Transformative pathways to world government: a historical institutionalist critique^a

References

• Archibugi, D, M Koenig-Archibugi and R Marchetti (2012) Global democracy: normative and empirical perspectives (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Bexell, M, J Tallberg and A Uhlin (2010) ‘Democracy in global governance: the promise and pitfalls of transnational actors’, Global Governance, 16:1, 81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckinx, B (2011) ‘Domination in global politics: reflections on freedom and an argument for incremental global change’ in L Cabrera (ed) Global governance, global government: institutional visions for an evolving world system (Albany: State University of New York Press), 253–282.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, L (2004) Political theory of global justice: a cosmopolitan case for the world state (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, L (2005) ‘The cosmopolitan imperative: global justice through accountable integration’, Journal of Ethics, 9:1–2, 171–199.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, L (2010) ‘World government: renewed debate, persistent challenges’, European Journal of International Relations, 16:3, 511–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, JL (2005) ‘Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movement research’ in J Hage and M Meeus (eds) Innovation, science and institutional change (New York: Oxford University Press), 505–524.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G and RD Kelemen (2007) ‘The study of critical junctures: theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism’, World Politics, 59:3, 341–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D (2001) The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862–1928 (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Colgan, JD, RO Keohane and T van de Graaf (2012) ‘Punctuated equilibrium in the energy regime complex’, Review of International Organizations, 7:2, 117–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P (1994) ‘Why are institutions the “carriers of history”? Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations, and institutions’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5:2, 205–220.
   Google Scholar
• Deere, C (2008) The implementation game: the TRIPS agreement and the global politics of intellectual property reform in developing countries (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, JS (2006) Deliberative global politics: discourse and democracy in a divided world (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, JS (2008) ‘Two paths to global democracy’, Ethical Perspectives, 15:4, 469–486.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, JS and H Stevenson (2011) ‘Global democracy and earth system governance’, Ecological Economics, 70:11, 1865–1874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, E (2013) ‘In search of democratic agency in deliberative governance’, European Journal of International Relations, 19:4, 847–868.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R and A Strauss (2001) ‘Toward global parliament’, Foreign Affairs, 80:1, 212–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, RE (2010) ‘Global democracy: in the beginning’, International Theory, 2:2, 175–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R and RO Keohane (2005) ‘Accountability and abuses of power in world politics’, American Political Science Review, 99:1, 29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J (2006) The divided West (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press)
   Google Scholar
• Held, D (1993) ‘From city-states to a cosmopolitan order?’ in D Held (ed) Prospects for democracy: north, south, east, west (Oxford: Polity Press), 13–52.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D (2006) Models of democracy (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press)
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, GJ (2001) After victory: institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B (2012) ‘Obstacles to a world state in the shadow of the world market’, Cooperation and Conflict, 47:2, 200–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T (2013) ‘Institutional design and bureaucrats' impact on political control’, Journal of Politics, 75:1, 183–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, F (2012) ‘World government’, Wiley–Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Globalization,  < onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog830/abstract>, accessed 22 November 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I (1995 [1795]) ‘Perpetual peace: a philosophical sketch’ in H Reiss (ed) Kant: political writings (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 93–130.
   Google Scholar
• Koremenos, B, C Lipson and D Snidal (2001) ‘The rational design of international institutions’, International Organization, 55:4, 761–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krisch, N (2010) Beyond constitutionalism: the pluralist structure of postnational law (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Leebron, D (2002) ‘Symposium: the boundaries of the WTO: linkages’, American Journal of International Law, 96:1, 5–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, A and K Macdonald (2013) ‘Pathways to global democracy: escaping the statist imaginary’, Review of International Studies, 39:4, 789–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, K and T Macdonald (2010) ‘Democracy in a pluralist global order: corporate power and stakeholder representation’, Ethics & International Affairs, 24:1, 19–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J and K Thelen (2010) ‘A gradual theory of institutional change’ in J Mahoney and K Thelen (eds) Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency and power (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, R (2008) Global democracy, for and against: ethical theory, institutional design, and social struggles (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Patomäki, H (2009) ‘Review of Global democracy: for and against: ethical theory, institutional design and social struggles by Raffaele Marchetti’, Millennium, 38:1, 193–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, A (2009) ‘The merits of global constitutionalism’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 16:2, 397–411.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P (2004) Politics in time: history, institutions and social analysis (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D (2000) ‘How far will economic integration go?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14:1, 177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C and C Daugbjerg (2010) ‘Power learning or path dependency? Investigating the roots of the European Food Safety Authority’, Public Administration, 88:2, 315–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schabas, WA (2007) An introduction to the International Criminal Court (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Stone, RW (2011) Controlling institutions: international organizations and the global economy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J, T Squatrito, T Sommerer and C Jönsson (2013) ‘Explaining the transnational design of international organizations’, paper prepared for the workshop ‘Design and effects of international institutions’, ECPR Joint Sessions, Mainz, 12–15 March.
   Google Scholar
• Tännsjö, T (2008) Global democracy: the case for a world government (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C (1984) Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons (New York: Russell Sage Foundation)
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G (2002) Veto players: how political institutions work (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Walker, N (2002) ‘The idea of constitutional pluralism’, Modern Law Review, 65:3, 317–359.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, TG (2003) ‘The illusion of UN Security Council reform’, Washington Quarterly, 26:4, 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, TG (2009) ‘What happened to the idea of world government?’, International Studies Quarterly, 53:2, 253–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A (2003) ‘Why a world state is inevitable’, European Journal of International Relations, 9:4, 491–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar