216
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Understanding the digital legacy of the World War I: Cymru1914

ORCID Icon

References

  • Anderson, I. G. (2007). Pure dead brilliant? Evaluating The Glasgow Story digitisation project. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 41 (4), 365–385. doi: 10.1108/00330330710831585
  • Brophy, P., & Woodhouse, S. (2002). Evaluation and impact assessment for NOF digitise projects. An information paper from the NOF Technical Advisory Service., NOF-digitise Technical Advisory Service. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/nof/support/help/papers/impact-assessment/
  • Clark, K., & Maeer, G. (2008). The cultural value of heritage: Evidence from the heritage lottery fund. Cultural Trends, 17 (1), 23–56. doi: 10.1080/09548960801920302
  • Education for Change. (2006). The Fund’s ICT Content Programmes: Final Evaluation Report. Big Lottery Fund. http://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/er_eval_ict_final_rep.pdf
  • Evidence Base. (2007). Evaluation of the JISC Digitisation Programme Phase 1 and International Contextualisation. Bristol: JISC.
  • Gilmore, A., Glow, H., & Johanson, K. (2017). Accounting for quality: Arts evaluation, public value and the case of “culture counts”. Cultural Trends, 26, 282–294. doi: 10.1080/09548963.2017.1382761
  • HEFCE. (2015). The Nature, Scale and Beneficiaries of Research Impact: An initial analysis of Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2014 impact case studies. Research Report 2015/01, King’s College London and Digital Science.
  • Hughes, L. M. (2012). Evaluating and Measuring the Value, Use and Impact of Digital Collections. London: Facet.
  • Knell, J. (2014). Manchester Metrics Pilot Final Report of Stage One. Manchester: Arts Council England. http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/publication/manchester-metrics-pilot
  • Lopatin, L. (2006). Library digitization projects, issues and guidelines. Library Hi Tech, 24(2), 273–289. doi: 10.1108/07378830610669637
  • RF Associates. (2017). Heritage Grants: A Review of the Self-Evaluations and Outcomes of 200 completed projects funded during Strategic Plan 3. Final Report. London: Heritage Lottery Fund.
  • Ross, S., Anderson, I., Duffy, C., Economou, M., Gow, A., McKinney, P., & Sharp, R. (2002). The NINCH Guide to Good Practice in the Digital Representation and Management of Cultural Heritage Materials. Washington, DC: National Initiative for a Networked Cultural Heritage.
  • Scott, J. (2016). Tracing Your British and Irish Ancestors: A Guide for Family Historians. Barnsley: Pen & Sword.
  • Selwood, S. (2016). Response. Cultural Trends, 25, 69–71. doi: 10.1080/09548963.2015.1134043
  • Shipley, R., Reeve, A., Walker, S., Grover, P., & Goodey, B. (2004). Townscape heritage initiatives evaluation: Methodology for assessing the effectiveness of heritage lottery fund projects in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 22 (4), 523–542. doi: 10.1068/c34m
  • Tanner, S. G. (2012). Measuring the impact of digital resources: The Balanced Value Impact Model. King’s College London. www.kdcs.kcl.ac.uk/innovation/impact.html
  • Tanner, S. G. (2016). Using impact as a strategic tool for developing the digital library. Library Leadership and Management, 30(4).
  • Tanner, S. G. (2017). The Balanced Value Impact Model Version 2 overview graphics in full resolution. Digital or Visual Products, King’s College London. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/80251677/BVI_Model_Version2_graphics_by_Simon_Tanner.zip
  • Tanner, S. G., & Deegan, M. (2011). Inspiring Research, Inspiring Scholarship: The Value and Benefits of Digitized Resources for Learning, Teaching, Research and Enjoyment (pp. 8–9). London: HEFCE.
  • Terras, M. (2008). Digital Images for the Information Professional. London: Ashgate.
  • Tessler, A. (2013). Economic Valuation of the British Library. Oxford: Oxford Economics.
  • Warwick, C., Terras, M., Huntington, P., Pappa, N., & Galina, I. (2006). LAIRAH Project: Log Analysis of Internet Resources in the Arts and Humanities. Final Report to the Arts and Humanities Research Council. University College London.
  • Welsh Government, National Survey for Wales. (2013–15). Welsh Language Use Survey.
  • Woodhouse, S. (2001). The people’s network and the learning revolution: Building the NOF digitise programme. Ariadne, 29.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.