Cosmetic agreements and the cracks beneath: ideological convergences and divergences in US and EU democracy promotion in civil society

References

• AbrahamsenR (2000) Disciplining democracy: development discourse and good governance in Africa (London: Zed Books)
   Google Scholar
• AdasM (2001) ‘From settler colony to global hegemon’, American Historical Review, 106:5, 1692–1720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AgnewJ (1987) The United States in the world-economy: a regional geography (New York: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• AlbrightM (2010) ‘NDI transatlantic dialogue: strengthening cooperation on democracy support’, Washington DC, 28 June, < http://www.ndi.org/files/EU-US_Albright_Opening_Remarks.pdf>, accessed 15 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Burnell, P (ed) (2000) Democracy assistance: international co-operation for democratization (London: Frank Cass)
   Google Scholar
• CarothersT (2008) Does democracy promotion have a future?, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, < http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa = view&id = 20247>, accessed 16 September 2010.
   Google Scholar
• CarothersT (2009a) Revitalizing democracy assistance Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, < http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/revitalizing_democracy_assistance.pdf>, accessed 16 September 2010
   Google Scholar
• CarothersT (2009b) ‘Democracy assistance: political vs developmental?’, Journal of Democracy, 20:1, 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, T and MOttaway (eds) (2000) Funding virtue: civil society aid and democracy promotion (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace)
   Google Scholar
• ClintonH (2009) ‘Remarks on the human rights agenda for the 21st century’, Speech at Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA, 14 December, < http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/12/133544.htm>, accessed 23 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• ClintonH (2010) ‘Civil society: supporting democracy in the 21st century’, Speech at the Community of Democracies, Krakow, Poland, 3 July, < http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/07/143952.htm>, accessed 20 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• DahlR (2000) A preface to economic democracy (Berkeley, California: University of California Press)
   Google Scholar
• Del Biondo K (2014) ‘Promoting democracy or the external context? Comparing the substance of EU and US democracy assistance in Ethiopia’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs,  < http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2014.891099>.
   Google Scholar
• DiamondL (2008a) ‘Democracy in retreat’, Real Clear Politics,  < http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/democracy_in_retreat.html>, accessed 16 September 2010.
   Google Scholar
• DiamondL (2008b) ‘How to save democracy?’, Newsweek, 31 December, < http://www.newsweek.com/2008/12/30/how-to-save-democracy.html>, accessed 16 September 2010.
   Google Scholar
• DiamondL (2008c) ‘The democratic rollback: the resurgence of predatory state’, Foreign Affairs, March/April, 36–48.
   Google Scholar
• DRL—Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (2010a) ‘Democracy’,  < http://www.state.gov/g/drl/democ/index.htm>, accessed 20 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• DRL (2010b) ‘DRL programs, including human rights democracy funds (HRDF)’,  < http://www.state.gov/g/drl/p/index.htm>, accessed 20 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• DRL (2010c) ‘August 2010 proposal submission instructions (PSI)’,  < http://www.state.gov/g/drl/p/august_2010/index.htm>, accessed 20 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• DRL (2010d) ‘DRL monitoring and evaluation primer and sample M&E plan’,  < http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/138430.pdf>, accessed 20 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• DuffieldM (2007) Development, security and unending war (Cambridge: Polity Press)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (1995) ‘On inclusion of respect for democratic principles and human rights in agreements between the Community and third countries’, Commission Communication, COM (95) 216 (Brussels: European Community)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (1998) ‘Democratisation, the rule of law, respect for human rights and good governance: the challenges of the partnership between the European Union and the ACP states’, Commission Communication to the Council and Parliament, COM (98) 146 (Brussels: European Community)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2001) ‘The European Union's role in promoting human rights and democratisation in third countries’, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament COM (2001) 252 final (Brussels: European Community)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2004) ‘Communication from the Commission: European Neighborhood Policy strategy paper’, COM (2004) 373 Final (Brussels: European Community)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2006) ‘European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) strategy paper 2007–2010’, DG RELEX/B/1 jvk 70618 (Brussels: European Community)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2007a) Furthering human rights and democracy across the globe (Brussels: European Community)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2007b) European instrument for democracy and human rights compendium 2007–2012 (Brussels: European Community)
   Google Scholar
• FaganA (2014) ‘Democracy promotion in Kosovo: mapping the substance of donor assistance and a comparative analysis of strategies’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs,  < http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2014.912612>.
   Google Scholar
• FoleyM (2007) American credo. The place of ideas in American politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• FreedenM (1996) Ideologies and political theory: a conceptual approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• GillsB and JRocamora (1992) ‘Low intensity democracy’, Third World Quarterly, 13:3, 501–523.
   Google Scholar
• GillsB, JRocamora and RWilson (1993) Low intensity democracy. Political power in the new world order (London: Pluto Press)
   Google Scholar
• HarveyD (2005) The new imperialism, paperback edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• HayekF (1960) The constitution of liberty (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul)
   Google Scholar
• HeldD (1996) Models of democracy, 2nd edition (Oxford: Polity Press)
   Google Scholar
• HuberD (2008) ‘Democracy assistance in the Middle East and North Africa: a comparison of US and EU policies’, Mediterranean Politics, 13:1, 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaganR (2006) Dangerous nation (New York: Alfred A. Knopf)
   Google Scholar
• KopsteinJ (2006) ‘The transatlantic divide over democracy promotion’, The Washington Quarterly, 29:2, 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KurkiM (2010) ‘The EU as a fuzzy liberal democracy promoter’, Paper presented at SGIR conference, Stockholm, Sweden, September 2010.
   Google Scholar
• KurkiM (2011a) ‘Democracy through technocracy’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 5:2, 211–234.
   Google Scholar
• KurkiM (2011b) ‘Governmentality and EU democracy promotion: the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the construction of democratic civil societies’, International Political Sociology, 5:4, 349–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KurkiM (2012) ‘How the EU can adopt a new type of democracy support’, FRIDE working paper (Madrid: Fride), < http://www.fride.org/publication-newsletter/998/how-the-eu-can-adopt-a-new-type-of-democracy-support>, accessed 12 July 2013.
   Google Scholar
• KurkiM (2013) Democratic futures. Revisioning democracy promotion (Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• LandmanT (2009) Concepts matter: delineating democracy, governance and human rights (Stockholm: International IDEA),  < http://www.idea.int/resources/analysis/upload/Landman_paper20.pdf>, accessed 25 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• MacPhersonCB (1977) The life and times of liberal democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• LijphartA (1999) Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six democracies (New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Magen, A, TRisse and MMcFaul (eds) (2009) Promoting democracy and the rule of law: American and European strategies (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• MannersI (2006) ‘The constitutive nature of values, images and principles in European foreign policy’ in SLucarelli and IManners (eds) Values and principles in European Union foreign policy (London: Routledge), 19–41.
   Google Scholar
• MerckF (1995) Manifest destiny and mission in American history: a reinterpretation (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press)
   Google Scholar
• NDI (2010a) Participant statement: reinvigorating democracy support in an evolving world, Brussels, 15 March 2011, < http://www.ndi.org/files/transatlantic-dialogue-statement-0311.pdf>, accessed 14 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• NDI (2010b) Transatlantic dialogue seeks to strengthen dialogue on democracy support,  < http://www.ndi.org/node/16435>, accessed 14 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• NED (2006) The backlash against democracy assistance (Washington, DC: NED),  < http://www.ned.org/docs/backlash06.pdf>, accessed 12 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• ObamaB (2010) ‘Remarks by the president to the United Nations General Assembly’, New York, USA, 23 September, < http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/23/remarks-president-united-nations-general-assembly>, accessed 24 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• OmelichevaM (2014) ‘Competing perspectives on democracy and democratization: assessing alternative models of democracy promoted in Central Asian states’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs,  < http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2014.902036>.
   Google Scholar
• PaceM (2009) Liberal or social democracy? Aspects of the EU's democracy promotion agenda in the Middle East (Stockholm: IDEA)
   Google Scholar
• PetrovaT (2014) ‘International, national, or local? Explaining the substance of democracy promotion: the case of Eastern European democracy promotion’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs,  < http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2014.891100>.
   Google Scholar
• PrzeworskiA (1991) Democracy and the market (New York: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• ReynaertV (2011) ‘Preoccupied with the market: the EU as a promoter of “shallow” democracy in the Mediterranean’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 16:5, 623–637.
   Google Scholar
• RobinsonWI (1996) Promoting polyarchy. Globalization, US intervention, and hegemony (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• RobinsonWI (2004) A theory of global capitalism: production, class, and state in a transnational world (Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press)
   Google Scholar
• RobinsonWI (2010) ‘Beyond the theory of imperialism. Global capitalism and the transnational state’ in AAnievas (ed) Marxism and world politics. Contesting global capitalism (Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge), 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• RupnikJ (2007) ‘From democracy fatigue to populist backlash’, Journal of Democracy, 18:4, 17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SandbrookR et al (2007) Social democracy in the global periphery: origins, challenges, prospects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• SchmidtJ (2014) ‘Constructing new environments versus attitude adjustment: contrasting the substance of democracy in UN and EU democracy promotion discourses’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs,  < http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2014.931353>.
   Google Scholar
• SklairL (2001) The transnational capitalist class (Oxford: Blackwell)
   Google Scholar
• TiltonI (1991) The political theory of the Swedish social democracy (Oxford: Clarendon)
   Google Scholar
• USAID (1998) Handbook of democracy and governance program indicators (Washington, DC: USAID)
   Google Scholar
• USAID (2011) Partnering with USAID. Building alliances for sustainable solutions (Washington, DC: USAID),  < http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADW238.pdf>, accessed 1 December 2011.
   Google Scholar
• USAID DCHA/DG (2010) User's guide to DG programming (Washington, DC: USAID)
   Google Scholar
• US Department of State (2010) Advancing freedom and democracy reports (Washington, DC: US Department of State),  < http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/afdr/2010/frontmatter/129719.htm>, accessed 20 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• The White House (2010) National security strategy,  < http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf>, accessed 16 September 2010.
   Google Scholar
• YoungsR (2001) The European Union and the promotion of democracy: Europe's Mediterranean and Asian policies (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• YoungsR (2003) ‘European approaches to democracy assistance: learning the right lessons?’, Third World Quarterly, 24:1, 127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoungsR (2010) Retreat of liberal internationalism (Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• YoungsR (2011) ‘Misunderstanding the maladies of liberal democracy promotion’ in CHobson and MKurki (eds) Conceptual politics of democracy promotion (Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• WaligorskyC (1997) Liberal economics and democracy: Keynes, Galbraith, Thurow, and Reich (Lawrence, Kansas: Kansas University Press), 100–116.
   Google Scholar
• WetzelA, OrbieJ and BossuytF (forthcoming) ‘One-of-what-kind? Comparative perspectives on the substance of EU democracy promotion’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• ZakariaF (1997) ‘The rise of illiberal democracy’, Foreign Affairs, 76, 22–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar