The park and the commons: vernacular spaces for everyday participation and cultural value

References

• CABE Space. (2010). Urban Green nation: Building the evidence base. London: CABE.
   Google Scholar
• CLG. (2016). Communities and local government committee public parks inquiry. Retrieved from https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/communities-and-local-government-committee/inquiries/parliament-2015/public-parks-16-17/
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, K. (2016). The Mancunian breakthrough. In The Fabian Society (Eds.), Green places (pp. 12–14). London: Fabian Society.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (2015, May). Ethnography report for Manchester-Salford Cultural Ecosystem, unpublished research report for Understanding Everyday Participation.
   Google Scholar
• Gidwani, V., & Baviskar, A. (2011, December 10). Urban commons review of urban affairs: Economic & political weekly, Volume XLVI No. 50. Retrieved from http://www.epw.in/journal/2011/50/review-urban-affairs-review-issues-specials/urban-commons.html
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, A., & Doyle, P. (in press). Histories of public parks in Manchester and Salford and their role in cultural policies for everyday participation. In E. Belfiore & L. Gibson (Eds.), Culture and power: Histories of participation, values and governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Greenspace. (2011). Understanding the contribution parks and green spaces can make to improving people’s lives Retrieved from http://greenflagaward.org/media/51265/green_space.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heritage Lottery Fund. (2014). The state of UK parks 2014: Renaissance to risk? London: Heritage Lottery Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage Lottery Fund. (2016a). State of the UK public parks. London: Heritage Lottery Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage Lottery Fund. (2016b). State of the UK public parks research report. London: Heritage Lottery Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage Lottery Fund. (2016c). State of the UK public parks II: Public survey, Report prepared by Britain Thinks. London: Heritage Lottery Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Howkins, A. (2011). The commons, enclosure and radical histories. In D. Feldman & J. Lawrence (Eds.), Structures and transformations in modern British history (pp. 118–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keshavarz, N. (2013). Muslim perspective on neighbourhood park use in Birmingham City, United Kingdom and Aachen City, Germany (Doctoral thesis). Submitted to the Faculty of Spatial Planning Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, L. (in press). Materializing the intangible through civic participation in Cheetham commons. In C. Lewis, & J. Symons (Eds.), Realizing the city: Ethnographic narratives of the Manchester city region. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, P. (2009). The magna carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, P. (2014). Stop thief! The commons, enclosures and resistance. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S., Taplin, D., & S. Scheld. (2005). Rethinking urban parks, public space and cultural diversity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manchester City Council. (2012). Cheetham ward plan 2012–2014. Manchester: Manchester City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Manchester City Council. (2013). 2011 Census ward level analysis, research and performance report. Retrieved from http://www.manchester.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/21207/q05p_2011_census_ward_overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Manchester City Council. (2016, February 23). Update on parks strategy: Report to neighbourhood scrutiny committee. Manchester: Manchester City Council.
   Google Scholar
• MIER. (2008). Manchester independent economic review economic baseline study; UK archives. Retrieved from http://www.manchester-review.org.uk/project_720.html
   Google Scholar
• Miles, A. (2016). Telling tales of participation: Exploring the interplay of time and territory in cultural boundary work using participation narratives. Cultural Trends, 5, 182–193. doi:10.1080/09548963.2016.1204046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, A., & Gibson, L. (2016). Everyday participation and cultural value. Cultural Trends, 5(3), 151–157. doi:10.1080/09548963.2016.1204043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, P. (2013, November). Rethinking parks. London: Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• Nesta. (2016, February). Learning to rethink parks. London: Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• ONS. (2013). Area: Broughton Ward. Religion, 2011 KS209EW [data set] Retrieved November 30, 2016 www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osuh, C. (2015, March 26) Cheetham Hill gang behind £2 m drugs conspiracy given prison sentences totalling more than half a century, Manchester Evening News. Retrieved from www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M., Bagnall, G., & Longhurst, B. (2005). Globalisation and belonging. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerhout, J. (2016, January 9). Cheetham Hill named the counterfeit capital of the UK, Manchester Evening New. Retrieved from www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. J., Tuffin, M., Taplin, R. H., Moore, S. A., & Tonge, J. (2014). Visitor segmentation for a park system using research and managerial judgement. Journal of Ecotourism, 13(2-3), 93–109. doi:10.1080/14724049.2014.96311
   Google Scholar
• Taplin, D., Scheld, S., & Low, S. (2002). Rapid ethnographic assessment in urban parks: A case study of independence national historical park. Human Organization, 61.1(Spring), 80–93. doi:10.17730/humo.61.1.6ayvl8t0aekf8vmy
   Google Scholar
• Ward, D. (2014). The commons in history: Culture, conflict, and ecology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar