Evaluation of lesion clustering in irradiated plasmid DNA

References

• Ayene IS, Koch CJ, Krisch RE, 1995. Role of scavenger-derived radicals in the induction of double-strand and single-strand breaks in irradiated DNA. Radiation Research 142: 133–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashkirov V, Schulte RW, 2002. Dosimetry system for the irradiation of thin biological samples with therapeutic proton beams. Physics in Medicine and Biology 47: 409–420.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belli M, Cherubini R, Finotto S, Moschini G, Sapora 0, Simone G, Tabocchini MA, 1989. RBE-LET relationship for the survival of V79 cells irradiated with low energy protons. International Journal of Radiation Biology 55: 93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belli M, Goodhead DT, Ianzini F, Simone G, Tabocchini MA, 1992. Direct comparison of biological effectiveness of protons and alpha-particles of the same LET. II. Mutation induction at the HPRT locus in V79 cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 61: 625— 629.
   Google Scholar
• Belli M, Ianzini F, Sapora 0, Tabocchini MA, Cera F, Cherubini R, Hague AM, Moschini G, Tiveron P, Simone G, 1996. DNA double strand break production and rejoining in V79 cells irradiated with light ions. Advances in Space Research 18: 73–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belli M, Cherubini R, Dalla Vecchia M, Dini V, Esposito G, Moschini G, Sapora 0, Simone G, Tabocchini MA, 2002. DNA fragmentation in V79 cells irradiated with light ions as measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. I. Experimental results. International Journal of Radiation Biology 78: 475–482.
   Google Scholar
• Berger MJ, 1995. ESTAR, PSTAR and ASTAR: Computer programs for calculating stopping powers and ranges for electrons, protons and helium ions. In: IAEA TECDOC 799: Atomic and molecular data for radiotherapy and radiation research. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. pp. 723–740.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt PH, Friedland W, Meckbach R, Jacob P, Paretzke HG, 2002. Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage by low LET radiation using inhomogeneous higher order DNA targets. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 99: 203–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaisdell JO, Harrison L, Wallace SS, 2001. Base excision repair processing of radiation-induced clustered DNA lesions. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 97: 25–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman JD, Reuvers AP, Borsa J, Greenstock CL, 1973. Chemical radioprotection and radiosensitization of mammalian cells growing in vitro. Radiation Research 56: 291–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CZ, Watt DE, 1986. Biophysical mechanism of radiation damage to mammalian cells by X-and y-rays. International Journal of Radiation Biology 49: 131–142.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen RC, Tobias CA, Taylor WD, 1972. Heavy-ion-induced single-and double-strand breaks in WX-174 replica-five form DNA. International Journal of Radiation Biology and related studies in Physics, chemistry and Medicine 22: 457–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan R, Collis CM, Grigg GW, 1987. Breakage of double-stranded DNA due to single-stranded nicking. Journal of Theoretical Biology 127: 229–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianov GL, Timchenko TV, Sinitsina DI, Kuzminov AV, Medvedev OA, Salganik RI, 1991. Repair of uracil residues closely spaced on the opposite strands of plasmid DNA results in double-strand break and deletion formation. Molecular and General Genetics 225: 448–452.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D'Souza DI, Harrison L, 2003. Repair of clustered uracil DNA damage in Escherichia Cali. Nucleic Acids Research 31: 4573–4581.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Folkard M, Prise KM, Vojnovic B, Davies S, Roper MJ, Michael BD, 1989. The irradiation of V79 mammalian cells by protons with energies below 2 MeV. Part I: Experimental arrangement and measurements of cell survival. International Journal of Radiation Biology 56: 221–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkard M, Prise KM, Vojnovic B, Newman HC, Roper MJ, Michael BD, 1996. Inactivation of V79 cells by low-energy protons, deuterons and helium-3 ions. International Journal of Radiation Biology 69: 729–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland W, Bernhardt P, Jacob P, Paretzke HG, Dingfelder M, 2002. Simulation of DNA damage after proton and low LET irradiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 99: 99–102.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland W, Jacob P, Bernhardt P, Paretzke HG, Dingfelder M, 2003. Simulation of DNA damage after proton irradiation. Radiation Research 159: 401–410.
   Google Scholar
• Garty G, Shchemelinin S, Breskin A, Chechik R, Assaf G, Orion I, Bashkirov V, Schulte R, Grosswendt B, 2002. The perfor-mance of a novel ion-counting nanodosimeter. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 492: 212–235.
   Google Scholar
• Garty G, 2004. Development of ion-counting nanodosimetry and evaluation of its relevance to radiation biology, Ph.D. Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhead DT, Belli M, Mill AJ, Bance DA, Allen LA, Hall SC, Ianzani F, Simone G, Stevens DL, Stretch A, 1992. Direct comparison between protons and alpha-particles of the same LET: I. Irradiation methods and inactivation of asynchronous V79, HeLa and C3H 10T1/2 cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 61: 611–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosswendt B, 2003. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Gulston M, Fulford J, Jenner T, Delara C, O'Neill P, 2002. Clustered DNA damage induced by c radiation in human fibroblasts (HF19), hamster (V79-4) cells and plasmid DNA is revealed as Fpg and Nth sensitive sites. Nucleic Acids Research 30: 3464–3472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanai R, Yazu M, Hieda K, 1998. On the experimental distinction between ssbs and dsbs in circular DNA. International Journal of Radiation Biology 73: 475–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRU 1998, Clinical proton dosimetry part I, Beam production, beam delivery and measurement of absorbed dose. ICRU 59. Bethesda: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. pp. 18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jenner TJ, Belli M, Goodhead DT, Ianzini F, Simone G, Tabocchini MA, 1992. Direct comparison of biological effectiveness of protons and alpha-particles of the same LET. III. Initial yield of DNA double-strand breaks in V79 cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 61: 631–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GDD, Milligan JR, Ward JF, Calabro-Jones PM, Aguilera JA, 1993. Yield of strand breaks as a function of scavenger concentration and LET for SV40 irradiated with 4He ions. Radiation Research 136: 190–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GDD, Boswell TV, Ward JF, 1994. Effects of postirradiation temperature on the yields of radiation-induced single-and double-strand breakage in SV40 DNA. Radiation Research 138: 291–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimczak U, Ludwig DC, Mark F, Rettberg P, Schulte-Frohlinde D, 1993. Irradiation of plasmid and phage DNA in water-alcohol mixtures: strand breaks and lethal damage as a function of scavenger concentration. International Journal of Radiation Biology 64: 497–510.
   Google Scholar
• Krisch RE, Flick MB, Trumbore CN, 1991. Radiation chemical mechanisms of single-and double-strand break formation in irradiated 5V40 DNA. Radiation Research 126: 251–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laverne JA, 1989. The production of OH radicals in the radiolysis of water with 4He ions. Radiation Research 118: 201–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutze LH, Winegar RA, 1990. pHAZE: a shuttle vector system for the detection and analysis of ionizing radiation-induced mutations. Mutation Research 245: 305–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyubchenko YL, Shlyakhtenko LS, 1997. Visualization of super-coiled DNA with atomic force microscopy in situ. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94: 496–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt D, 1963. An Algorithm for Least Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathe-matics 11: 431–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan JR, Aguilera JA, Ward JF, 1993. Variation of single-strand break yield with scavenger concentration for plasmid DNA irradiated in aqueous solution. Radiation Research 133: 151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan JR and Ward JF, 1994. Yield of single-strand breaks due to attack on DNA by scavenger-derived radicals. Radiation Research 137: 295–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan JR, Ng JY-Y, Wu CCL, Aguilera JA, Ward JF, Kow YW, Wallace SS, Cunningham RP, 1996a. Methylperoxyl radicals as intermediates in the damage to DNA irradiated in aqueous dimethyl sulfoxide with gamma rays. Radiation Research 146: 436–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan JR, Aguilera JA, Wu CCL, Ng JY-Y, Ward JF, 1996b. The difference that linear energy transfer makes to precursors of DNA strand breaks. Radiation Research 145: 442–448.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milligan JR, Aguilera JA, Nguyen T-TD, Paglinawan RA, Ward JF, 2000. DNA strand-break yields after post-irradiation incubation with base excision repair endonucleases implicate hydroxyl radical pairs in double-strand break formation. International Journal of Radiation Biology 76: 1475–1483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan JR, Aguilera JA, Paglinawan RA, Ward JF, Limoli CL, 2001. DNA strand break yields after post-high LET irradiation incubation with endonuclease-III and evidence for hydroxyl radical clustering. International Journal of Radiation Biology 77: 155–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo H, O'Neill P, Terrissol M, Goodhead DT, 1999. Quantitative modeling of DNA damage using Monte Carlo track structure method. Radiation and Environmental Biophy-sics 38: 31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo H, O'Neill P, Wilson WE, Goodhead DT, 2001. Computational approach for determining the spectrum of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Radiation Research 156: 577–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo H, Bolton CE, Watanabe R, Terrissol M, O'Neill P, Goodhead DT, 2002a. Modeling of DNA damage induced by energetic electrons (100 eV to 100 keV). Radiation Protection Dosimetry 99: 77–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo H, Goorley T, Fulford J, Takakura K, Ito T, 2002b. Quantitative analysis of the energetics of DNA damage. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 99: 91–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Neill P, Cunniffe SMT, Stevens DL, Botchway SW, Nikjoo H, 1997. Strand break induction in DNA by aluminium K ultrasoft X-rays: comparison of experimental data and track structure analysis. In: Goodhead, D., O'Neill, P. and Menzel, H. (Eds), Microdosimetry An Interdisciplinary approach. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry. pp. 81–84.
   Google Scholar
• Paretzke HG, 1987. Radiation track structure theory. In: Kase KR, Bjarngaard BE, Attix FH, editors. The Dosimetry of Ionizing Radiation. Vol. II. Orlando: Academic Press. pp. 89–170.
   Google Scholar
• Pastwa E, Neumann RD, Mezhevaya K, Winters TA, 2003. Repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks is dependent upon radiation quality and the structural complexity of double-strand breaks. Radiation Research 159: 251–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prise KM, Ahnstrom G, Belli M, Carlsson J, Frankenberg D, Kiefer J, Lobrich M, Michael BD, Nygren J, Simone G, Stenerlöw B, 1998. A review of dsb induction data for varying quality radiations. International Journal of Radiation Biology 74: 173–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prise KM, Pullar CH, Michael BD, 1999. A study of endonuclease III-sensitive sites in irradiated DNA: detection of alpha-particle-induced oxidative damage. Carcinogenesis 20: 905–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prise KM, Pinto M, Newman HC, Michael BD, 2001. A review of studies of ionizing radiation-induced double-strand break clustering. Radiation Research 156: 572–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roots R, Holley W, Chatterjee A, Irizarry M, Kraft G, 1990. The formation of strand breaks in DNA after high-LET irradiation: a comparison of data from in vitro and cellular systems. International Journal of Radiation Biology 58: 55–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydberg B, 2001. Radiation-induced DNA damage and chroma-tin structure. Acta Oncologica 40: 682–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shchemelinin S, Breskin A, Chechik R, Pansky A, Colautti P, Conte V, De Nardo L, Tornielli G, 1996. Ionization measurements in small gas samples by single ion counting. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 368: 859–861.
   Google Scholar
• Spinks JWT, Woods RJ, 1976. An introduction to radiation chemistry, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley. p. 93.
   Google Scholar
• Strike P, Humphreys GO, Roberts RJ, 1979. Nature of transform-ing deoxyribonucleic acid in calcium-treated Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology 138: 1033–1035.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutherland BM, Bennett PV, Schenk H, Sidorkina 0, Laval J, Trunk J, Monteleone D, Sutherland J, 2001. Clustered DNA damages induced by high and low LET radiation, including heavy ions. Physica Medica 17\(Supplement 1): 202–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taucher-Scholz G, Stanton JA, Schneider M, Kraft G, 1992. Induction of DNA breaks in SV40 by heavy ions. Advances in Space Research 12: (2)73- (2)80.
   Google Scholar
• Taucher-Scholz G, Kraft G, 1999. Influence of radiation quality on the yield of DNA strand breaks in 5V40 DNA irradiated in solution. Radiation Research 151: 595–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventur Y, Schulte-Frohlinde D, 1993. Does the enzymatic conversion of DNA single-strand damage into double-strand breaks contribute to biological inactivation of c-irradiated plasmid DNA? International Journal of Radiation Biology 63: 167–171.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace SS, 1998. Enzymatic processing of radiation-induced free radical damage in DNA. Radiation Research 150(supplement): S60–S79.
   Google Scholar
• Ward JF, 1988. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology 35: 95–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe R, Saito K, 2002. Monte Carlo simulation of strand-break induction on plasmid DNA in aqueous solution by monoenergetic electrons. Radiation and Environmental Bio-physics 41: 207–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar