Unknown pleasures: techniques of taste in the algorithmic recommendation of unfamiliar art music

References

• Anderson, A., Maystre, L., Mehrotra, R., Anderson, I., Lalmas, M. (2020). Algorithmic effects on the diversity of consumption on spotify. Proceedings of the Web Conference, 2020, 2155–2165. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380281
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T., Emmison, M., & Frow, J. (1999). Accounting for tastes: Australian everyday cultures. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, B. (1996). "Anything but heavy metal": Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 884–899. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2020). Distances in the field: Mapping similarity and familiarity in the production, curation and consumption of australian art music. Western Sydney University.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2023a). The curation of music discovery: The presentation of unfamiliar classical music on radio: Digital playlists and concert programmes. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 41(1), 304–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374221128729
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2023b). ‘You don’t go to these concerts for fun’: The fluid and emergent performance of taste in contemporary art music. Cultural Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755221129764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrêa, D. C., & Rodrigues, F. A. (2016). A survey on symbolic data-based music genre classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 60, 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2015). Music worlds and body techniques: On the embodiment of musicking. Cultural Sociology, 9(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975515576585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daenekindt, S., & Roose, H. (2014). Ways of preferring: Distinction through the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of cultural consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514553715
   Google Scholar
• DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerger, G., Leder, H., & Kremer, A. (2014). Context effects on emotional and aesthetic evaluations of artworks and IAPS pictures. Acta Psychologica, 151, 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glitsos, L. (2019). Somatechnics and popular music in digital contexts. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Hampshire Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, N. W. (2018). Hearing the contradictions: Aesthetic experience, music and digitization. Cultural Sociology, 12(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975518776517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennion, A. (2005). Pragmatics of taste. In M. D. Jacobs & N. W. Hanrahan (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to the sociology of culture (pp. 131–144). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hennion, A. (2012). Music and Mediation: Toward a new sociology of music. In M. Clayton, T. Herbert, & R. Middleton (Eds.), The cultural study of music: A critical introduction (2nd ed, pp. 249–260). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hennion, A. (2015). The passion for music: A sociology of mediation. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, D. (2022). Streaming’s effects on music culture: Old anxieties and new simplifications. Cultural Sociology, 16(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755211019974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgado–Tello, F. P., Chacón–Moscoso, S., Barbero–García, I., Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, L. G., Jr, M., & G, R. (1975). An Investigation of the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1002_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, F. L., & McMillan, J. (2001). Scoring occupational categories for social research: A review of current practice with Australian examples. Work, Employment and Society, 15(3), 539–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170122119147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juslin, P. N. (2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: Towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Physics of Life Reviews, 10(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, J. W. (2011). Doing things with music. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9152-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembo, A. (2017). Three chords & [somebody’s] truth: Trajectories of experience and taste among hard country fans. Poetics, 60, 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and Meaning in Music. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J. (2017). Highbrow culture for high-potentials? Cultural orientations of a Business elite in the making. Poetics, 61, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. W. (2015). Curation by code: Infomediaries and the data mining of taste. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, A. C., & Hargreaves, D. J. (2008). The social and applied psychology of music. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, R. (2016). When is a discovery? The affective dimensions of discovery in music consumption. Popular Communication, 14(3), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2016.1193182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollivier, M. (2008). Modes of openness to cultural diversity: Humanist, populist, practical, and indifferent. Poetics, 36(2), 120–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermino, C. L. (2014). Forgotify plays Spotify’s 4 million unheard songs. Retrieved 25 May 2016, from http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/digital-and-mobile/5901260/forgotify-plays-spotifys-4-million-unheard-songs
   Google Scholar
• Pelly, L. (2018). Discover weakly: Sexism on spotify. The Baffler.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A. (1992). Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics, 21(4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(92)90008-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robette, N., & Roueff, O. (2014). An eclectic eclecticism: Methodological and theoretical issues about the quantification of cultural omnivorism. Poetics, 47, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S., Miles, A. (2013). A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC’s great British class survey experiment. Sociology, 47(2), 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513481128
   Google Scholar
• Savage, P. E., & Brown, S. (2020). Toward a new comparative musicology. Analytical Approaches To World Music, 2(2), 148–197.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., & Dean, R. T. (2019). Encouraging attention and exploration in a hybrid recommender system for libraries of unfamiliar music. Music & Science, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204319893179
   Google Scholar
• Varriale, S. (2016). Beyond distinction: Theorising cultural evaluation as a social encounter. Cultural Sociology, 10(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975515596447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witvliet, C. V. O., & Vrana, S. R. (2007). Play it again Sam: Repeated exposure to emotionally evocative music polarises liking and smiling responses, and influences other affective reports: Facial EMG, and heart rate. Cognition & Emotion, 21(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930601000672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar