References
- AND Festival. (2012). Abandon normal devices festival review, presented by Cornerhouse, Manchester: Cornerhouse.
- Arts Council England North West. (2012). “We Play” evaluation report. Retrieved from http://weplayevaluation.org/
- Belfiore, E. (2012). “Defensive instrumentalism” and the legacy of New Labour's cultural policies. Cultural Trends, 21(2), 103–111.
- Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2007). Determinants of impact: Towards a better understanding of encounters with the arts. Cultural Trends, 16(3), 225–275.
- Bergsgard, N. A., Jøsendal, K., & Garcia, B. (2010). A cultural mega event's impact on innovative capabilities in art production: The results of Stavanger being the European capital of culture in 2008. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 2(4), 353–371.
- Cooper, A. (2012). The drivers, impacts and value of CASE: A short history from the inside. Cultural Trends, 21(4), 281–289.
- Corkery, H. (2011). Lakes alive 2011 evaluation report, produced by Helen Corkery Research and Marketing, November 2011. Retrieved from http://www.streetsahead.org.uk/news/lakes-alive-evaluation-report-2010/
- Corkery, H. (2012). Lakes alive 2012 evaluation report, produced by Helen Corkery Research and Marketing, October 2012. Retrieved from http://www.streetsahead.org.uk/news/lakes-alive-evaluation-report-2010/
- Culture Northwest. (2008). “We Play” business plan for Legacy Trust. Unpublished report produced for the Legacy Trust UK.
- Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). (2002). The regional cultural data framework. London: Author.
- Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). (2004). DCMS evidence toolkit. Technical report. London: Author.
- Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). (2005). Olympic Games impact study final report, prepared by PriceWaterhouse Cooper, December 2005 London: Author.
- Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). (2012). Meta-evaluation of the impacts and legacy of the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games – Summary of Report 4: “Interim Evaluation”, November 2012. London: Author.
- Ganga, G. M. D., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2011). A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1), 177–187.
- Garcia, B. (2004). Urban regeneration, arts programming and major events Glasgow 1990, Sydney 2000 and Barcelona 2004. International journal of cultural policy, 10(1), 103–118.
- Garcia, B. (2012). The Olympic games and cultural policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Garcia, B. (2013). London 2012 Cultural Olympiad evaluation final report. Liverpool: Institute for Cultural Capital.
- Gilmore, A. (2004). Local cultural strategies: A strategic review. Cultural Trends, 13(3), 3–32.
- Gilmore, A. (2011). Counting eyeballs, soundbites and “plings”: Arts participation, strategic instrumentalism and the London 2012 Cultural Olympiad. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18(2), 151–167.
- Gilmore, A., & Lander, D. (2011, July 22). Defining, making and capturing legacy: Legacy Trust We Play Programme. Presentation to the regional London 2012, Kirkby Sports College, Knowsley, Liverpool.
- Gilmore, A., & Miles, A. (2010). “WE PLAY” evaluation framework and research strategy report. Manchester: Arts Council England North West.
- Holden, J. (2004). Capturing cultural value: How culture has become a tool of government policy. London: Demos.
- Inglis, D. (2008). Cultural agonistes: Social differentiation, cultural policy and Cultural Olympiads. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 14(4), 463–477.
- Jayne, M. (2005). Creative industries: The regional dimension? Environment and Planning C. Government and Policy, 23(4), 537–556.
- Kennell, J., & MacLeod, N. (2008, November 6–8). A memetic framework for the conceptualisation and evaluation of the Cultural Olympiad of the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Paper presented at the 2nd Bi-annual International Tourism Studies Association conference in Shanghai, China. Retrieved from http://gala.gre.ac.uk/3951/
- Kennell, J., & MacLeod, N. (2009). A grey literature review of the Cultural Olympiad. Cultural Trends, 18(1), 83–88.
- Law, J., Ruppert, E., & Savage, M. (2011). The double social life of methods. CRESC Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 95, Milton Keynes: CRESC, Open University.
- Low, D., & Hall, P. (2011). The 2010 Cultural Olympiad playing for the global or the stage? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18(2), 131–150.
- Lutz, J. (2006). Extending the cultural research infrastructure: The rise of the regional cultural consortiums in England. Cultural Trends, 15(1), 19–44.
- Miles, A. (2010). Lakes alive 2010 evaluation report. Retrieved from http://www.streetsahead.org.uk/news/lakes-alive-evaluation-report-2010/
- O'Brien, D. (2010a). Measuring the value of culture: A report to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
- O'Brien. D. (2010b). The culture and sport evidence programme: New forms of evidence and new questions for cultural policy. Cultural Trends, 21(4), 275–280.
- O'Brien, D. (2013). Cultural policy: Management, value and modernity in the creative industries. London: Routledge.
- Roberts, N., & King, P. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), 147–175.
- Stevens, A. (2011). Telling policy stories: An ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 40(2), 237–256.
- Stevenson, N. (2012). Culture and the 2012 Games: Creating a tourism legacy? Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 10(2), 37–149.