An intercomparison exercise to compare scoring criteria and develop image databank for biodosimetry in South Korea

References

• ISO. 2014a. Radiation protection-performance criteria for service laboratories performing biological dosimetry by cytogenetics. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 19238. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2014b. Radiological protection – performance criteria for laboratories using the cytokinesis block micronucleus (CBMN) assay in peripheral blood lymphocytes for biological dosimetry. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 17099. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2019. Radiological protection — performance criteria for laboratories using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) translocation assay for assessment of exposure to ionizing radiation. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 20046. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Beinke C, Barnard S, Boulay-Greene H, De Amicis A, De Sanctis S, Herodin F, Jones A, Kulka U, Lista F, Lloyd D, et al. 2013. Laboratory intercomparison of the dicentric chromosome analysis assay. Radiat Res. 180(2):129–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely WF, Carr Z, Chu MC, Dayal-Drager R, Fujimoto K, Hopmeir M, Kulka U, Lillis-Hearne P, Livingston GK, Lloyd DC, et al. 2009. WHO 1st consultation on the development of a global biodosimetry laboratories network for radiation emergencies (BioDoseNet). Radiat Res. 171(1):127–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman CN, Koerner JF. 2016. Biodosimetry: medicine, science, and systems to support the medical decision-maker following a large scale nuclear or radiation incident. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 172(1-3):38–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giorgio M, Barquinero JF, Vallerga MB, Radl A, Taja MR, Seoane A, De Luca J, Oliveira MS, Valdivia P, Lima OG, et al. 2011. Biological dosimetry intercomparison exercise: an evaluation of triage and routine mode results by robust methods. Radiat Res. 175(5):638–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia OF, Ramalho AT, Di Giorgio M, Mir SS, Espinoza ME, Manzano J, Nasazzi N, Lopez I. 1995. Intercomparison in cytogenetic dosimetry among five laboratories from Latin America. Mutat Res. 327(1–2):33–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA. 2011. Cytogenetic dosimetry: applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies. EPR-biodosimetry. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• Jang S, Suto Y, Liu J, Liu Q, Zuo Y, Duy PN, Miura T, Abe Y, Hamasaki K, Suzuki K, et al. 2019. Capabilities of the Arados-Wg03 regional network for large-scale radiological and nuclear emergency situations in Asia. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 186(1):139–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang JK, Seo S, Jin YW. 2019. Health effects of radon exposure. Yonsei Med J. 60(7):597–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulka U, Abend M, Ainsbury E, Badie C, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Beinke C, Bortolin E, Cucu A, De Amicis A, et al. 2017. RENEB – running the European network of biological dosimetry and physical retrospective dosimetry. Int J Radiat Biol. 93(1):2–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulka U, Wojcik A, Di Giorgio M, Wilkins R, Suto Y, Jang S, Quing-Jie L, Jiaxiang L, Ainsbury E, Woda C, et al. 2018. Biodosimetry and biodosimetry networks for managing radiation emergency. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 182(1):128–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanfranco F, Kamischke A, Zitzmann M, Nieschlag E. 2004. Klinefelter's syndrome. Lancet. 364(9430):273–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oestreicher U, Samaga D, Ainsbury E, Antunes AC, Baeyens A, Barrios L, Beinke C, Beukes P, Blakely WF, Cucu A, et al. 2017. RENEB intercomparisons applying the conventional dicentric chromosome assay (DCA). Int J Radiat Biol. 93(1):20–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto MM, Santos NF, Amaral A. 2010. Current status of biodosimetry based on standard cytogenetic methods. Radiat Environ Biophys. 49(4):567–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roizen NJ, Patterson D. 2003. Down's syndrome. Lancet. 361(9365):1281–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romm H, Ainsbury EA, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Beinke C, Cucu A, Domene MM, Filippi S, Monteiro Gil O, Gregoire E, et al. 2017. Web based scoring is useful for validation and harmonisation of scoring criteria within RENEB. Int J Radiat Biol. 93(1):110–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romm H, Beinke C, Garcia O, Di Giorgio M, Gregoire E, Livingston G, Lloyd DC, Martinez-Lopez W, Moquet JE, Sugarman SL, et al. 2016. A new cytogenetic biodosimetry image repository for the dicentric assay. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 172(1–3):192–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothkamm K, Beinke C, Romm H, Badie C, Balagurunathan Y, Barnard S, Bernard N, Boulay-Greene H, Brengues M, De Amicis A, et al. 2013. Comparison of established and emerging biodosimetry assays. Radiat Res. 180(2):111–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo S, Ha WH, Kang JK, Lee D, Park S, Kwon TE, Jin YW. 2019. Health effects of exposure to radon: implications of the radon bed mattress incident in Korea. Epidemiol Health. 41:e2019004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan JM, Prasanna PG, Grace MB, Wathen LK, Wallace RL, Koerner JF, Coleman CN. 2013. Assessment of biodosimetry methods for a mass-casualty radiological incident: medical response and management considerations. Health Phys. 105(6):540–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suto Y, Hirai M, Akiyama M, Kobashi G, Itokawa M, Akashi M, Sugiura N. 2013. Biodosimetry of restoration workers for the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station accident. Health Phys. 105(4):366–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz HM, Williams BB, Flood AB. 2014. Overview of the principles and practice of biodosimetry. Radiat Environ Biophys. 53(2):221–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sybert VP, McCauley E. 2004. Turner's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 351(12):1227–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker JD. 2008. Low-dose ionizing radiation and chromosome translocations: a review of the major considerations for human biological dosimetry. Mutat Res. 659(3):211–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker JD, Morgan WF, Awa AA, Bauchinger M, Blakey D, Cornforth MN, Littlefield LG, Natarajan AT, Shasserre C. 1995. A proposed system for scoring structural aberrations detected by chromosome painting. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 68(3–4):211–221.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vinnikov VA, Belyakov O. 2020. Radiation exposure biomarkers in the practice of medical radiology: cooperative research and the role of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Biodosimetry/Radiobiology Laboratory. Health Phys. 119(1):83–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voisin P. 2015. Standards in biological dosimetry: A requirement to perform an appropriate dose assessment. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 793:115–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins RC, Carr Z, Lloyd DC. 2016. An update of the WHO Biodosenet: developments since its inception. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 172(1–3):47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida MA, Hayata I, Tateno H, Tanaka K, Sonta S, Kodama S, Kodama Y, Sasaki MS. 2007. The Chromosome Network for biodosimetry in Japan. Radiat Meas. 42(6–7):1125–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar