175
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A 52-week follow-up, multi-center, randomized, double-blinded comparison of efficacy and safety of two hyaluronic acid fillers for the treatment of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds in Chinese population

, , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2378165 | Received 01 May 2024, Accepted 17 Jun 2024, Published online: 14 Jul 2024

References

  • Barton F E JR, Gyimesi IM. Anatomy of the nasolabial fold. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(5):1276–1280. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199710000-00032.
  • Tower JI, Gordon NA, Paskhover B. Deep cheek fat volumes and midfacial aging. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(5):467–475. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz185.
  • Swift A, Liew S, Weinkle S, et al. The facial aging process from the “inside out.” Aesthet Surg J. 2021;41(10):1107–1119. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa339.
  • Zhang L, Tang MY, Jin R, et al. Classification of nasolabial folds in Asians and the corresponding surgical approaches: by Shanghai 9th People’s Hospital. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(7):914–919. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.03.023.
  • Kapoor KM, Saputra DI, Porter CE, et al. Treating aging changes of facial anatomical layers with hyaluronic acid fillers. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021;14:1105–1118. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S294812.
  • Kim JE, Sykes JM. Hyaluronic acid fillers: history and overview. Facial Plast Surg. 2011;27(6):523–528. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298785.
  • Stefura T, Kacprzyk A, Droś J, et al. Tissue fillers for the ­nasolabial fold area: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(5):2300–2316. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5.
  • American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. ASPS National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Procedural Statistics. 2018. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/DOCUMENTS/NEWS/STATISTICS/2018/PLASTIC-SURGERY-STATISTICS-FULL-REPORT-2018.PDF
  • Bukhari SNA, Roswandi NL, Waqas M, et al. Hyaluronic acid, a promising skin rejuvenating biomedicine: a review of recent updates and pre-clinical and clinical investigations on ­cosmetic and nutricosmetic effects. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;120(Pt B):1682–1695. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.188.
  • Kablik J, Monheit GD, Yu L, et al. Comparative physical properties of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(Supp 1):302–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.01046.x.
  • Qiao J, Li F, Jin HZ, et al. The efficacy and safety of Dermalax(TM) DEEP in the correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021;32(5):548–555. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1687814.
  • Li W, Li B, Hofmann M, et al. A multicenter noninferiority study comparing safety and effectiveness of hyaluronic acid fillers for correction of nasolabial folds in Chinese subjects. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11(2):e4810. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004810.
  • Baumann LS, Shamban AT, Lupo MP, et al. Comparison of smooth-gel hyaluronic acid dermal fillers with cross-linked bovine collagen: a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, within-subject study. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(Suppl 2):S128–S135. doi: 10.1097/00042728-200712001-00004.
  • Dover JS, Rubin MG, Bhatia AC. Review of the efficacy, durability, and safety data of two nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid fillers from a prospective, randomized, comparative, multicenter study. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(Suppl 1):322–331; discussion 30-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.01060.x.
  • Li D, Sun J, Wu S. A multi-center comparative efficacy and safety study of two different hyaluronic acid fillers for treatment of nasolabial folds in a Chinese population. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(3):755–761. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12916.
  • Narins RS, Brandt F, Leyden J, et al. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(6):588–595. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29150.x.
  • Huang Y, Zhang Y, Fei X, et al. Monophasic and biphasic ­hyaluronic acid fillers for esthetic correction of nasolabial folds: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022;46(3):1407–1422. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02729-y.
  • Suh JH, Oh CT, Im SI, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new monophasic hyaluronic acid filler with lidocaine 0.3% in the correction of nasolabial fold. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16(3):327–332. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12310.
  • Lee JH, Kim SH, Park ES. The efficacy and safety of HA IDF plus (with lidocaine) versus HA IDF (without lidocaine) in ­nasolabial folds injection: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, split-face study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41(2):422–428. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0769-8.
  • Micheels P, Besse S, Sarazin D, et al. Hyaluronic acid gel based on CPM(®) technology with and without lidocaine: is there a difference?. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(1):36–44. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12803.