Static magnetic field of 0.2–0.4 T promotes the recovery of hindlimb unloading-induced bone loss in mice

References

• Aydin N, Bezer M. 2011. The effect of an intramedullary implant with a static magnetic field on the healing of the osteotomised rabbit femur. Int Orthop. 35(1):135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett CA, Pawluk RJ, Pilla AA. 1974. Augmentation of bone repair by inductively coupled electromagnetic fields. Science. 184(4136):575–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, Muller R. 2010. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 25(7):1468–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camozzi V, Tossi A, Simoni E, Pagani F, Francucci CM, Moro L. 2007. Role of biochemical markers of bone remodeling in clinical practice. J Endocrinol Invest. 30(6 Suppl):13–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cunningham HC, West DWD, Baehr LM, Tarke FD, Baar K, Bodine SC, Christiansen BA. 2018. Age-dependent bone loss and recovery during hindlimb unloading and subsequent reloading in rats. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 19(1):223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong D, Yang J, Zhang G, Huyan T, Shang P. 2019. 16 T high static magnetic field inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand-induced osteoclast differentiation by regulating iron metabolism in Raw264.7 cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 13(12):2181–2190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Yu L, Liu J, Li Y, Wu Y, Huang Z, Wu D, Wang H, Wu Z, Qiu G. 2019. Enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells in 3-dimensional printed porous titanium scaffolds by static magnetic field through up-regulating Smad4. Faseb J. 33(5):6069–6081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing D, Cai J, Wu Y, Shen G, Li F, Xu Q, Xie K, Tang C, Liu J, Guo W, et al. 2014. Pulsed electromagnetic fields partially preserve bone mass, microarchitecture, and strength by promoting bone formation in hindlimb-suspended rats. J Bone Miner Res. 29(10):2250–2261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim EC, Leesungbok R, Lee SW, Lee HW, Park SH, Mah SJ, Ahn SJ. 2015. Effects of moderate intensity static magnetic fields on human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 36(4):267–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim EC, Park J, Kwon IK, Lee SW, Park SJ, Ahn SJ. 2017. Static magnetic fields promote osteoblastic/cementoblastic differentiation in osteoblasts, cementoblasts, and periodontal ligament cells. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 47(5):273–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim EC, Park J, Noh G, Park SJ, Noh K, Kwon IK, Ahn SJ. 2018. Effects of moderate intensity static magnetic fields on osteoclastic differentiation in mouse bone marrow cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 39(5):394–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang TF, Leblanc AD, Evans HJ, Lu Y. 2006. Adaptation of the proximal femur to skeletal reloading after long-duration spaceflight. J Bone Miner Res. 21(8):1224–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Yu B, Zhou D, He C, Zhuo Q, Hulme JM. 2013. Electromagnetic fields for treating osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (12):Cd003523.
   Google Scholar
• Morey-Holton ER, Globus RK. 2002. Hindlimb unloading rodent model: technical aspects. J Appl Physiol (1985). 92(4):1367–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcivici E, Judex S. 2014. Trabecular bone recovers from mechanical unloading primarily by restoring its mechanical function rather than its morphology. Bone. 67:122–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puricelli E, Ulbrich LM, Ponzoni D, Filho JJ. 2006. Histological analysis of the effects of a static magnetic field on bone healing process in rat femurs. Head Face Med. 2:43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saifzadeh S, Hobbenaghi R, Shokouhi Sabet Jalali F, Kabiri B. 2007. Effect of a static magnetic field on bone healing in the dog: radiographic and histopathological studies. Iran J Vet Res. 8(1):8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibonga JD, Evans HJ, Sung H, Spector E, Lang T, Oganov V, Bakulin A, Shackelford L, LeBlanc A. 2007. Recovery of spaceflight-induced bone loss: bone mineral density after long-duration missions as fitted with an exponential function. Bone. 41(6):973–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JK. 2020. Osteoclasts and Microgravity. Life (Basel, Switzerland). 10(9):207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taniguchi N, Kanai S. 2007. Efficacy of static magnetic field for locomotor activity of experimental osteopenia. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 4(1):99–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner CH, Burr DB. 1993. Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial. Bone. 14(4):595–608.
   Google Scholar
• Vico L, Collet P, Guignandon A, Lafage-Proust MH, Thomas T, Rehaillia M, Alexandre C. 2000. Effects of long-term microgravity exposure on cancellous and cortical weight-bearing bones of cosmonauts. Lancet. 355(9215):1607–1611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vico L, Hargens A. 2018. Skeletal changes during and after spaceflight. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 14(4):229–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vico L, van Rietbergen B, Vilayphiou N, Linossier MT, Locrelle H, Normand M, Zouch M, Gerbaix M, Bonnet N, Novikov V, et al. 2017. Cortical and trabecular bone microstructure did not recover at weight-bearing skeletal sites and progressively deteriorated at non-weight-bearing sites during the year following international space station missions. J Bone Miner Res. 32(10):2010–2021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Okano H, Tomita N, Ikada Y. 2011. Recovery effects of a 180 mT static magnetic field on bone mineral density of osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae in ovariectomized rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Tomita N, Ohata R, Yan Q, Ikada Y. 2001. Static magnetic field effects on bone formation of rats with an ischemic bone model. Biomed Mater Eng. 11(3):257–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto Y, Ohsaki Y, Goto T, Nakasima A, Iijima T. 2003. Effects of static magnetic fields on bone formation in rat osteoblast cultures. J Dent Res. 82(12):962–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Li J, Cui X, Li W, Xue Y, Shang P, Zhang H. 2020. Blocking glucocorticoid signaling in osteoblasts and osteocytes prevents mechanical unloading-induced cortical bone loss. Bone. 130:115108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Meng X, Dong D, Xue Y, Chen X, Wang S, Shen Y, Zhang G, Shang P. 2018. Iron overload involved in the enhancement of unloading-induced bone loss by hypomagnetic field. Bone. 114:235–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Zhang H, Shang P. 2020. Effect of static magnetic field on bone and its molecular mechanism. Chin Sci Bull. 65(13):1238–1250.
   Google Scholar
• Yu S, Shang P. 2014. A review of bioeffects of static magnetic field on rodent models. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 114(1):14–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun HM, Ahn SJ, Park KR, Kim MJ, Kim JJ, Jin GZ, Kim HW, Kim EC. 2016. Magnetic nanocomposite scaffolds combined with static magnetic field in the stimulation of osteoblastic differentiation and bone formation. Biomaterials. 85:88–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Gan L, Zhu X, Wang J, Han L, Cheng P, Jing D, Zhang X, Shan Q. 2018. Moderate-intensity 4mT static magnetic fields prevent bone architectural deterioration and strength reduction by stimulating bone formation in streptozotocin-treated diabetic rats. Bone. 107:36–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Meng X, Ding C, Xie L, Yang P, Shang P. 2017. Regulation of osteoclast differentiation by static magnetic fields. Electromagn Biol Med. 36(1):8–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu S, He H, Zhang C, Wang H, Gao C, Yu X, He C. 2017. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bioelectromagnetics. 38(6):406–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar