Constructing new environments versus attitude adjustment: contrasting the substance of democracy in UN and EU democracy promotion discourses

References

• AnnanK (1998) ‘The quiet revolution’, Global Governance, 4, 123–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnnanK (2002) ‘Democracy as an international issue’, Global Governance, 8, 135–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AyersAJ (2008) ‘“We all know a democracy when we see one”: (neo)liberal orthodoxy in the “democratisation” and “good governance” project’, Policy and Society, 27, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• CarothersT (2002) ‘The end of the transition paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, 13:1, 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChandlerD (2000) Bosnia: faking democracy after Dayton (London: Pluto Press)
   Google Scholar
• ChandlerD (2006) From Kosovo to Kabul and beyond: human rights and international intervention, new edition (London: Pluto Press)
   Google Scholar
• CheckelJ (1998) ‘The constructivist turn in international relations theory’, World Politics, 50:2, 324–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChestermanS (2004) You, the people: the United Nations, transitional administration and state-building (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• CrawfordG (2005) ‘The European Union and democracy promotion in Africa: the case of Ghana’, European Journal of Development Research, 17, 571–600.
   Google Scholar
• DoornbosM (2003) ‘“Good governance”: the metamorphosis of a policy metaphor’, Journal of International Affairs, 5:1, 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• EmersonM and GNoutcheva (2004) ‘Europeanisation as a gravity model of democratisation’, CEPS Working Document 214, < http://www.ceps.eu/book/europeanisation-gravity-model-democratisation>, accessed 4 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• EuropeAid (2005) ‘Institutional Assessment and capacity development: why, what and how?’, Reference Document 1, < http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/multimedia/publications/documents/tools/europeaid_institutional_assessment_capacity_devlpmt_2006_en.pdf>, accessed 4 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (1995) ‘The European Union and the external dimension of human rights policy: from Rome to Maastricht and beyond’, COM (95)567, 22 November 1995, < http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = COM:1995:0567:FIN:EN:PDF>, accessed 4 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (1998) ‘Democratisation, the rule of law, respect for human rights and good governance: the challenges of the partnership between the European Union and the ACP states’, COM(98)146, 24 February 1998, < http://archive.idea.int/lome/bgr_docs/eucom.pdf>, accessed 4 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2003) ‘Governance and development’, COM(2003)615, 20 October 2003, < http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = COM:2003:0615:FIN:EN:PDF>, accessed 4 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2006) ‘Governance in the European consensus on development—towards a harmonised approach within the European Union’, COM(2006)421, 30 August 2006, < http://aei.pitt.edu/37806/1/COM_(2006)_421_final.pdf>, accessed 30 April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2008) ‘Analysing and addressing governance in sector operations’, EuropeAid Reference Document 4, < http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/infopoint/publications/europeaid/documents/149a_en.pdf>, accessed 4 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009) ‘Supporting democratic governance through the governance initiative—a review and the way forward’, SEC(2009)58, 19 January 2009, < http://ec.europa.eu/development/icenter/repository/CSWP_SEC_2009_0058_governance_en.pdf>, accessed 4 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011) ‘A partnership for democracy and shared prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean’, COM(2011)200, 8 March 2011, < http://eeas.europa.eu/euromed/docs/com2011_200_en.pdf>, accessed 4 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (1991) ‘Resolution on human rights, democracy and development’, 28 November 1991, < http://archive.idea.int/lome/bgr_docs/resolution.html>, accessed 4 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• FarerTJ (2004) ‘The promotion of democracy: international law and norms’ in RRich and ENewman (eds) The UN role in promoting democracy: between ideals and reality (Tokyo: UNU Press), 32–61.
   Google Scholar
• FlockhartT (2006) ‘“Complex socialization”: a framework for the study of state socialization’, European Journal for International Relations, 12:1, 89–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FoucaultM (1978) The history of sexuality, volume 1: an introduction (New York: Pantheon)
   Google Scholar
• FoucaultM (1991a [1975]) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison (London: Penguin Books)
   Google Scholar
• FoucaultM (1991b) ‘Questions of method’ in GBurchell, CGordon and PMiller (eds) The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
   Google Scholar
• FoucaultM (2004) Society must be defended: lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976 (London: Penguin Books)
   Google Scholar
• FoucaultM (2008) The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• FoucaultM (2009) Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• FreyburgT (2011) ‘Transgovernmental networks as catalysts for democratic change? EU functional cooperation with Arab authoritarian regimes and socialization of involved state officials into democratic governance’, Democratization, 18:4, 1001–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FreyburgT, SLavenex, FSchimmelfennig, TSkripka and A Wetzel (2009) ‘EU promotion of democratic governance in the neighbourhood’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16:6, 916–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukuyamaF (1992) The end of history and the last man (New York: Free Press)
   Google Scholar
• HindessB (2000) ‘Representation ingrafted upon democracy?’, Democratization, 7:2, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• HobsonC (2008) ‘Democracy as civilisation’, Global Society, 22:1, 75–95.
   Google Scholar
• HobsonC (2011) ‘Towards a critical theory of democratic peace’, Review of International Studies, 37:4, 1903–1922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuntingtonSP (1996) ‘Democracy for the long haul’, Journal of Democracy, 7:2, 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IgnatieffM (2003) Empire lite: nation-building in Bosnia, Kosovo, and Afghanistan (London: Penguin Books)
   Google Scholar
• JørgensenKE (2006) ‘Theoretical perspectives on the role of values, images and principles in foreign policy’ in SLucarelli and IManners (eds) Values and principles in European Union foreign policy (London: Routledge), 42–58.
   Google Scholar
• KeohaneR (2002) ‘Ironies of sovereignty: the European Union and the United States’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:4, 743–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler-KochB and BRittberger (2006) ‘Review article: the “governance” turn in EU studies’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 27–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KoivistoM and TDunne (2010) ‘Crisis, what crisis? Liberal order building and world order conventions’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38:3, 615–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KurkiM (2011) ‘Democracy through technocracy? Reflections on technocratic assumptions in EU democracy promotion discourse’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 5:2, 211–234.
   Google Scholar
• LargeJ and TSisk (2006) Democracy, conflict and human security (Stockholm: IDEA)
   Google Scholar
• LucarelliS (2006) ‘Introduction: values, principles, identity and European Union foreign policy’ in SLucarelli and IManners (eds) Values and principles in European Union foreign policy (London: Routledge), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• LudwigR (2004) ‘The UN's electoral assistance: challenges, accomplishments, prospects’ in RRich and ENewman (eds) The UN role in promoting democracy: between ideals and reality (Tokyo: UNU Press), 169–187.
   Google Scholar
• MannersI (2002) ‘Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:2, 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MansfieldED and JSnyder (1995) ‘Democratization and the danger of war’, International Security, 20:1, 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NewmanE (2004) ‘UN democracy promotion: comparative advantages and constraints’ in RRich and ENewman (eds) The UN role in promoting democracy: between ideals and reality (Tokyo: UNU Press), 188–207.
   Google Scholar
• PaceM (2009) ‘Paradoxes and contradictions in EU democracy promotion in the Mediterranean: the limits of EU normative power’, Democratization, 16:1, 39–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParisR (2004) At war's end: building peace after civil conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• PughM (2004) ‘Peacekeeping and critical theory’, International Peacekeeping, 11:1, 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• RichR and ENewman (2004) ‘Introduction: approaching democratization policy’ in RRich and ENewman (eds) The UN role in promoting democracy: between ideals and reality (Tokyo: UNU Press), 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• RichmondOP (2004) ‘UN peace operations and the dilemmas of the peacebuilding consensus’, International Peacekeeping, 11:1, 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• RichmondOP (2006) Peace in international relations (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• RichmondOP (2012) ‘A pedagogy of peacebuilding: infrapolitics, resistance, and liberation’, International Political Sociology, 6:2, 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RisseT (1995) ‘Democratic peace—warlike democracies? A social constructivist interpretation of the liberal argument’, European Journal of International Relations, 1:4, 491–517.
   Google Scholar
• RisseT and SCRopp (1999) ‘International human rights norms and domestic change: conclusions’ in TRisse, SCRopp and KSikkink (eds) The power of human rights international norms and domestic change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 234–278.
   Google Scholar
• RushtonS (2008) ‘The UN Secretary-General and norm entrepreneurship: Boutros Boutros-Ghali and democracy promotion’, Global Governance, 14:1, 95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SjursenH (2006) ‘The EU as a “normative” power: how can this be?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13:2, 235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN (2009) ‘Guidance note of the Secretary-General on democracy’,  < http://www.un.org/democracyfund/sites/dr7.un.org.democracyfund/files/file_attach/UNSG%20Guidance%20Note%20on%20Democracy-EN.pdf>, accessed 30 April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• WendtA (1992) ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: social construction of power politics’, International Organization, 46:2, 391–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WetzelA (2011) ‘The promotion of participatory governance in the EU's external policies: compromised by sectoral economic interests?’, Democratization, 18:4, 978–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WetzelA and JOrbie (2011) ‘With map and compass on narrow paths and through shallow waters: discovering the substance of EU democracy promotion’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 16, 705–725.
   Google Scholar
• YoungsR (2004) ‘Normative dynamics and strategic interests in the EU's external identity’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42:2, 415–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZanottiL (2006) ‘Taming chaos: a Foucauldian view of UN peacekeeping, democracy and normalization’, International Peacekeeping, 13:2, 150–167.
   Google Scholar