Imaging tumour-bearing animals using clinical scanners

References

• Abramyuk A, Schindler S, Koch A, Tokalov S, Haberland U, Abolmaali N. Evaluierung der Tumorblutversorgung in verschiedenen Xenograft-Modellen mit dynamischer CT. RöFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren 2008; 180: S200
   Google Scholar
• Alejski A, Yuteng C, Rutt B K. Ultra-high-resolution imaging with a clinical MRI. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Magazine 2002; 5: 18–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaban R S, Hampshire V A. Challenges in small animal noninvasive imaging. ILAR Journal 2001; 42: 248–262
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barth R F. Rat brain tumor models in experimental neuro-oncology: The 9L, C6, T9, F98, RG2 (D74), RT-2 and CNS-1 gliomas. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1998; 36: 91–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann N, Mueggler T, Allegrini P R, Laurent D, Rudin M. From anatomy to the target: Contributions of magnetic resonance imaging to preclinical pharmaceutical research. Anatomical Record 2001; 265: 85–100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernstein M A, Zhou X J, Polzin J A, King K F, Ganin A, Pelc N J, Glover G H. Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: Analysis and correction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1998; 39: 300–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuf O, Jaillon F, Saint-Jalmes H. Small-animal MRI: Signal-to-noise ratio comparison at 7 and 1.5 T with multiple-animal acquisition strategies. MAGMA 2006; 19: 202–208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bock N A, Konyer N B, Henkelman R M. Multiple-mouse MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2003; 49: 158–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth N H, McDonald L E. Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics6th ed. Iowa State University Press, AmesUSA 1988
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann M A, Kemmling A, Groden C. Current issues and perspectives in small rodent magnetic resonance imaging using clinical MRI scanners. Methods 2007; 43: 79–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmann M A, Ulmer S, Leppert J, Nadrowitz R, Wuestenberg R, Nolte I, Petersen D, Groden C, Giese A, Gottschalk S. Analysis of mouse brain using a clinical 1.5 T scanner and a standard small loop surface coil. Brain Research 2006; 1068: 138–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Q Y, Kim S H, Choi K S, Kim S Y, Byun S J, Kim K W, Park S H, Juhng S K, Yoon K H. Colloidal gold nanoparticles as a blood-pool contrast agent for X-ray computed tomography in mice. Investigative Radiology 2007; 42: 797–806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheda A, Wrembel-Wargocka J, Lisiak E, Nowosielska E M, Marciniak M, Janiak M K. Single low doses of X rays inhibit the development of experimental tumor metastases and trigger the activities of NK cells in mice. Radiation Research 2004; 161: 335–340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, De Keyzer F, Wang H, Vandecaveye V, Landuyt W, Bosmans H, Hermans R, Marchal G, Ni Y. Diffusion weighted imaging in small rodents using clinical MRI scanners. Methods 2007; 43: 12–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y C, Galpern W R, Brownell A L, Matthews R T, Bogdanov M, Isacson O, Keltner J R, Beal M F, Rosen B R, Jenkins B G. Detection of dopaminergic neurotransmitter activity using pharmacologic MRI: Correlation with PET, microdialysis, and behavioral data. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1997; 38: 389–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry S R. The 2006 Henry N. Wagner Lecture: Of mice and men (and positrons) – advances in PET imaging technology. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2006; 47: 1735–1745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colby L A, Morenko B J. Clinical considerations in rodent bioimaging. Comparative Medicine 2004; 54: 623–630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day T K, Zeng G, Hooker A M, Bhat M, Scott B R, Turner D R, Sykes P J. Extremely low priming doses of X radiation induce an adaptive response for chromosomal inversions in pKZ1 mouse prostate. Radiation Research 2006; 166: 757–766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bazelaire C, Siauve N, Fournier L, Frouin F, Robert P, Clement O, de Kerviler E, Cuenod C A. Comprehensive model for simultaneous MRI determination of perfusion and permeability using a blood-pool agent in rats' rhabdomyosarcoma. European Radiology 2005; 15: 2497–2505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl K H, Hull R, Morton D, Pfister R, Rabemampianina Y, Smith D, Vidal J M, van de Vorstenbosch C. A good practice guide to the administration of substances and removal of blood, including routes and volumes. Journal of Applied Toxicology 2001; 21: 15–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007, Commission Staff Working Document – Annex to the 5th Report on the Statistics on the Number of Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes in the Member States of the European Union. Report nr. SEC/2007/1455, COM/2007/675 final, released: 05.11. 2007, Brussels. Available from the website: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/reports_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fan G, Zang P, Jing F, Wu Z, Guo Q. Usefulness of diffusion/perfusion-weighted MRI in rat gliomas: Correlation with histopathology. Academic Radiology 2005; 12: 640–651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink C, Kiessling F, Bock M, Lichy M P, Misselwitz B, Peschke P, Fusenig N E, Grobholz R, Delorme S. High-resolution three-dimensional MR angiography of rodent tumors: Morphologic characterization of intratumoral vasculature. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2003; 18: 59–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecknell P A. Anaesthesia of animals for biomedical research. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1993; 71: 885–894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford N L, Thornton M M, Holdsworth D W. Fundamental image quality limits for microcomputed tomography in small animals. Medical Physics 2003; 30: 2869–2877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fueger B J, Czernin J, Hildebrandt I, Tran C, Halpern B S, Stout D, Phelps M E, Weber W A. Impact of animal handling on the results of 18F-FDG PET studies in mice. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2006; 47: 999–1006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimori A, Okayasu R, Ishihara H, Yoshida S, Eguchi-Kasai K, Nojima K, Ebisawa S, Takahashi S. Extremely low dose ionizing radiation up-regulates CXC chemokines in normal human fibroblasts. Cancer Research 2005; 65: 10159–10163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale M E, Robbins A H, Hamburger R J, Widrich W C. Renal toxicity of contrast agents: Iopamidol, iothalamate, and diatrizoate. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 1984; 142: 333–335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginefri J C, Poirier-Quinot M, Girard O, Darrasse L. Technical aspects: Development, manufacture and installation of a cryo-cooled HTS coil system for high-resolution in-vivo imaging of the mouse at 1.5 T. Methods 2007; 43: 54–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginefri J C, Poirier-Quinot M, Robert P, Darrasse L. Contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI protocol with improved spatial and time resolution for in vivo microimaging of the mouse with a 1.5-T body scanner and a superconducting surface coil. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2005; 23: 239–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin J L, Shockcor J P. Metabolic profiles of cancer cells. Nature Reviews Cancer 2004; 4: 551–561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grippo P J, Sandgren E P. Modeling pancreatic cancer in animals to address specific hypotheses. Methods in Molecular Medicine 2005; 103: 217–243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gueant-Rodriguez R M, Romano A, Barbaud A, Brockow K, Gueant J L. Hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media. Current Pharmaceutical Design 2006; 12: 3359–3372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainfeld J F, Slatkin D N, Focella T M, Smilowitz H M. Gold nanoparticles: A new X-ray contrast agent. British Journal of Radiology 2006; 79: 248–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall E J, Giaccia A J. Radiobiology for the radiologist6th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2006
   Google Scholar
• Hanusch C, Hoeger S, Beck G C. Anaesthesia of small rodents during magnetic resonance imaging. Methods 2007; 43: 68–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijstek M W, Kranenburg O, Borel Rinkes I H. Mouse models of colorectal cancer and liver metastases. Digestive Surgery 2005; 22: 16–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heindl C, Hess A, Brune K. Refinement and reduction in animal experimentation: Options for new imaging techniques. ALTEX 2008; 25: 121–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herneth A M, Guccione S, Bednarski M. Apparent diffusion coefficient: A quantitative parameter for in vivo tumor characterization. European Journal of Radiology 2003; 45: 208–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt I J, Su H, Weber W A. Anesthesia and other considerations for in vivo imaging of small animals. ILAR Journal 2008; 49: 17–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imam S K. Molecular nuclear imaging: The radiopharmaceuticals (review). Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals 2005; 20: 163–172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inderbitzin D, Stoupis C, Sidler D, Gass M, Candinas D. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging in small rodents using a clinical 1.5 T MR scanner. Methods 2007; 43: 46–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling F, Heilmann M, Vosseler S, Lichy M, Krix M, Fink C, Kiessling I, Steinbauer H, Schad L, Fusenig N E, Delorme S. Dynamic T1-weighted monitoring of vascularization in human carcinoma heterotransplants by magnetic resonance imaging. International Journal of Cancer 2003; 104: 113–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim C F, Jackson E L, Kirsch D G, Grimm J, Shaw A T, Lane K, Kissil J, Olive K P, Sweet-Cordero A, Weissleder R, Jacks T. Mouse models of human non-small-cell lung cancer: Raising the bar. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 2005; 70: 241–250
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kunsch K, Kunsch S. Der Mensch in Zahlen2nd ed. Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin 2000, Spektrum
   Google Scholar
• Kwok W E, You Z. In vivo MRI using liquid nitrogen cooled phased array coil at 3.0 T. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2006; 24: 819–823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaManna J C, Harik S I. Regional studies of blood-brain barrier transport of glucose and leucine in awake and anesthetized rats. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 1986; 6: 717–723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landuyt W, Hermans R, Bosmans H, Sunaert S, Beatse E, Farina D, Meijerink M, Zhang H, Van Den Bogaert W, Lambin P, Marchal G. BOLD contrast fMRI of whole rodent tumour during air or carbogen breathing using echo-planar imaging at 1.5 T. European Radiology 2001; 11: 2332–2340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K H, Ko B H, Paik J Y, Jung K H, Choe Y S, Choi Y, Kim B T. Effects of anesthetic agents and fasting duration on 18F-FDG biodistribution and insulin levels in tumor-bearing mice. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2005; 46: 1531–1536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn J, Schwarz F, Schichor C, Wiesmann M. Cranial MRI of small rodents using a clinical MR scanner. Methods 2007; 43: 2–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukasik V M, Gillies R J. Animal anaesthesia for in vivo magnetic resonance. NMR in Biomedicine 2003; 16: 459–467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons S K. Advances in imaging mouse tumour models in vivo. Journal of Pathology 2005; 205: 194–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankoff D A, Bellon J R. Positron-emission tomographic imaging of cancer: Glucose metabolism and beyond. Seminars in Radiation Oncology 2001; 11: 16–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer J R. Molecular imaging agents for clinical positron emission tomography in oncology other than fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG): Applications, limitations and potential. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2007; 10: 180–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montet-Abou K, Daire J L, Ivancevic M K, Hyacinthe J N, Nguyen D, Jorge-Costa M, Morel D R, Vallee J P. Optimization of cardiac cine in the rat on a clinical 1.5-T MR system. MAGMA 2006; 19: 144–151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morton D B, Jennings M, Buckwell A, Ewbank R, Godfrey C, Holgate B, Inglis I, James R, Page C, Sharman I, Verschoyle R, Westall L, Wilson A B. Refining procedures for the administration of substances. Report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. British Veterinary Association Animal Welfare Foundation/Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments/Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals/Universities Federation for Animal Welfare. Laboratory Animals 2001; 35: 1–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muruganandham M, Lupu M, Dyke J P, Matei C, Linn M, Packman K, Kolinsky K, Higgins B, Koutcher J A. Preclinical evaluation of tumor microvascular response to a novel antiangiogenic/antitumor agent RO0281501 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2006; 5: 1950–1957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira P A, Colaco A, De la Cruz P L, Lopes C. Experimental bladder carcinogenesis-rodent models. Experimental Oncology 2006; 28: 2–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pandey R, Shankar B S, Sharma D, Sainis K B. Low dose radiation induced immunomodulation: Effect on macrophages and CD8+ T cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2005; 81: 801–812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps M E. Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2000; 97: 9226–9233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichler B J, Wehrl H F, Kolb A, Judenhofer M S. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: The next generation of multimodality imaging. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2008; 38: 199–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovtzer R, Agrawal A, Kotov N A, Popovtzer A, Balter J, Carey T E, Kopelman R. Targeted gold nanoparticles enable molecular CT imaging of cancer. Nano Letters 2008; 8: 4593–4596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu H H, Cofer G P, Hedlund L W, Johnson G A. Automated feedback control of body temperature for small animal studies with MR microscopy. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1997; 44: 1107–1113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson M K, Doss M, Shaller C, Narayanan D, Marks J D, Adler L P, Gonzalez Trotter D E, Adams G P. Quantitative immuno-positron emission tomography imaging of HER2-positive tumor xenografts with an iodine-124 labeled anti-HER2 diabody. Cancer Research 2005; 65: 1471–1478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosol T J, Tannehill-Gregg S H, LeRoy B E, Mandl S, Contag C H. Animal models of bone metastasis. Cancer 2003; 97: 748–757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland D J, Cherry S R. Small-animal preclinical nuclear medicine instrumentation and methodology. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2008; 38: 209–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmieder A H, Winter P M, Caruthers S D, Harris T D, Williams T A, Allen J S, Lacy E K, Zhang H, Scott M J, Hu G, Robertson J D, Wickline S A, Lanza G M. Molecular MR imaging of melanoma angiogenesis with ανβ3-targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2005; 53: 621–627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemann M D. Human PET/CT scanners: Feasibility for oncological in vivo imaging in mice. European Journal of Medical Research 2004; 9: 468–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemann M D, Beck R, Ziegler S. In vivo tumor imaging in mice using a state-of-the-art clinical PET/CT in comparison with a small animal PET and a small animal CT. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment 2006; 5: 537–542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczesny G, Veihelmann A, Massberg S, Nolte D, Messmer K. Long-term anaesthesia using inhalatory isoflurane in different strains of mice-the haemodynamic effects. Laboratory Animals 2004; 38: 64–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taschereau R, Chatziioannou A F. Monte Carlo simulations of absorbed dose in a mouse phantom from 18-fluorine compounds. Medical Physics 2007; 34: 1026–1036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taschereau R, Chow P L, Chatziioannou A F. Monte Carlo simulations of dose from microCT imaging procedures in a realistic mouse phantom. Medical Physics 2006; 33: 216–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsumi M, Nakamoto Y, Traughber B, Marshall L T, Geschwind J F, Wahl R L. Initial experience in small animal tumor imaging with a clinical positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanner using 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Cancer Research 2003; 63: 6252–6257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoeny H C, De Keyzer F, Vandecaveye V, Chen F, Sun X, Bosmans H, Hermans R, Verbeken E K, Boesch C, Marchal G, Landuyt W, Ni Y. Effect of vascular targeting agent in rat tumor model: Dynamic contrast-enhanced versus diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2005; 237: 492–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsen F, Ersland L, Nordli H, Enger P O, Huszthy P C, Lundervold A, Standnes T, Bjerkvig R, Lund-Johansen M. Imaging of experimental rat gliomas using a clinical MR scanner. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2003; 63: 225–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topal A, Gul N, Ilcol Y, Gorgul O S. Hepatic effects of halothane, isoflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series A: Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine 2003; 50: 530–533
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toyama H, Ichise M, Liow J S, Vines D C, Seneca N M, Modell K J, Seidel J, Green M V, Innis R B. Evaluation of anesthesia effects on [18F]FDG uptake in mouse brain and heart using small animal PET. Nuclear Medicine and Biology 2004; 31: 251–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer S, Reeh M, Krause J, Herdegen T, Heldt-Feindt J, Jansen O, Rohr A. Dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted perfusion MRI (DSC-MRI) in a glioma model of the rat brain using a conventional receive-only surface coil with a inner diameter of 47mm at a clinical 1.5T scanner. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2008; 172: 168–172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UKCCCR). UKCCCR Guidelines for the Welfare of Animals in Experimental Neoplasia. British Journal of Cancer 1998; 77: 1–10, 2nd ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Furth W R, Laughlin S, Taylor M D, Salhia B, Mainprize T, Henkelman M, Cusimano M D, Ackerley C, Rutka J T. Imaging of murine brain tumors using a 1.5 Tesla clinical MRI system. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 2003; 30: 326–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zutphen L FM, Baumans V, Beynen A C. Principles of laboratory animal scienceRev ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam 2001
   Google Scholar
• Winter P M, Caruthers S D, Kassner A, Harris T D, Chinen L K, Allen J S, Lacy E K, Zhang H, Robertson J D, Wickline S A, Lanza G M. Molecular imaging of angiogenesis in nascent Vx-2 rabbit tumors using a novel ανβ3-targeted nanoparticle and 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Research 2003; 63: 5838–5843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf G, Grüner S, Schindler S, Koch A, Tokalov S, Laniado M, Baumann M, Abolmaali N. Diffusionsgewichtete und morphologische Ganzkörper-MRT der Ratte bei 1.5 T. RöFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren 2007; 179: S272
   Google Scholar
• Xu S, Gade T P, Matei C, Zakian K, Alfieri A A, Hu X, Holland E C, Soghomonian S, Tjuvajev J, Ballon D, Koutcher J A. In vivo multiple-mouse imaging at 1.5 T. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2003; 49: 551–557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H S, Song A Q, Lu Y D, Qiu W S, Shen F Z. Effects of low-dose radiation on tumor growth, erythrocyte immune function and SOD activity in tumor-bearing mice. Chinese Medical Journal 2004; 117: 1036–1039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Jugold M, Woenne E C, Lammers T, Morgenstern B, Mueller M M, Zentgraf H, Bock M, Eisenhut M, Semmler W, Kiessling F. Specific targeting of tumor angiogenesis by RGD-conjugated ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles using a clinical 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner. Cancer Research 2007; 67: 1555–1562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar