Assessing violent nonstate actorness in global politics: a framework for analysis

References

• Abrahms, M (2008) ‘What terrorists really want: terrorist motives and counterterrorism strategy’, International Security, 32:4, 78–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson, F (2005) ‘Globalization, transnational political mobilization, and networks of violence’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 18:1, 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, GT (2004) Nuclear terrorism: the ultimate preventable catastrophe (New York: Times Books)
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D, V Bello, J Gilson and D Spini (2010) Civil society and international governance: the role of non-state actors in the EU, Africa, Asia and the Middle East (London: Taylor and Francis)
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B, M Noortmann and B Noortmann (eds) (2001) Non-state actors in international relations (Aldershot: Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Avant, D, M Finnemore and SK Sell (2010) Who governs the globe? (New York: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Baron, IZ (2009) ‘The problem of dual loyalty’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42:4, 1025–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R (2002) ‘The imperial presidency: the war on terrorism and the revolution of modernity’, Constellations, 9:1, 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bloodgood, EA (2010) ‘The interest group analogy: international non-governmental advocacy organisations in international politics’, Review of International Studies, 37:1, 93–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M (2011) ‘Netwar geopolitics: security, failed states and illicit flows’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 13:4, 490–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutwell, J (1998) ‘Small arms and light weapons: controlling the real instruments of war’, Arms Control Today, 28:6, 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, C and J Vogler (2006) The European Union as a global actor (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Call, CT (2011) ‘Beyond the “failed state”: toward conceptual alternatives’, European Journal of International Relations, 17:2, 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E and A Lawrence (eds) (2010) Rethinking violence: states and non-state actors in conflict (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press)
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, M (1995) ‘Thoughts on relating terrorism to historical contexts’ in M Crenshaw (ed) Terrorism in context (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press), 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, H (2001) ‘Transnational politics at the edges of sovereignty: social movements, crossings and the state at the US–Mexico border’, Global Networks, 1:4, 369–387.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, C, V Haufler and T Porter (1999) Private authority and international affairs (Albany: State University of New York Press)
   Google Scholar
• Doidge, M (2007) ‘Joined at the hip: regionalism and interregionalism’, Journal of European Integration, 29:2, 229–248.
   Google Scholar
• Dryburgh, L (2008) ‘The EU as a global actor? EU policy towards Iran’, European Security, 17:2, 253–271.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, R and D Fisher (2009) The accountant's story: inside the violent world of the Medellin Cartel (Boston, Massachusetts: Grand Central Publishing)
   Google Scholar
• Falkenrath, R (2000) ‘Weapons of mass reaction’, Harvard International Review, 22:2, 52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, Y and R Mansbach (1996) Polities: authority, identities, and change (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press)
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, Y, R Mansbach, RA Denemark, H Spruyt, B Buzan, R Little, JG Stein and M Mann (2000) ‘What is the polity? A roundtable’, International Studies Review, 2:1, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, TR (1993) Minorities at risk: a global view of ethnopolitical conflicts (Washington: United States Institute for Peace Press)
   Google Scholar
• Hall, RB and TJ Biersteker (eds) (2002) The emergence of private authority in global governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, S (2009) ‘FARC, ELN: Colombia's left-wing guerrillas’,  < http://www.cfr.org/colombia/farc-eln-colombias-left-wing-guerrillas/p9272>, accessed 29 September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, C (2001) ‘Five strategies of terrorism’, Small Wars and Insurgencies, 12:3, 39–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, JA and A Prakash (2000) Globalization and governance (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Held, David et al (1999) Global transformations (Oxford: Polity)
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, B and M Smith (1990) World politics (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf)
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B (1998) Inside terrorism (New York: Columbia University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Holzscheiter, A (2005) ‘Discourse as capability: non-state actors' capital in global governance, Millennium’, Journal of International Studies, 33:3, 723–746.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, SP (1993) ‘Clash of civilizations’, Foreign Affairs, 72:3, 22–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, RH (2000) Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations and the third world (New York: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Josselin, D and W Wallace (2001) Non-state actors in world politics (London: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, M and DA Lake (2003) Governance in a global economy: political authority in transition (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M (1999) New wars and old wars: organized violence in a global era (Stanford, California: Stanford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, SN (2010) ‘Internal conflict and political violence: new developments in research’ in E Chenoweth and A Lawrence (eds) Rethinking violence: states and non-state actors in conflict (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press), xi
   Google Scholar
• Katsikas, D (2011) ‘Non-state authority and global governance’, Review of International Studies, 36:S1, 113–135.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, EM and K Sikkink (1998) Activists beyond borders (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K and J Milliken (2009) ‘Introduction: the challenge of non-state armed groups’, Contemporary Security Policy, 30:2, 202–220.
   Google Scholar
• Kydd, AH and BF Walter (2006) ‘The strategies of terrorism’, International Security, 31:1, 49–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landolt, P and L Goldring (2010) ‘Political cultures and transnational social fields: Chileans, Colombians and Canadian activists in Toronto’, Global Networks, 10:4, 443–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linklater, A (1996) ‘Citizenship and sovereignty in the post-Westphalian world’, European Journal of International Relations, 2:1, 77–103.
   Google Scholar
• Maogoto, JN (2005) Battling terrorism: legal perspectives on the use of force and the war on terror (Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Maragia, B (2002) ‘Almost there: another way of conceptualizing and explaining NGOs' quest for legitimacy in global politics’, Non-State Actors and International Law, 2:3, 301–332.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, JT (1997) ‘Power shift’, Foreign Affairs, 76:1, 50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadow, RG (2009) ‘Political violence and the media’, Marquette Law Review, 93:1, 231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, B (2005) ‘Sovereignty under attack: the international society meets the Al Qaeda network’, Review of International Studies, 31:1, 45–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migdal, JS (1988) Strong societies and weak states: state-society relations and state capabilities in the third world (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Mishali-Ram, M (2009) ‘Powerful actors make a difference: theorizing power attributes of nonstate actors’, International Journal of Peace Studies, 14:1, 55–82.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, N (2003) ‘Five wars of globalization’, Foreign Policy, 134:1, 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mulaj, K (ed) (2010) Violent non-state actors in world politics (New York: Columbia University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Nagan, WP and C Hammer (2004) ‘The changing character of sovereignty in international law and international relations’, Columbia Journal of International Law, 43:1, 141–188.
   Google Scholar
• Noortmann, M (2002) ‘Globalisation, global governance and non-state actors: researching beyond the state’, International Law Forum, 4:1, 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Noortmann, M and C Ryngaert (2010) Non-state actor dynamics in international law: from law-takers to law-makers (London: Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Osiander, A (2001) ‘Sovereignty, international relations, and the Westphalian myth’, International Organization, 55:2, 251–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pape, RA (2005) Dying to win: the strategic logic of suicide terrorism (New York: Random House)
   Google Scholar
• Paul, TV (2005) ‘National security state and global terrorism: why the state is not prepared for the new kind of war’ in E Aydınlı and JN Rosenau (eds) Globalization, security, and the nation-state: paradigms in transition (Albany: State University of New York Press), 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, TV, GJ Ikenberry and JA Ikenberry (eds) (2003) The nation state in question (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Pearlstein, RM (2004) Fatal future? The transnational terrorism and the new global disorder (Austin: University of Texas Press)
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, JN (1990) Turbulence in world politics: a theory of change and continuity (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Sageman, M (2004) Understanding terror networks (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press)
   Google Scholar
• Salehyan, I (2010) ‘The delegation of war to rebel organizations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54:3, 493–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehyan, I, DE Cunningham and KS Gleditsch (2011) ‘It takes two: a dyadic analysis of civil war duration and outcome’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53:4, 570–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seul, JR (1999) ‘“Ours is the way of God”: religion, identity and intergroup conflict’, Journal of Peace Research, 36:5, 553–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultz, Richard H, Douglas Farah and Itamara V Lochard (2004, September) ‘Armed groups: a tier-one security priority’, INSS Occasional Paper 57, USAF Institute for National Security Studies, USAF Academy, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, M (2013) ‘Failed states: causes and consequences’, International Journal of Public Law and Policy, 3:1, 63–103.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, G (1977) The external role of the European Community (Farnborough: Saxon House)
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, AM (2004) A new world order (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, R (2004) ‘Who is sovereign?’, Stanford Journal of International Law, 40:2, 329–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohl, R (2005) ‘The tangled web of illicit arms trafficking’, SAIS Review, 25:1, 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S (2005) ‘The dualities of transnational contention: two activist solitudes, or a new world altogether?’, Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 10:1, 53–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S (2007) The new transnational activism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, RC (1997) ‘A modest proposal: statehood and sovereignty in a global age’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 18:3, 748–809.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, ST, SD Kiser and WD Casebeer (2005) Warlords rising: confronting violent non-state actors (Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books)
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C (1978) From mobilization to revolution (New York: Random House)
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C (1990) Coercion, capital and European states, AD 990–1990 (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers)
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, J (ed) (2000) Toxic terror: assessing terrorists' use of chemical and biological weapons (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press)
   Google Scholar
• Vogler, J (1999) ‘The European Union as an actor in international environmental politics’, Environmental Politics, 8:3, 24–48.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J (2007) Inside rebellion: the politics of insurgent violence (New York: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, P (2000) Terrorism versus democracy: the liberal response (London: Frank Cass)
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P (1994) ‘Transnational criminal organisations and international security’, Survival, 36:1, 96–113.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P (2008) Violent non-state actors and national and international security (Zurich: International Relations and Security Network)
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P and EU Savona (1996) The United Nations and transnational organized crime (Abingdon, United Kingdom: Frank Cass Publishers)
   Google Scholar
• Young, MK (2010) ‘Non-state actors in the global order’, Utah Law Review, 2010:1, 81–90.
   Google Scholar