Hebbian learning in a model with dynamic rate-coded neurons: An alternative to the generative model approach for learning receptive fields from natural scenes

References

• Atick JJ, Redlich A. Towards a theory of early visual processing. Neural Comput 1990; 2: 308–320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong KM, Fitzgerald JK, Moore T. Changes in visual receptive fields with microstimulation of frontal cortex. Neuron 2006; 50: 791–798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow HB. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. Sensory communication, WA Rosenblith. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1961; 217–234
   Google Scholar
• Barlow HB. Redundancy reduction revisited. Network 1998; 12: 241–253
   Google Scholar
• Bayerl P, Neumann H. Disambiguating visual motion through contextual feedback modulation. Neural Comput 2004; 16: 2041–2066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ. The ‘independent components’ of natural scenes are edge filters. Vis Res 1997; 37: 3327–3338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullier J, Hupe JM, James AC, Girard P. The role of feedback connections in shaping the responses of visual cortical neurons. Prog Brain Res 2001; 134: 193–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David SV, Vinje WE, Gallant JL. Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 6991–7006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhorn R, Reitboeck E, Arndt M, Dicke P. Feature linking via synchronisation among distributed assemblies: Simulations of results from Cat Visual Cortex. Neural Comput 1990; 2: 293–307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconbridge MS, Stamps RL, Badcock DR. A simple Hebbian/anti-Hebbian network learns the sparse, independent components of natural images. Neural Comput 2006; 18: 415–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossberg S. How does the brain build a cognitive code?. Psychol Rev 1980; 87: 1–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamker FH. A dynamic model of how feature cues guide spatial attention. Vision Res 2004; 44: 501–521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamker FH. The reentry hypothesis: The putative interaction of the frontal eye field, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and areas V4, IT for attention and eye movement. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15: 431–447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamker FH. Modeling feature-based attention as an active top-down inference process. BioSystems 2006; 86: 91–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamker FH. The mechanisms of feature inheritance as predicted by a systems-level model of visual attention and decision making. Adv Cogn Psychol 2007; 3: 111–123
   Google Scholar
• Hancock PJB, Baddeley RJ, Smith LS. The principle components of natural images. Network 1992; 3: 61–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpur G, Prager R. Development of low entropy coding in a recurrent network. Network: Comput Neural Syst 1996; 7: 277–284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer PO. Modeling receptive fields with non-negative sparse coding. Neurocomputing 2003; 52–54: 547–552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer PO. Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints. J Mach Learn Res 2004; 5: 1457–1469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer PO, Hyvärinen A. A multi-layer sparse coding network learns contour coding from natural images. Vision Res 2002; 42: 1593–1605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehee JF, Rothkopf C, Beck JM, Ballard DH. Learning receptive fields using predictive feedback. J Physiol Paris 2006; 100: 125–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karklin Y, Lewicki MS. Learning higher-order structures in natural images. Network 2003; 14: 483–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammé VAF, Roelfsema PR. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trend Neurosci 2000; 23: 571–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DD, Seung HS. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 1999; 401: 788–791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Atick JJ. Towards a theory of striate cortex. Neural Comput 1994; 6: 127–146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsker R. From basic network principles to neural architecture: Emergence of orientation-selective cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83: 8390–8394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadal J-P, Parga N. Nonlinear neurons in the low-noise limit: A factorial code maximizes information transfer. Network: Comput Neural Sys 1994; 5: 565–581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor DH, Fukui MM, Pinsk MA, Kastner S. Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 1203–1209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oja E. A simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer. J Math Biol 1982; 15: 267–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshausen BA, Field DJ. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 1996; 381: 607–609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshausen BA, Field DJ. Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1?. Vision Res 1997; 37: 3311–3325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao RP, Ballard DH. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2: 79–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehn M, Sommer FT. A network that uses few active neurones to code visual input predicts the diverse shapes of cortical receptive fields. J Comput Neurosci 2007; 22: 135–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds JH, Chelazzi L. Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 2004; 27: 611–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringach DL. Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 2002; 88: 455–463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockland KS, van Hoesen GW. Direct temporal-occipital feedback connections to striate cortex (V1) in the macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex 1994; 4: 300–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockland KS, Saleem KS, Tanaka K. Divergent feedback connections from areas V4 and TEO in the macaque. Visual Neurosci 1994; 11: 579–600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sejnowski T. Storing covariance with nonlinearly interacting neurons. J Math Biol 1977; 4: 303–321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoncelli EP. Vision and the statistics of the visual environment. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003; 13: 144–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer MA, Wurtz RH. What the brain stem tells the frontal cortex. I. Oculomotor signals sent from superior colliculus to frontal eye field via mediodorsal thalamus. J Neurophysiol 2004; 91: 1381–1402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratling MW, Johnson MH. Pre-integration lateral inhibition enhances unsupervised learning. Neural Comput 2002; 14: 2157–2179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turrigiano GG, Nelson SB. Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5: 97–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hateren JH, van der Schaaf A. Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc Biol Sci 1998; 265: 359–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Marlsburg C. Self-organization of orientation selective cells in the striate cortex. Kybernetic 1973; 14: 85–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willshaw DJ, Dayan P. Optimal plasticity in matrix memories: What goes up must come down. Neural Comput 1990; 2: 85–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltschut J, Zirnsak M, Hamker FH. (in preparation) Hebbian learning of feedforward and feedback connections in dynamic rate coded neurons.
   Google Scholar
• Yu A, Giese MA, Poggio T. Biophysiologically plausible implementations of the maximum operation. Neural Comput 2002; 14: 2857–2881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar