Carrying out research across the arts and humanities and social sciences: developing the methodology for Dementia and Imagination

References

• Aboelela, S., Larsen, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S., … Gebbie, K. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(1), 329–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Alzheimer’s Society. (2007). Dementia UK, summary of Key findings. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Alzheimer’s Society. (2012). Dementia 2012: A national challenge. Retrieved from http://alzheimers.org.uk/site/scripts/download_info.php?fileID=1389
   Google Scholar
• Arts and Humanities Research Council. (2011). Connected communities programme research development workshop on communities, cultures, health and well-being. Retrieved from http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cas/documents/events/cc8workshopcallforparticipants.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bakhshi, H., Schneider, P., & Walker, C. (2008). Arts and humanities research and innovation. Bristol: AHRC and NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, R. (2015). Visualising dementia activism: Using the arts to communicate qualitative research findings. Qualitative Research, 15(6), 755–768. doi: 10.1177/1468794114567493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard, R. L. (2011). Art therapies and dementia care: A systematic review. Dementia, 11(5), 633–656. doi:10.1177/1471301211421090
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2008). The social impact of the arts: An intellectual history. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D. (2010). Measuring the value of culture: A report to the Department for Culture Media and Sport. Retrieved from http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/measuring-the-value-culture-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology. The British Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 75–92. doi: 10.2307/590553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2009). A guide to social return on investment. Retrieved from https://bond.org.uk/data/files/Cabinet_office_A_guide_to_Social_Return_on_Investment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N., & Edwards, G. (2016). Cases, mechanisms, and the real: The theory and methodology of mixed-method social network analysis. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 13. doi:10.5153/sro.3920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, D., & Zechmeister, K. (1973). Conflict of interest and value dissensus: Propositions in the sociology of conflict. Human Relations, 26(4), 449–466. doi: 10.1177/001872677302600403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, L., Service, O., Goldacre, B., & Torgerson, D. (2012). Test, learn, adapt: Developing public policy with randomised controlled trails. London: Behavioural Insights Team. Cabinet Office. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/test-learn-adapt-developing-public-policy-with-randomised-controlled-trials
   Google Scholar
• Healy, S. (2003). Epistemological pluralism and the ‘politics of choice’. Futures, 35, 689–701. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00022-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2011a). The Green Book: Appraisal and evaluation in central government. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2011b). The Magenta Book: Guidance for evaluation. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, S. (2016). Bursting paradigms: A colour wheel of practice-research. Cultural Trends, 25(2), 74–86. doi: 10.1080/09548963.2016.1171511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: A literature review. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 35(2S), S116–S123. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 87–99. doi: 10.1080/00405849209543529
   Google Scholar
• Lele, S., & Norgaard, R. (2005). Practicing interdisciplinarity. Bioscience, 55(11), 967–975. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0967:PI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 1(1), 66–99. doi: 10.1177/0021943603259363
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, J., Clarke, A., Ingleton, C., & Repper, J. (2010). Actively involving people with dementia in qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(13–14), 1935–1943. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03136.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mental Health Foundation. (2011). An evidence review of the impact of participatory arts on older people. Retrieved from http://www.baringfoundation.org.uk/EvidenceReview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T., Baird, C., Littlefield, G., Kofinas, Chapin, F., & Redman, C. (2008). Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 46. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/unf_research/35/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A., Goulding, A., & Whitehead, C. (2013). How cultural capital, habitus and class influence the responses of older adults to the field of contemporary visual art. Poetics, 41(5), 456–480. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2013.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2004). Realist synthesis, an introduction. ESRC Research Methods Programme. Retrieved from http://betterevaluation.org/resources/guide/realist_synthesis_an_introduction
   Google Scholar
• Reavey, P. (2012). Visual methods in psychology. Using and interpreting images in qualitative research. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sibbald, B., & Roland, R. (1998). Understanding controlled trials: Why are randomised controlled trials important? British Medical Journal, 316, 201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7126.201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, H. (2013). Epistemological pluralism in research synthesis methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(7), 889–911. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2012.691565
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, E. (2011). Validity of scales. In M. Lovric (Ed.), International encyclopaedia of statistical science (pp. 1637–1639). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wildemuth, B. (1993). Post-positivist research: Two examples of methodological pluralism. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 63(4), 450–468. doi: 10.1086/602621
   Google Scholar
• Windle, G., Gregory, S., Newman, A., Goulding, A., O'Brien, D., & Parkinson, C. (2014). Understanding the impact of visual arts interventions for people living with dementia: A realist review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 3(1), 91. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-3-91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar