nast A, Spuls PI, van der Kraaij G, et al. European S3-Guideline on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris - Update Apremilast and Secukinumab - EDF in cooperation with EADV and IPC. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(12):1951–1963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amatore F, Villani AP, Tauber M, Psoriasis Research Group of the French Society of Dermatology (Groupe de Recherche sur le Psoriasis de la Société Française de Dermatologie), et al. French guidelines on the use of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adults. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(3):464–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisondi P, Altomare G, Ayala F, et al. Italian guidelines on the systemic treatments of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(5):774–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauden E, Puig L, Ferrandiz C, the Spanish Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, et al. Consensus document on the evaluation and treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(Suppl 2):1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong AW, Villanueva Quintero DG, Echeverria CM, et al. Body region involvement and quality of life in psoriasis: analysis of a randomized controlled trial of adalimumab. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016;17(6):691–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon KB, Langley RG, Leonardi C, et al. Clinical response to adalimumab treatment in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: double-blind, randomized controlled trial and open-label extension study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(4):598–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon K, Papp K, Poulin Y, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated continuously over 3 years: results from an open-label extension study for patients from REVEAL. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(2):241–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter A, Tyring SK, Gordon K, et al. Adalimumab therapy for moderate to severe psoriasis: a randomized, controlled phase III trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(1):106–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp KA, Armstrong AW, Reich K, et al. Adalimumab efficacy in patients with psoriasis who received or did not respond to prior systemic therapy: a pooled post hoc analysis of results from three double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016;17(1):79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp K, Bachelez H, Costanzo A, et al. Clinical similarity of biosimilar ABP 501 to adalimumab in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(6):1093–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurat JH, Stingl G, Dubertret L, for the CHAMPION Study Investigators, et al. Efficacy and safety results from the randomized controlled comparative study of adalimumab vs. methotrexate vs. placebo in patients with psoriasis (CHAMPION). Br J Dermatol. 2008;158(3):558–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurat JH, Langley RG, Reich K, et al. Relationship between methotrexate dosing and clinical response in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: subanalysis of the CHAMPION study. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165(2):399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarini AA, Poulin Y, Menter A, et al. Analysis of body regions and components of PASI scores during adalimumab or methotrexate treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13(5):554–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strober BE, Crowley JJ, Yamauchi PS, et al. Efficacy and safety results from a phase III, randomized controlled trial comparing the safety and efficacy of briakinumab with etanercept and placebo in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165(3):661–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Griffiths CEM, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching to ixekizumab in etanercept non-responders: a subanalysis from two Phase III randomized clinical trials in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UNCOVER-2 and -3). Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18(2):273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon KB, Blauvelt A, Papp KA, et al. Phase 3 trials of ixekizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):345–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb AB, Lacour JP, Korman N, et al. Treatment outcomes with ixekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who have or have not received prior biological therapies: an integrated analysis of two Phase III randomized studies. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(4):679–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths CE, Reich K, Lebwohl M, et al. Comparison of ixekizumab with etanercept or placebo in moderate-to-severe psoriasis (UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3): results from two phase 3 randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):541–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemeny L, Berggren L, Dossenbach M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in patients with plaque psoriasis across different degrees of disease severity: results from UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3. J Dermatol Treatment. 2019;30(1):19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp KA, Leonardi CL, Blauvelt A, et al. Ixekizumab treatment for psoriasis: integrated efficacy analysis of three double-blinded, controlled studies (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3). Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(3):674–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yosipovitch G, Reich A, Steinhoff M, et al. Impact of ixekizumab treatment on itch and psoriasis area and severity index in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: an integrated analysis of two Phase III randomized studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2018;8(4):621–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adsit S, Zaldivar ER, Sofen H, Adsit SZERSHD-CIM-GCPEOPLMXFT, et al. Secukinumab is efficacious and safe in hispanic patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled analysis of four phase 3 trials. Adv Ther. 2017;34(6):1327–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb AB, Blauvelt A, Thaci D, et al. Certolizumab pegol for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: Results through 48 weeks from 2 phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies (CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(2):302–314.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley RG, Armstrong AW, Lebwohl MG, et al. Efficacy and safety of brodalumab in patients with psoriasis who had inadequate responses to ustekinumab: subgroup analysis of two randomized phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180(2):306–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebwohl M, Strober B, Menter A, et al. Phase 3 studies comparing brodalumab with ustekinumab in psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(14):1318–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMichael A, Desai SR, Qureshi A, et al. Efficacy and safety of brodalumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and skin of color: results from the pooled AMAGINE-2/-3 randomized trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019;20(2):267–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp KA, Reich K, Paul C, et al. A prospective phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of brodalumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175(2):273–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp KA, Gordon KB, Langley RG, et al. Impact of previous biologic use on the efficacy and safety of brodalumab and ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: integrated analysis of the randomized controlled trials AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3 [Article]. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(2):320–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig L, Lebwohl M, Bachelez H, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of brodalumab in the treatment of psoriasis: 120-week results from the randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled phase 3 AMAGINE-2 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(2):352–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauvelt A, Gooderham M, Iversen L, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Results through 108 weeks of a randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial (UNCOVER-3). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(5):855–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Sofen H, et al. Continuous dosing versus interrupted therapy with ixekizumab: an integrated analysis of two phase 3 trials in psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(6):1004–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauvelt A, Muram TM, See K, et al. Improvements in psoriasis within different body regions vary over time following treatment with ixekizumab. J Dermatol Treatment. 2018;29(3):220–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imafuku S, Torisu-Itakura H, Nishikawa A, Japanese UNCOVER-1 Study Group, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab treatment in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Subgroup analysis of a placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (UNCOVER-1). J Dermatol. 2017;44(11):1285–1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley RG, Papp K, Gooderham M, of the IXORA-P Investigators, et al. Efficacy and safety of continuous every-2-week dosing of ixekizumab over 52 weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a randomized phase III trial (IXORA-P). Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(6):1315–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul C, Griffiths CEM, van de Kerkhof PCM, et al. Ixekizumab provides superior efficacy compared with ustekinumab over 52 weeks of treatment: results from IXORA-S, a phase 3 study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(1):70–79.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeki H, Nakagawa H, Ishii T, et al. Efficacy and safety of open-label ixekizumab treatment in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis and generalized pustular psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(6):1148–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeki H, Nakagawa H, Nakajo K, Japanese Ixekizumab Study Group, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab treatment for Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis and generalized pustular psoriasis: Results from a 52-week, open-label, phase 3 study (UNCOVER-J). J Dermatol. 2017;44(4):355–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley RG, Elewski BE, Lebwohl M, et al. Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis–results of two phase 3 trials. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(4):326–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagel J, Nia J, Hashim PW, et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (16-Week CLARITY Results) [Article. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2018;8(4):571–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissonnette R, Luger T, Thaci D, et al. Secukinumab sustains good efficacy and favourable safety in moderate-to-severe psoriasis after up to 3 years of treatment: results from a double-blind extension study. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(4):1033–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissonnette R, Luger T, Thaci D, et al. Secukinumab demonstrates high sustained efficacy and a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis through 5 years of treatment (SCULPTURE Extension Study). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(9):1507–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauvelt A, Prinz JC, Gottlieb AB, the FEATURE Study Group, et al. Secukinumab administration by pre-filled syringe: efficacy, safety and usability results from a randomized controlled trial in psoriasis (FEATURE). Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(2):484–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb AB, Blauvelt A, Prinz JC, et al. Secukinumab self-administration by prefilled syringe maintains reduction of plaque psoriasis severity over 52 weeks: results of the FEATURE trial. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(10):1226–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacour JP, Paul C, Jazayeri S, et al. Secukinumab administration by autoinjector maintains reduction of plaque psoriasis severity over 52 weeks: results of the randomized controlled JUNCTURE trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(5):847–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtsuki M, Morita A, Abe M, the ERASURE Study Japanese subgroup, et al. Secukinumab efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: subanalysis from ERASURE, a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. J Dermatol. 2014;41(12):1039–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okubo Y, Ohtsuki M, Morita A, Extension Study Japanese Subgroup, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of secukinumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: 3-year results of a double-blind extension study. J Dermatol. 2019;46(3):186–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul C, Lacour JP, Tedremets L, the JUNCTURE study group, et al. Efficacy, safety and usability of secukinumab administration by autoinjector/pen in psoriasis: a randomized, controlled trial (JUNCTURE). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(6):1082–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich K, Puig L, Szepietowski JC, et al. Secukinumab dosing optimization in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: results from the randomised, open-label OPTIMISE study. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(2):304–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sticherling M, Mrowietz U, Augustin M, et al. Secukinumab is superior to fumaric acid esters in treating patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who are naive to systemic treatments: results from the randomized controlled PRIME trial. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(4):1024–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strober B, Gottlieb AB, Sherif B, et al. Secukinumab sustains early patient-reported outcome benefits through 1 year: Results from 2 phase III randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials comparing secukinumab with etanercept. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(4):655–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaci D, Blauvelt A, Reich K, et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(3):400–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Griffiths CE, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the continuous treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Results from the phase III, double-blinded, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):405–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris LK, Ott E, Jiang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, administered with a novel patient-controlled injector (One-Press), for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the phase 3 ORION study. J Dermatol Treatment. 2020;31(2):152–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths CEM, Papp KA, Kimball AB, et al. Long-term efficacy of guselkumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the Phase 3 VOYAGE 1 Trial through two years. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(8):826–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich K, Armstrong AW, Foley P, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis with randomized withdrawal and retreatment: results from the phase III, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 2 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):418–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtsuki M, Fujita H, Watanabe M, et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: results from the SustaIMM phase 2/3 trial. J Dermatol. 2019;46(8):686–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elewski B, Menter A, Crowley J, et al. Sustained and continuously improved efficacy of tildrakizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;31(8):763–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp KA, Reich K, Blauvelt A, et al. Efficacy of tildrakizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials at weeks 12 and 28. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(6):1098–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich K, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, et al. Tildrakizumab versus placebo or etanercept for chronic plaque psoriasis (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2): results from two randomised controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):276–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich K, Warren RB, Iversen L, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: pooled analyses of two randomised phase III clinical trials (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2) through 148 weeks. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(3):605–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball AB, Gordon KB, Fakharzadeh S, et al. Long-term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 1 trial through up to 3 years. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(4):861–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball AB, Papp KA, Wasfi Y, on behalf of the PHOENIX 1 investigators, et al. Long-term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated for up to 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(12):1535–1545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley RG, Lebwohl M, Krueger GG, PHOENIX 2 Investigators, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, with and without dosing adjustment, in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 2 study through 5 years of follow-up. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(5):1371–1383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi CL, Kimball AB, Papp KA, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 76-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 1). Lancet. 2008;371(9625):1665–1674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai TF, Ho JC, Song M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Taiwanese and Korean patients (PEARL). J Dermatol Sci. 2011;63(3):154–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Zheng M, Song M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Chinese patients with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis: results from a phase 3 clinical trial (LOTUS). J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12(2):166–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon KB, Strober B, Lebwohl M, et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2018;392(10148):650–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp K, Bachelez H, Costanzo A, et al. Clinical similarity of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab after single transition: long-term results from a randomized controlled, double-blind, 52-week, phase III trial in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(6):1562–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp KA, Langley RG, Lebwohl M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 52-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 2). Lancet. 2008;371(9625):1675–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich K, Pinter A, Lacour JP, on behalf of the IXORA-S investigators, et al. Comparison of ixekizumab with ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: 24-week results from IXORA-S, a phase III study. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(4):1014–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Bukhalo M, et al. Risankizumab versus ustekinumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(16):1551–1560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich K, Langley RG, Papp KA, et al. A 52-week trial comparing briakinumab with methotrexate in patients with psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(17):1586–1596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadavid E, Rompoti N, Theodoropoulos K, et al. Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(7):1173–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircik L, Bagel J, Korman N, Unite Study Group, et al. Utilization of narrow-band ultraviolet light B therapy and etanercept for the treatment of psoriasis (UNITE): efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008;7(3):245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagel J. Adalimumab plus narrowband ultraviolet B light phototherapy for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011;10(4):366–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers RJ. Assessing psoriasis severity and outcomes for clinical trials and routine clinical practice. Dermatol Clin. 2015;33(1):57–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley RG, Ellis CN. Evaluating psoriasis with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Psoriasis Global Assessment, and Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51(4):563–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampogna F, Sera F, Abeni D, IDI Multipurpose Psoriasis Research on Vital Experiences (IMPROVE) Investigators. Measures of clinical severity, quality of life, and psychological distress in patients with psoriasis: a cluster analysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122(3):602–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong AW, Puig L, Joshi A, et al. Comparison of biologics and oral treatments for plaque psoriasis: a meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(3):258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seneschal J, Lacour JP, Bewley A, et al. A multinational, prospective, observational study to estimate complete skin clearance in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PSOriasis treated with BIOlogics in a REAL world setting (PSO-BIO-REAL). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(11):2566–2573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudonis T, Gliebute A, Grigaityte AG, et al. A six-year analysis of biological therapy for severe psoriasis in a lithuanian reference centre of dermatovenereology. Medicina. 2020;56(6):275. (Kaunas).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustin M, Jullien D, Martin A, et al. Real-world evidence of secukinumab in psoriasis treatment - a meta-analysis of 43 studies. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(6):1174–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar