Colonialism and imperialism in the quest for a universalist Korean-style international relations theory

References

• Acharya, Amitav (2008) ‘Theoretical perspectives on international relations in Asia’ in David Shambaugh and Michael Yahuda (eds) International relations of Asia (Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield), 57–82
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, Amitav (2011) ‘Dialogue and discovery: in search of international relations theories beyond the West’, Millennium, 39:3, 619–637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (2010) in Amitav Acharya and Barry Buzan (eds) Non-Western international relations theory (Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Agathangelou, Anna M and LHM Ling (2009) in (ed) Transforming world politics: from empire to multiple worlds (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Alagappa, Muthiah (2011) ‘International relations studies in Asia: distinctive trajectories’, International Relations of the Asia–Pacific, 11:2, 193–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, Byung-Sam (2003) ‘In search of the origin and identity of Korean politics’, Korean Political Science Review, 37:2, 87–105 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Behera, Navnita Chadha (2007) ‘Re-imagining IR in India’, International Relations of the Asia–Pacific, 7:3, 341–368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (2008) in Navnita Chadha Behera (ed) International relations in South Asia: search for an alternative paradigm (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Beier, Marshall (2005) in (ed) International relations in uncommon places: indigeneity, cosmology, and the limits of international theory (Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave)
   Google Scholar
• Biersteker, Thomas J (1999) ‘Eroding boundaries, contested terrain’, International Studies Review, 1:1, 3–9
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, William A (2004) ‘Nationalizing international theory: race, class and the English School’, Global Society, 18:4, 305–323
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, William A (2008) ‘Chinese visions of world order: post-hegemonic or a new hegemony’, International Studies Review, 10:4, 749–761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, David (2001) ‘International engagements: the politics of North American international theory’, Political Theory, 29:3, 432–448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Ching-Chang (2011) ‘The absence of non-Western IR theory in Asia reconsidered’, International Relations of the Asia–Pacific, 11:1, 1–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Ching-Chang (2012) ‘The im/possibility of building indigenous theories in a hegemonic discipline: the case of Japanese international relations’, Asian Perspective, 36:3, 463–492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Jong Kun (2008) ‘Theorizing East Asian international relations in Korea’, Asian Perspective, 32:1, 193–216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Jong Kun and Chung-in Moon (2010) ‘Understanding Northeast Asian regional dynamics: inventory checking and new discourses on power, interest, and identity’, International Relations of the Asia–Pacific, 10:2, 343–372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Chaesung (2007) ‘Future tasks for developing the field of international relations in South Korea’, Korean Journal of International Relations, 46:S, 227–249 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Chun, Chaesung (2010) ‘Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? Reflections on and from Korea’ in Amitav Acharya and Barry Buzan (eds) Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia (New York: Routledge), 69–91
   Google Scholar
• Chun, Chaesung (2011) in (ed) East Asian international politics: from history to theory (Seoul: East Asia Institute) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Chun, Chaesung and Jun Young Park (2002) ‘Reflections on international relations theories in Korea: in search of alternatives’, Korean Journal of International Relations, 42:4, 7–26 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Jin-Young (2007) ‘International relations education in Korea: beyond repeated self-criticism’, Korean Journal of International Relations, 46:S, 251–263 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Robert W (1986) ‘Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory’ in Robert O Keohane (ed) Neorealism and its critics (New York: Columbia University Press), 204–254
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel (1979) in (ed) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison (London: Peregrine)
   Google Scholar
• Ha, Yong-Chool (2008a) ‘Preface’ in Yong-Chool Ha (ed) New perspectives on international studies in Korea (Seoul: Seoul National University Press), v–xxi (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• (2008b) in Yong-Chool Ha (ed) New perspectives on international studies in Korea (Seoul: Seoul National University Press) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• (2007) in Young-sun Ha and Gon Namkung (eds) Transformation of world politics (Seoul: Eulyoomunhwasa) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Ha, Young-sun and Young-ho Kim (2005) ‘Korean diplomatic history and international relations studies: the correct establishment of Korean international relations studies’ in Young-sun Ha, Young-ho Kim and Myongsob Kim (eds) Korean diplomatic history and international relations studies (Seoul: Sungshin Women's University Press), 9–24 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• (2005) in Young-sun Ha, Young-ho Kim and Myongsob Kim (eds) Korean diplomatic history and international relations studies (Seoul: Sungshin Women's University) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Hahm, Taik-young (2006) ‘Theory and history in “Korean” international relations theories’, Korea and International Politics, 22:4, 1–40 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Hahm, Taik-young (2008) ‘Theory and history in “Korean” international relations theories’ in Yong-Chool Ha (ed) New perspectives on international studies in Korea (Seoul: Seoul National University Press), 34–79 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Seongmin (2008a) ‘Preface’ in Seongmin Hong (ed) Knowledge and international politics: political power permeated in scholarship (Pajoo: Hanul), 5–14 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Seongmin (2008b) ‘Knowledge and international politics: democratization of Korea and task of scholarship’ in Seongmin Hong (ed) Knowledge and international politics: political power permeated in scholarship (Pajoo: Hanul), 19–59 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• (2008c) in Seongmin Hong (ed) Knowledge and international politics: political power permeated in scholarship (Pajoo: Hanul) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, Kimberly (1999) in (ed) International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G John (2009) ‘Liberalism in a realist world: international relations as an American scholarly tradition’, International Studies, 46:1–2, 203–219
   Google Scholar
• Inoguchi, Takashi (2007) ‘Are there any theories of international relations in Japan?’, International Relations of the Asia–Pacific, 7:3, 369–390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (2006) in Branwen Gruffydd Jones (ed) Decolonizing international relations (London: Rowman & Littlefield)
   Google Scholar
• Jung, Hwa Yol (2010) ‘Transversality and what “Global Asia” means in an age of hyphens and hybrids’, Global Asia, 5:4, 88–97
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Jung In (2006) ‘Academic dependency: Western-centrism in Korean political science’, Korea Journal, 46:4, 115–135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Sung-Hack (2010) ‘Korea's international relations as an autonomous discipline: the long road to its globalization’, Journal of International Politics, 15:2, 5–43
   Google Scholar
• Kayaoglu, Turan (2010) ‘Westphalian Eurocentrism in international relations theory’, International Studies Review, 12:2, 193–217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O (1988) ‘International institutions: two approaches’, International Studies Quarterly, 32:4, 379–396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Hak Joon (2011a) ‘In search for the root of Korean political science’, Korean Political Science Association Newsletter, 35:3, 6–7 (in Korean)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Haknoh (2008a) ‘The academic dependence on the US in international political economy studies in Korea’, Korean Journal of International Relations, 48:1, 7–34 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• (2007) in Hyung Kook Kim and Yun Young Cho (eds) Contemporary international relations studies and Korea (Ilsan: Ingansarang) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Hyung Kook and Yun Young Cho (2009) ‘International relations studies in Korea: retrospects and prospects’, Pacific Focus, 24:3, 402–421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Ki-jung (2008b) ‘Tasks of Korean foreign policy research’ in Yong-Chool Ha (ed) New perspectives on international studies in Korea (Seoul: Seoul National University Press), 152–183 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• (2006) in Kyung-il Kim, Kim Dong-choon, Kim Jung-in, Kim Jung-hyun, Shin Jung-wan, Won Ji-yeon, Lee Byung-chun, Lee Se-young, Chang Si-gi, Cho Kyung-lan, Cho Seok-gon and Cho Hee-yeon (eds) Universality within us: the new quest for academic self-reliance (Seoul: Hanul) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Myongsob (2007a) ‘Imperial politics and international politics: in search of IR with Korean self-identity’ in Hyung Kook Kim and Yun Young Cho (eds) Contemporary international relations studies and Korea (Ilsan: Ingansarang), 119–184 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Seokwoo (2007b) ‘Retrospects and prospects of international relations studies in Korea: analyses of development processes and characteristics of the international political economy’, Korean Journal of International Relations, 46:S, 113–139 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Sung-joo (2011b) ‘Identity of Korean international relations studies’, Korean Association of International Studies Newsletter, 138: 2–3 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Tae-hyun (2008c) ‘Postscript: tasks of developing a Korean IR theory’ in Yong-Chool Ha (ed) New perspectives on international studies in Korea (Seoul: Seoul National University Press), 299–335 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Ung-Jin (2002) ‘Scientific hegemony of the methodological network: in search of methodological freedom in the Korean political science’, 21st Century Political Science Review, 12:1, 217–229 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Ung-Jin (2009) in (ed) Scientific hegemony and science democracy: in search of open social sciences (Seoul: Sogang University Press) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Woosang (2007c) in (ed) Korea's security strategy in East Asia (Seoul: Nanam) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Woosang (2008d) ‘Korea as a middle power in the Northeast Asian security environment’ in G John Ikenberry and Chung-in Moon (eds) The United States and Northeast Asia: debates, issues, and new order (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers), 123–141
   Google Scholar
• Kim, YoungMyung (2010) in (ed) From discourse to action: in search of political science with Korean identity (Gyunggido: Hankukhaksuljungbo) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• King, Gary, Robert O Keohane and Sidney Verba (1994) in (ed) Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• KPAC (2003) in (ed) America in our scholarship: a critical reflection on transplantation of American Academic paradigms (Seoul: Hanul) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Ku, Daeyeol (2008) ‘In search of the origins of Korean foreign behavior’, Korean Journal of International Relations, 48:4, 63–87 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Ho-Jae, et al. (2005) in (ed) A study of Korean politics and theories of international relations: Korean political leaders' perceptions and debates on foreign policy (1945–1948) (Seoul: Hwapyungsa) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Jung-Bock (1999) ‘The growth of political science in Korea and its future direction’, Journal of Korean Politics, 8–9:1, 549–567 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Seung-Hwan (2007a) ‘“Doing philosophy” on the periphery’, Korea Journal, 47:1, 126–151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Wan Bom (2007b) ‘Historical trends and future tasks in the diplomatic history studies in Korea’, Korean Journal of International Relations, 46:S, 67–112 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Yong-Jae and Chul-Soon Lee (2006) ‘A bibliographical study on the decolonization discourse in the political science of Korea’, Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 37:1, 83–107 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Mallavarapu, Siddharth (2009) ‘Development of international relations theory in India: traditions, contemporary perspectives and trajectories’, International Studies, 46:1–2, 165–183
   Google Scholar
• Min, Byoung Won (2007) ‘International relations theories and Korea: a critical review and some suggestions’, Korean Journal of International Relations, 46:S, 37–66 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, David (2010) ‘Knowledge and empire: the social sciences and United States imperial expansion’, Identities, 17:1, 2–44
   Google Scholar
• Park, Chan Wook (2005) ‘Political science in Korea’, Political Science in Asia, 1:1, 63–86
   Google Scholar
• Park, Sang-sop (2008) ‘The development of IR educational institution and IR research’ in Yong-Chool Ha (ed) New perspectives on international studies in Korea (Seoul: Seoul National University Press), 2–32 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Yaqing (2007) ‘Why is there no Chinese international relations theory?’, International Relations of the Asia–Pacific, 7:3, 313–340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shani, Giorgio (2008) ‘Toward a post-Western IR: the umma, Khalsa Panth, and critical international theory’, International Studies Review, 10:4, 722–734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, Chih-yu (2010) ‘The West that is not in the West: identifying the self in Oriental modernity’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23:4, 537–560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (2011) in Robbie Shilliam (ed) International relations and non-Western thought: imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Shimizu, Kosuke, et al. (2008) in (ed) Is there a Japanese IR? Seeking an academic bridge through Japan's history of international politics (Otsu: Afrasian Center for Peace and Development Studies, Ryukoku University)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Steve (2000) ‘The discipline of international relations: still an American social science?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2:3, 374–402
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Steve (2002) ‘The United States and the discipline of international relations: “hegemonic country, hegemonic discipline”’, International Studies Review, 4:2, 67–85
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Steve (2004) ‘Singing our world into existence: international relations theory and September 11’, International Studies Quarterly, 48:3, 499–515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling-Folker, Jennifer (2006) ‘Making sense of international relations theory’ in Jennifer Sterling-Folker (ed) Making sense of international relations theory (Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner), 1–12
   Google Scholar
• (2012) in Arlene B Tickner and David L Blaney (eds) Thinking international relations differently (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• (2009) in Arlene B Tickner and Ole Waever (eds) International relations scholarship around the world (New York: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, J Ann (2011a) ‘Dealing with difference: problems and possibilities for dialogue in international relations’, Millennium, 39:3, 607–618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickner, J Ann (2011b) ‘Retelling IR's foundational stories: some feminist and postcolonial perspectives’, Global Change, Peace & Security, 23:1, 5–13
   Google Scholar
• Waever, Ole (1998) ‘The Sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations’, International Organization, 52:4, 687–727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waever, Ole (2010) ‘Still a discipline after all these debates?’ in Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith (eds) International relations theory: discipline and diversity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 297–318
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander (1999) in (ed) Social theory of international politics (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Woo, Chul-Koo (2004) ‘The quest for Korean identity of international relations studies’ in Chul-Koo Woo and Kun Young Park (eds) Contemporary international relations theory and Korea (Seoul: Saheopyongron), 9–18 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Woo, Chul-Koo and Kun Young Park (2004) in (ed) Contemporary international relations theory and Korea (Seoul: Saheopyongron) (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Ren (2010) ‘The international relations theoretical discourse in China: one world, different explanations’, Journal of Chinese Political Science, 15:1, 99–116
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Chun Hee (2010) ‘International relations as an American social science and academic freedom: a need for an expansion of research programmes and the discussion of taboo subjects in international relations’, Journal of Asia–Pacific Studies, 17:2, 127–148 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Jinseog and Kun Young Park (2008) ‘Study of international relations in Korea: reality and search for an alternative’, Journal of Asia–Pacific Studies, 15:1, 57–71 (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Zehfuss, Maja (2002) in (ed) Constructivism in international relations: the politics of reality (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar