Evaluation of radioadaptive response induced in CHO-K1 cells in a non-traditional model

References

• Au W W. Monitoring human populations for effect of radiation and chemical exposure using cytogenetic techniques. Occupational Medical 1991; 4: 597–611
   Google Scholar
• Azzam E, De Toledo S, Gooding T, Little J. Intercellular communication is involved in the bystander regulation of gene expression in human cells exposed to very low fluences of alpha particles. Radiation Research 1998; 152: 552–557
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan S, Rao S B. Cytogenetic analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes of occupational workers exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research 1999; 442: 37–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballarini F, Biaggi M, Otolenghi A, Sapora O. Cellular communication and bystander effects: A critical review for modeling low-dose radiation action. Mutation Research 2002; 501: 1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barquinero J F, Barrios L, Caballin M, Miro R, Ribas M, Subías A, Egozcue J. Cytogenetic analysis of lymphocytes from hospital workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research 1993; 286: 275–279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barquinero J F, Barrios L, Caballin M, Miro R, Ribas M, Subías A, Egozcue J. Occupational exposure to radiation induces an adaptive response in human lymphocytes. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1995; 67(2)187–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosi A, Olivieri G. Variability of the adaptive response to ionizing radiations in humans. Mutation Research 1989; 211(1)13–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai L, Liu S Z. Induction of cytogenetic adaptive response of somatic and germ cells in vivo and in vitro by low-dose x-irradiation. International Journal Radiation Biology 1990; 58: 187–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso R, Takahashi-Hyodo S, Peitl P, Jr, Ghilardi-Neto T, Sakamoto-Hojo E. Evaluation of chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei and sister chromatid exchanges in hospital workers chronically exposed to ionizing radiation. Teratogenesis, Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis 2001; 21: 431–439
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrano A V, Natarajan A T. Considerations for populations monitoring using cytogenetics techniques. ICPEMC Publications 14, Mutation Research 1988; 204: 379–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo D, Marinaccio A, Perniconi B, Settini A, Palmi S, Iavicoli S. Chromosomal aberration in long-haul air crew members. Mutation Research 2002; 513: 11–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes F, Dominguez I, Pinero J, Mateos J C. Adaptive response in human lymphocytes conditioned with hydrogen peroxide before irradiation with X-rays. Mutagenesis 1990; 5: 555–557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooqi Z, Kesavan P C. Low-dose radiation-induced adaptive response in bone marrow cells of mice. Mutation Research 1993; 302: 83–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feinendegen L E. The role of adaptive responses following exposure to ionizing radiation. Human Experimental Toxicology 1999; 18: 426–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn A. Quality assurance checks on a microselectron-HDR Selectron. Brachytherapy Journal 1990; 4: 112–115
   Google Scholar
• Flores M J, Pinero J, Ortiz T, Pastor N, Mateos M J, Cortes F. Both bovine and rabbit lymphocytes conditioned with hydrogen peroxide show an adaptive response to radiation damage. Mutation Research 1996; 372(1)9–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritz-Niggli H, Schaeppi-Buechi C. Adaptive response to dominant lethality of mature (class A) and immature (class B) oocytes of D. melanogaster to low doses of ionizing radiation: Effects in repair-proficient (yw) and repair-deficient strains (mei 41D5 and mus 302D1). International Journal of Radiation Biology 1991; 59(1)175–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourabi H, Mozdarani H. A cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus study of the radioadaptive response of lymphocytes of individuals occupationally exposed to chronic doses of radiation. Mutagenesis 1998; 13: 475–480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güerci A M, Dulout F N, Seoane A I. Cytogenetic analysis in Chinese hamster cells chronically exposed to low doses of X-rays. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2003; 79: 793–799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güerci A M, Dulout F N, Seoane A I. DNA damage in Chinese hamster cells repeatedly exposed to low doses of x-rays. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 2004; 104: 173–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guix B. High quality control of the brachyterapy dose systems with high quality sources. Oncology 1995; 18: 561–572
   Google Scholar
• Hain J, Jaussi R, Burkart W. Lack of adaptive response to low doses of ionizing radiation in human lymphocytes from five different donors. Mutation Research 1992; 283(2)137–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heimers A. Chromosome aberration analysis in Concorde pilots. Mutation Research 2000; 467: 169–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikushima T. Chromosomal responses to ionizing radiation reminiscent of an adaptive response in cultured Chinese hamster cells Mutation Research. 1987; 180(2)215–221
   Google Scholar
• Ikushima T. Radio-adaptive response: Characterization of a cytogenetic repair induced by low-level ionizing radiation in cultured Chinese hamster cells. Mutation Research 1989; 227(4)241–246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ishii K, Watanabe M. Participation of gap-junctional cell communication on the adaptive response in human cells induced by low dose of X-rays. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1996; 69: 291–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard B E. A composite microdose adaptive response (AR) and bystander effect (BE) model-application to low LET and high LET AR and BE data. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2008; 84: 681–701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little J, Azzam E, De Toledo S, Nagasawa H. Bystander effects: Intercellular transmission of radiation damage signals. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2002; 99: 159–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto A, Shibamoto Y, Sigie C, Ito M, Ayakawa S. Absense of radioadaptive responses in four cell-lines in vitro as determined by colony formation assay. Kurume Medical Journal 2006; 53: 1–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. Radiation-induced bystander effect, carcinogenesis and models. Oncogene 2003; 22: 7028–7033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. Radiation-induced bystander effects implications for cancer. National Review of Cancer 2004; 4: 158–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive P L. DNA damage and repair in individual cells: Applications of the comet assay in radiobiology. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1996; 75(4)395–405
   Google Scholar
• Olive P L, Johnston P, Banath J, Durand R. The comet assay: A new method to examine heterogeneity associated with solid tumors. Nature Medical 1998; 4: 103–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivieri G, Bodycote J, Wolff S. Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentration of radioactive thymidine. Science 1984; 223: 594–597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz-y-Miño C, Leone P, Chavez M, Bustamante G, Córdoba A, Gutierrez S, Penaherrera M S, Sanchez M. Follow up study of chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes in hospital workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research 1995; 335: 245–251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preston R J. Radiation biology: Concepts for radiation protection. Health Physics 2004; 87: 3–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson L, Cairns J. A new pathway for DNA repair in Escherichia coli. Nature 1977; 267: 281–283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranaryanan K, Von Duyn A, Loos M J, Natarajan A T. Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low-level radiation from radioisotopes or X-rays. Mutation Research 1989; 211(1)7–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sasaki M S. Radioadaptive response: An implication for the biological consequences of low dose-rate exposure to radiations. Mutation Research 1996; 358(2)207–213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sasaki M S, Ejima Y, Tachibana A, Yamada T, Ishizaki K, Shimizu T, Nomurat. DNA damage response pathway in radioadaptative response. Mutation Research 2002; 504: 101–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawant S, Randers-Pehrson G, Metting N, Hall E. Adaptive response and the bystander effect induced by radiation in C3H 10T(1/2) cells in culture. Radiation Research 2001; 156(2)177–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadley J D, Afzal X, Wolff S. Characterization of the adaptive response to ionizing radiation induced by low doses of X-rays to human lymphocytes. Radiation Research 1987; 111: 511–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadley J D, Wiencke J K. Induction of the adaptive response by X-rays is dependent on radiation intensity. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1989; 56(1)107–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N P, Mc Coy M T, Tice R R, Schneider L L. A simple technique for quantification of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimental Cell Research 1988; 175: 184–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoilov L, Mullenders L, Darroudi F, Natarajan A T. Adaptive response to DNA and chromosomal damage induced by X-rays in human blood lymphocytes. Mutagenesis 2007; 22(2)117–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streffer C. Adaptive response a universal phenomenon for radiological protection. In: Proceedings of the IRPA 2004a; 11: 1–24
   Google Scholar
• Streffer C. Bystander effects, adaptive response and genomic instability induced by prenatal irradiation. Mutation Research 2004b; 568: 79–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi A, Asakawa I, Yuki K, Matsumoto T, Kumamoto M, Kondo N, Ohnishi K, Tachibana A, Ohnishi T. Radiation-induced apoptosis in the scid mouse spleen after low dose-rate irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2002; 78: 689–693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi A, Ohnishi K, Asakawa I, Kondo N, Nakagawa H, Yonezawa M, Tachibana A, Matsumoto H, Ohnishi T. Radiation response of apoptosis in C57BL/6N mouse spleen after whole-body irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2001; 77: 939–945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tice R R, Strauss G H. The single cell gel electrophoresis/comet assay: A potential tool for detecting radiation-induced DNA damage in humans. Stem Cells 1995; 13: 207–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• Venkat S, Apte S, Chaubey R, Chauhan P. Radioadaptive response in human lymphocytes in vitro. Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology 2001; 20(3)165–175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward T H, Marples B. Technical report SYBR Green I and the improved sensitivity of the single-cell electrophoresis assay. International Journal Radiation 2000; 76: 61–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiencke J K, Afzal V, Olivieri G, Wolff S. Evidence that the [3H]thymidine-induced adaptive response of human lymphocytes to subsequent doses of X-rays involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Mutagenesis 1986; 1(5)375–380
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wojcik A, Tuschl H. Indications of an adaptive response in C57BL mice pre-exposed in vivo to low doses of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research 1990; 243(1)67–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolff S. The adaptive response in radiobiology: Evolving insights and implications. Environmental Health Perspectives 1998; 106: 277–283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff S, Afzal V, Wiencke J K, Olivieri G, Michaeli A. Human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of ionizing radiations become refractory to high doses of radiation as well to chemicals mutagens that induce double strand breaks in DNA. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1988; 53: 39–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar