Artists portray human faces with the Fourier statistics of complex natural scenes

References

• Adorno TW. Ästhetische Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt 1970
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth RG, Bartlett MS, Dobkins KR. Image statistics of American sign language: Comparison with faces and natural scenes. J Opt Soc Amer A - Opt, Image Sci Vision 2006; 23: 2085–2096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke E. A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. Dodsley, London 1757
   Google Scholar
• Burton GJ, Moorhead IR. Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. Appl Phys 1987; 26: 157–170
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh P. The artist as neuroscientist. Nature 2005; 434: 301–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field DJ. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Amer A - Opt Image Sci Vision 1987; 4: 2379–2394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georghiades AS, Belhumeur PN, Kriegman DJ. From few to many: Illumination cone models for face recognition under variable lighting and pose. IEEE T Pattern Anal 2001; 23: 643–660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham DJ, Field DJ. 2007. Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: Spectra, sparseness and nonlinearities. Spatial Vision (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Gregory RL, Harris J, Heard P, Rose D. The artful eye. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995
   Google Scholar
• Hagerhall CM, Purcell T, Taylor R. Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. J Environ Psychol 2004; 24: 247–255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hateren JH, van der Schaaf A. Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc R Soc B 1998; 265: 359–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer PO, Hyvärinen A. Sparse coding of natural contours. Neurocomputing 2002; 44–46: 459–466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume D. Of the standard of taste. The philosophical works of David Hume. Longman, Green, London 1757
   Google Scholar
• Kandinsky W. Über das Geistige in der Kunst, insbesondere in der Malerei. Piper, München 1912
   Google Scholar
• Kant I. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Werkausgabe in zwölf Bänden (1992), W Weischedel. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt 1790
   Google Scholar
• Lee AB, Mumford D, Huang J. Occlusion models for natural images: A statistical study of a scale-invariant dead leaves model. Int J Comput Vis 2001; 41: 35–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone MS. Vision and art: The biology of seeing. Harry N. Abrams, New York 2002
   Google Scholar
• Martinez AM, Benavente R. 1998. The AR Face Database. CVC Technical Report, Vol. # 24.
   Google Scholar
• Olshausen BA, Field DJ. Natural image statistics and efficient coding. Network Comp Neural 1996; 7: 333–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshausen BA, Field DJ. Vision and the coding of natural images. Am Sci 2000; 88: 238–245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshausen BA, Field DJ. Sparse coding of sensory inputs. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004; 14: 481–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parraga CA, Troscianko T, Tolhurst DJ. The human visual system is optimised for processing the spatial information in natural visual images. Curr Biol 2000; 10: 35–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul G. Philosophical theories of beauty and scientific research on the brain. Beauty and the brain. Biological aspects of aesthetics, I Rentschler, B Herzberger, D Epstein. Birkhäuser, Basel 1988; 15–27
   Google Scholar
• Redies C. 2008. A universal model of esthetic perception based on the sensory coding of natural stimuli. Spatial Vision (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Redies C, Hasenstein J, Denzler J. 2007. Fractal-like image statistics in visual art: Similarity to natural scenes. Spatial Vision (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Rentschler I, Caelli T, Maffei L. Focusing in on art. Beauty and the brain, I Rentschler, B Herzberger, D Epstein. Birkhäuser, Basel 1988; 181–216
   Google Scholar
• Ruderman DL. Origins of scaling in natural images. Vision Res 1997; 37: 3385–3398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruderman DL, Bialek W. Statistics of natural images - scaling in the woods. Phys Rev Lett 1994; 73: 814–817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling FWJ. Philosophie der Kunst. Schellings Werke3rd, M Schröter. München, Beck 1907, (Reprint 1959)
   Google Scholar
• Simoncelli EP, Olshausen BA. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001; 24: 1193–1216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RP. Order in Pollack's chaos - Computer analysis is helping to explain the appeal of Jackson Pollock's paintings. Sci Am 2002; 287: 116–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RP, Micolich AP, Jonas D. Fractal analysis of Pollock's drip paintings. Nature 1999; 399: 422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolhurst DJ, Tadmor Y, Chao T. Amplitude spectra of natural images. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1992; 12: 229–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torralba A, Oliva A. Statistics of natural image categories. Network 2003; 14: 391–412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinje WE, Gallant JL. Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science 2000; 287: 1273–1276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner JS, Ratliff F. Some origins of the lightness and darkness of colors in the visual arts and in the brain. Techne 1999; 9–10: 61–73
   Google Scholar
• Zeki S. Art and the brain. J Consciousness Stud 1999; 6–7: 76–96
   Google Scholar