The UNGA—a talking shop? Exploring rationales for the repetition of resolutions in subsequent negotiations

References

• Abbott, KW and DSnidal (1998) ‘Why states act through formal international organizations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42:1, 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D, TFarrell and HLambert (2010) International law and international relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, M (1990) ‘High politics is low politics: the domestic and systemic sources of Israeli security policy, 1967–1977’, World Politics, 43, 529–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berton, P, HKimura and WKimura (eds) (1999) International negotiation: actors, structure/process, values (New York: St Martin's Press)
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, I (1995) ‘The UN at 50: a time to reform’, Foreign Policy, 100, 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Claude, IL, Jr (1966) ‘Collective legitimization as a political function of the United Nations’, International Organization, 20:3, 367–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, A, PNunnenkamp and RThiele (2008) ‘Does US aid buy UN General Assembly votes? A disaggregated analysis’, Public Choice, 136, 139–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M and KSikkink (1998) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization, 52:4, 887–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florini, A (1996) ‘The evolution of international norms’, International Studies Quarterly, 40:3, 363–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gareis, SB and JVarwick (2005) The United Nations: an introduction (Basingstoke: Palgrave)
   Google Scholar
• Habeeb, WM (1988) Power and tactics in international negotiation: how weak nations bargain with strong nations (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Harbert, JR (1976) ‘The behaviour of the ministates in the United Nations, 1971–1972’, International Organisation, 30:1, 109–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, S (1990) ‘Forty years of United Nations General Assembly voting’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 23, 279–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Court of Justice (1996) Secondary legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons, advisory opinion (The Hague:
   Google Scholar
• Jebb, G (1952) ‘The role of the United Nations’, International Organization, 6:4, 509–520.
   Google Scholar
• Joyner, CC (1981) ‘UN General Assembly resolutions and international law: rethinking the contemporary dynamics of norm-creation’, California Western International Law Journal, 11:1, 445–478.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M and KSikkink (1998) Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Kegley, CW, Jr and Hook, SW (1991) ‘US foreign aid and UN voting: did Reagan's linkage strategy buy defence or defiance?’, International Studies Quarterly, 35:3, 295–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, RO (1967) ‘The study of political influence in the General Assembly’, International Organisations, 21:2, 221–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, SD (1999) Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Kremenyuk, V (1991) International negotiation: analysis, approaches, issues (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass)
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, TJ (1972) ‘Four systems of policy, politics and choice’, Public Administration Review, 32:4, 298–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manno, CS (1966) ‘Majority decisions and minority responses in the UN General Assembly’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10:1, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, HJ (1948) Politics among nations (New York: McGraw Hill)
   Google Scholar
• Panke, D (2013a) ‘Regional power revisited: how to explain differences in coherency and success of regional organisations in the United Nations General Assembly’, International Negotiation, 18:2, 265–291.
   Google Scholar
• Panke, D (2013b) Unequal actors in equalising institutions: negotiations in the United Nations General Assembly (Basingstoke: Palgrave)
   Google Scholar
• Panke, D (2013c) ‘Getting ready to negotiate in international organizations? On the importance of the domestic construction of national positions’ Journal of International Organizations Studies, 4, 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, MJ (2008) ‘General Assembly’ in TGWeiss and SDaws (eds) The Oxford handbook on the United Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 97–116.
   Google Scholar
• Plantey, A. (2007) International negotiation in the twenty-first century (New York: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Reinicke, WH and JMWitte (2000) ‘Interdependence, globalisation and sovereignty: the role of non-binding international legal accords’ in DShelton (ed) Commitment and compliance: the role of non-binding norms in the international legal system (Oxford University Press: Oxford), 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T, SCRopp and KRopp (eds) (1999) The power of human rights: international norms and domestic change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, D (ed) (2000) Commitment and compliance: the role of non-binding norms in the international legal system (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, A (1986) ‘Culture in action: symbols and strategies’, American Sociological Review, 51:2, 273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Langenhove, L (2011) Building regions: the regionalization of the world order (Farnham: Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K (1979) Theory of international politics (New York: McGraw-Hill)
   Google Scholar
• Wang, TY (1999) ‘US foreign aid and UN voting: an analysis of important issues’, International Studies Quarterly, 43:1, 199–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar