The cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay for cryopreserved whole blood

References

• Alam I, Goldeck D, Larbi A, Pawelec G. 2012. Flow cytometric lymphocyte subset analysis using material from frozen whole blood. J Immunoassay Immunochem. 33(2):128–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeyens A, Thierens H, Claes K, Poppe B, Messiaen L, De Ridder L, Vral A. 2002. Chromosomal radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients with a known or putative genetic predisposition. Br J Cancer. 87(12):1379–1385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonassi S, Fenech M, Lando C, Lin Y, Ping Ceppi M, Peter Chang W, Holland N, Kirsch-Volders M, Zeiger E, Ban S, et al. 2001. Human micronucleus project: international database comparison for results with the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay in human lymphocytes: I. Effect of laboratory protocol, scoring criteria, and host factors on the frequency of micronuclei. Environ Mol Mutagen. 37(1):31–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braudeau C, Salabert-Le Guen N, Chevreuil J, Rimbert M, Martin JC, Josien R. 2021. An easy and reliable whole blood freezing method for flow cytometry immuno-phenotyping and functional analyses. Cytom Part B – Clin Cytom. 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Wang LE, Spitz MR, Wei Q. 2001. Cryopreserving whole blood for functional assays using viable lymphocytes in molecular epidemiology studies. Cancer Lett. 166(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claes K, Depuydt J, Taylor AMR, Last JI, Baert A, Schietecatte P, Vandersickel V, Poppe B, De Leeneer K, D’Hooghe M, et al. 2013. Variant ataxia telangiectasia: clinical and molecular findings and evaluation of radiosensitive phenotypes in a patient and relatives. Neuromolecular Med. 15(3):447–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenech M. 2007. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Nat Protoc. 2(5):1084–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenech M. 2010. The lymphocyte cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay and its application in radiation biodosimetry. Health Phys. 98(2):234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenech M, Bonassi S, Turner J, Lando C, Ceppi M, Peter W, Holland N, Kirsch-Volders M, Zeiger E, Paola M, et al. 2003. Intra- and inter-laboratory variation in the scoring of micronuclei and nucleoplasmic bridges in binucleated human lymphocytes: results of an international slide-scoring exercise by the HUMN project. Mutat Res. 534(1–2):45–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowke KR, Behnke J, Hanson C, Shea K, Cosentino LM. 2000. Apoptosis: a method for evaluating the cryopreservation of whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Immunol Methods. 244(1–2):139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francies FZ, Wainwright R, Poole J, De Leeneer K, Coene I, Wieme G, Poirel HA, Brichard B, Vermeulen S, Vral A, et al. 2018. Diagnosis of Fanconi anaemia by ionising radiation or mitomycin C-induced micronuclei. DNA Repair. 61:17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajski G, Gerić M, Živković Semren T, Tariba Lovaković B, Oreščanin V, Pizent A. 2020. Application of the comet assay for the evaluation of DNA damage from frozen human whole blood samples: implications for human biomonitoring. Toxicol Lett. 319:58–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennery AR. 2006. Primary immunodeficiency syndromes associated with defective DNA double-strand break repair. Br Med Bull. 77–78(1):71–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodarzi AA, Jeggo PA. 2012. Irradiation induced foci (IRIF) as a biomarker for radiosensitivity. Mutat Res. 736(1–2):39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes RB, Smith CO, Huang W, Read Y, Kopp WC. 2002. Whole blood cryopreservation in epidemiological studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 11(11):1496–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylmann D, Ponath V, Kindler T, Kaina B. 2021. Comparison of DNA repair and radiosensitivity of different blood cell populations. Sci Rep. 11(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hininger I, Chollat-Namy A, Sauvaigo S, Osman M, Faure H, Cadet J, Favier A, Roussel AM. 2004. Assessment of DNA damage by comet assay on frozen total blood: method and evaluation in smokers and non-smokers. Mutat Res. 558(1–2):75–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hønge BL, Petersen MS, Olesen R, Møller BK, Erikstrup C. 2017. Optimizing recovery of frozen human peripheral blood mononuclear cells for flow cytometry. PLoS One. 12(11):e0187440–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppen G, De Prins S, Jacobs A, Nelen V, Schoeters G, Langie SAS. 2018. The comet assay in human biomonitoring: cryopreservation of whole blood and comparison with isolated mononuclear cells. Mutagenesis. 33(1):41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladeira C, Koppen G, Scavone F, Giovannelli L. 2019. The comet assay for human biomonitoring: effect of cryopreservation on DNA damage in different blood cell preparations. Mutat Res. 843:11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenskiöld C, Mellgren K, Abrahamsson J, Bemark M. 2018. Determination of blood cell subtype concentrations from frozen whole blood samples using TruCount beads. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 94(4):660–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louagie H, Philippé J, Vral A, Cornelissen M, Thierens H, Ridd D. 1998. Induction of micronuclei and apoptosis in natural killer cells com pared to T lymphocytes after y-irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 73(2):179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milic M, Ivan O, Vinkovi I, Vu M, Bonassi S, Rojas E, Castillo D. 2019. Alkaline comet assay results on fresh and one-year frozen whole blood in small volume without cryo-protection in a group of people with different health status. Mutat Res Gen Tox En. 843:3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miszczyk J, Rawojć K. 2020. Effects of culturing technique on human peripheral blood lymphocytes response to proton and X-ray radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 96(4):424–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miszczyk J, Rawojć K, Panek A, Swakoń J, Prasanna PG, Rydygier M. 2015. Response of human lymphocytes to proton radiation of 60 MeV compared to 250 kV X-rays by the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Radiother Oncol. 115(1):128–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohseni-Meybodi A, Mozdarani H, Vosough P. 2007. Cytogenetic sensitivity of G0 lymphocytes of Fanconi anemia patients and obligate carriers to mitomycin C and ionizing radiation. Cytogenet Genome Res. 119(3-4):191–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Driscoll M, Gennery AR, Seidel J, Concannon P, Jeggo PA. 2004. An overview of three new disorders associated with genetic instability: LIG4 syndrome, RS-SCID and ATR-Seckel syndrome. DNA Repair. 3(8–9):1227–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. Test No. 487: In vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Pajic J, Rakic B, Rovcanin B, Jovicic D, Novakovic I, Milovanovic A, Pajic V. 2015. Inter-individual variability in the response of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to ionizing radiation: comparison of the dicentric and micronucleus assays. Radiat Environ Biophys. 54(3):317–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard JM, Gatti RA. 2009. Clinical radiation sensitivity with DNA repair disorders: an overview. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 74(5):1323–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran H, Laux J, Moldovan I, Caspell R, Lehmann PV, Subbramanian RA. 2012. Optimal thawing of cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells for use in high-throughput human immune monitoring studies. Cells. 1(3):313–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodrigues AS, Oliveira NG, Gil OM, Léonard A, Rueff J. 2005. Use of cytogenetic indicators in radiobiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 115(1–4):455–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sioen S, Cloet K, Vral A, Baeyens A. 2020. The cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay on human isolated fresh and cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Pers Med. 10(3):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer S, Buraczewska I, Kruszewski M. 2020. Micronucleus assay: the state of art, and future directions. Int J Mol Sci. 21(4):7–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens VL, Patel AV, Feigelson HS, Rodriguez C, Thun MJ, Calle EE. 2007. Cryopreservation of whole blood samples collected in the field for a large epidemiologic study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 16(10):2160–2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suto Y, Tominaga T, Akiyama M, Hirai M. 2020. Cytogenetic examination of human peripheral blood lymphocytes cryopreserved after gamma irradiation: a pilot study. Cytologia. 85(1):71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschoor CP, Kohli V. 2018. Cryopreserved whole blood for the quantification of monocyte, T-cell and NK-cell subsets, and monocyte receptor expression by multi-color flow cytometry: a methodological study based on participants from the Canadian longitudinal study on aging. Cytometry A. 93(5):548–555.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vozilova AV, Akhmadullina YR. 2019. Study of the individual radiosensitivity in humans based on the assessment of the frequency of chromosome aberrations and micronuclei in peripheral blood T lymphocytes. Russ J Genet. 55(10):1234–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vral A, Thierens H, Baeyens A, De Ridder L. 2002. The micronucleus and G2-phase assays for human blood lymphocytes as biomarkers of individual sensitivity to ionizing radiation: limitations imposed by intraindividual variability. Radiat Res. 157(4):472–477.2.0.co;2]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng H, Morimoto K. 2009. Mutation research/genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis differential responses to mutagens among human lymphocyte subpopulations. Mutat Res – Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 672(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zijno A, Saini F, Crebelli R. 2007. Suitability of cryopreserved isolated lymphocytes for the analysis of micronuclei with the cytokinesis-block method. Mutagenesis. 22(5):311–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar