Lessons on harmonization of scoring criteria for dicentric chromosome assay in South Korea

References

• [IAEA] International Atomic Energy Agency. 2011. Cytogenetic dosimetry: application for preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies. In: IAEA emergency preparedness and response series EPR-biodosimetry. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• [ISO] International Organization for Standardization. 2005. Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Abend M, Blakely WF, Ostheim P, Schuele S, Port M. 2022. Early molecular markers for retrospective biodosimetry and prediction of acute health effects. J Radiol Prot. 42(1):010503. doi:10.1088/1361-6498/ac2434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balajee AS, Smith T, Ryan T, Escalona M, Dainiak N. 2018. Development of a miniaturized version of dicentric chromosome assay tool for radiological triage. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 182(1):139–145. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncy127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely WF, Carr Z, Chu MC, Dayal-Drager R, Fujimoto K, Hopmeir M, Kulka U, Lillis-Hearne P, Livingston GK, Lloyd DC, et al. 2009. WHO 1st consultation on the development of a global biodosimetry laboratories network for radiation emergencies (BioDoseNet). Radiat Res. 171(1):127–139. doi:10.1667/RR1549.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García O, Di Giorgio M, Radl A, Taja MR, Sapienza CE, Deminge MM, Fernández Rearte J, Stuck Oliveira M, Valdivia P, Lamadrid AI, et al. 2016. The Latin American Biological Dosimetry Network (LBDNet). Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 171(1):64–69. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncw209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García OF, Ramalho AT, Di Giorgio M, Mir SS, Espinoza ME, Manzano J, Nasazzi N, López I. 1995. Intercomparison in cytogenetic dosimetry among five laboratories from Latin America. Mutat Res. 327(1-2):33–39. doi:10.1016/0027-5107(94)00066-e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garty G, Turner HC, Salerno A, Bertucci A, Zhang J, Chen Y, Dutta A, Sharma P, Bian D, Taveras M, et al. 2016. THE DECADE OF THE RABiT (2005–15). Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 172(1–3):201–206. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncw172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang S, Suto Y, Liu J, Liu Q, Zuo Y, Duy PN, Miura T, Abe Y, Hamasaki K, Suzuki K, et al. 2019. Capabilities of the Arados-Wg03 regional network for large-scale radiological and nuclear emergency situations in Asia. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 186(1):139–142. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncy279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulka U, Wojcik A, Di Giorgio M, Wilkins R, Suto Y, Jang S, Quing-Jie L, Jiaxiang L, Ainsbury E, Woda C, et al. 2018. Biodosimetry and biodosimetry networks for managing radiation emergency. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 182(1):128–138. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncy137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacombe J, Sima C, Amundson SA, Zenhausern F. 2018. Candidate gene biodosimetry markers of exposure to external ionizing radiation in human blood: a systematic review. PLoS One. 13(6):e0198851. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YH, Lee Y, Yoon HJ, Yang SS, Joo HM, Kim JY, Cho SJ, Jo WS, Jeong SK, Oh SJ, et al. 2021. An intercomparison exercise to compare scoring criteria and develop image databank for biodosimetry in South Korea. Int J Radiat Biol. 97(9):1199–1205. doi:10.1080/09553002.2021.1941384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro Gil O, Vaz P, Romm H, De Angelis C, Antunes AC, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, Bortolin E, Burbidge CI, Cucu A, et al. 2017. Capabilities of the RENEB network for research and large scale radiological and nuclear emergency situations. Int J Radiat Biol. 93(1):136–141. doi:10.1080/09553002.2016.1227107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moquet J, Barnard S, Rothkamm K. 2014. Gamma-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents: comparison of a rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ protocol with a routine method. PeerJ. 2:e282. doi:10.7717/peerj.282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oestreicher U, Samaga D, Ainsbury E, Antunes AC, Baeyens A, Barrios L, Beinke C, Beukes P, Blakely WF, Cucu A, et al. 2017. RENEB intercomparisons applying the conventional Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA). Int J Radiat Biol. 93(1):20–29. doi:10.1080/09553002.2016.1233370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannkuk EL, Laiakis EC, Garty G, Ponnaiya B, Wu X, Shuryak I, Ghandhi SA, Amundson SA, Brenner DJ, Fornace AJ. 2023. Variable dose rates in realistic radiation exposures: effects on small molecule markers of ionizing radiation in the murine model. Radiat Res. 200(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port M, Barquinero J-F, Endesfelder D, Moquet J, Oestreicher U, Terzoudi G, Trompier F, Vral A, Abe Y, Ainsbury L, et al. 2023. RENEB inter-laboratory comparison 2021: the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Radiat Res. 199(6):535–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romm H, Ainsbury E, Barnard S, Barrios L, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, Deperas M, Gregoire E, Koivistoinen A, Lindholm C, et al. 2013. Automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes as a tool in large scale radiation accidents. Mutat Res. 756(1–2):174–183. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romm H, Ainsbury EA, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Beinke C, Cucu A, Domene MM, Filippi S, Monteiro Gil O, Gregoire E, et al. 2017. Web based scoring is useful for validation and harmonisation of scoring criteria within RENEB. Int J Radiat Biol. 93(1):110–117. doi:10.1080/09553002.2016.1206228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunck C, Johannes T, Varga D, Lörch T, Plesch A. 2004. New developments in automated cytogenetic imaging: unattended scoring of dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei, single cell gel electrophoresis, and fluorescence signals. Cytogenet Genome Res. 104(1–4):383–389. doi:10.1159/000077520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan JM, Prasanna PG, Grace MB, Wathen LK, Wallace RL, Koerner JF, Coleman CN. 2013. Assessment of biodosimetry methods for a mass-casualty radiological incident: medical response and management considerations. Health Phys. 105(6):540–554. doi:10.1097/HP.0b013e31829cf221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voisin P. 2015. Standards in biological dosimetry: a requirement to perform an appropriate dose assessment. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 793:115–122. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins RC, Beaton-Green LA, Lachapelle S, Kutzner BC, Ferrarotto C, Chauhan V, Marro L, Livingston GK, Boulay Greene H, Flegal FN. 2015. Evaluation of the annual Canadian biodosimetry network intercomparisons. Int J Radiat Biol. 91(5):443–451. doi:10.3109/09553002.2015.1012305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar