A randomized split-face clinical trial of conventional vs indoor-daylight photodynamic therapy for the treatment of multiple actinic keratosis of the face and scalp and photoaging

References

• Calzavara-Pinton P, Haedersdal M, Barber K, et al. Structured expert consensus on actinic keratosis: treatment algorithm focusing on daylight PDT. J Cutan Med Surg. 2017;21(1_suppl):3S–16S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Figueras MT, Carrato C, Sáenz X, et al. Actinic keratosis with atypical basal cells (AK I) is the most common lesion associated with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(5):991–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton CA, Szeimies RM, Basset-Séguin N, et al. European Dermatology Forum guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy 2019 Part 2: emerging indications – field cancerization, photorejuvenation and inflammatory/infective dermatoses. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(1):17–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzavara-Pinton PG, Venturini M, Sala R. Photodynamic therapy: update 2006. Part 1: photochemistry and photobiology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol. 2007;21(3):293–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moggio E, Arisi M, Zane C, et al. A randomized split-face clinical trial analyzing daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate vs ingenol mebutate gel for the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses of the face and the scalp. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2016;16:161–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szeimïes RM. Pain perception during photodynamic therapy: why is daylight PDT with methyl aminolevulinate almost pain-free? A review on the underlying mechanisms, clinical reflections and resulting opportunities. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2018;153(6):793–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegell SR, Haedersdal M, Eriksen P, et al. Photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses with 8% and 16% methyl aminolaevulinate and home-based daylight exposure: a double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160(6):1308–1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton CA, Wulf HC, Szeimies RM, et al. Practical approach to the use of daylight photodynamic therapy with topical methyl aminolevulinate for actinic keratosis: a European consensus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(9):1718–1723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegell SR, Fabricius S, Heydenreich J, et al. Weather conditions and daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy: protoporphyrin IX-weighted daylight doses measured in six geographical locations. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(1):186–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerche CM, Heerfordt IM, Heydenreich J, et al. Alternatives to outdoor daylight illumination for photodynamic therapy–use of greenhouses and artificial light sources. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(3):309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordon S, Vignion-Dewalle AS, Thecua E, et al. Can daylight-PDT be performed indoor? G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2018;153(6):811–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellner C, Bauriedl S, Hollstein S, et al. Simulated-daylight photodynamic therapy with BF-200 aminolaevulinic acid for actinic keratosis: assessment of the efficacy and tolerability in a retrospective study. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(4):1146–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegell SR, Heydenreich J, Fabricius S, et al. Continuous ultra-low-intensity artificial daylight is not as effective as red LED light in photodynamic therapy of multiple actinic keratoses. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2011;27(6):280–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahl S. Protoporphyrin IX dimethyl ester. 2014. [cited 2020 Apr 25]. Available at: http://omlc.ogi.edu/spectra/PhotochemCAD/html/149.html.
   Google Scholar
• Galderma (U.K) Ltd. Metvix 160 mg/g cream: summary of product characteristics. 2021. [cited 2021 Apr 23]. Available at: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/11913.
   Google Scholar
• Arisi M, Zane C, Polonioli M, et al. Effects of MAL-PDT, ingenol mebutate and diclofenac plus hyaluronate gel monitored by high-frequency ultrasound and digital dermoscopy in actinic keratosis – a randomized trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(6):1225–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zane C, Facchinetti E, Rossi MT, et al. A randomized clinical trial of photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate vs. diclofenac 3% plus hyaluronic acid gel for the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(5):1143–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babilas P, Kohl E, Maisch T, et al. In vitro and in vivo comparison of two different light sources for topical photodynamic therapy. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154(4):712–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zane C, Capezzera R, Sala R, et al. Clinical and echographic analysis of photodynamic therapy using methylaminolevulinate as sensitizer in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(3):203–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dover JS, Bhatia AC, Stewart B, et al. Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid combined with intense pulsed light in the treatment of photoaging. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(10):1247–1252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szeimies RM, Karrer S, Radakovic-Fijan S, et al. Photodynamic therapy using topical methyl 5-aminolevulinate compared with cryotherapy for actinic keratosis: a prospective, randomized study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(2):258–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zane C, Fabiano A, Arisi M, et al. A randomized split-face clinical trial of photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate versus ingenol mebutate gel for the treatment of multiple actinic keratoses of the face and scalp. Dermatology. 2016;232(4):472–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Gorman SM, Clowry J, Manley M, et al. Artificial white light vs daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(6):638–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar